Skip to main content
Download PDF

A novel rhein-huprine hybrid ameliorates disease-modifying properties in preclinical mice model of Alzheimer’s disease exacerbated with high fat diet

Cell & Bioscience volume 13, Article number: 52 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is characterized by a polyetiological origin. Despite the global burden of AD and the advances made in AD drug research and development, the cure of the disease remains elusive, since any developed drug has demonstrated effectiveness to cure AD. Strikingly, an increasing number of studies indicate a linkage between AD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), as both diseases share some common pathophysiological features. In fact, β-secretase (BACE1) and acetylcholinesterase (AChE), two enzymes involved in both conditions, have been considered promising targets for both pathologies. In this regard, due to the multifactorial origin of these diseases, current research efforts are focusing on the development of multi-target drugs as a very promising option to derive effective treatments for both conditions.

In the present study, we evaluated the effect of rhein-huprine hybrid (RHE-HUP), a synthesized BACE1 and AChE inhibitor, both considered key factors not only in AD but also in metabolic pathologies. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of this compound in APP/PS1 female mice, a well-established familial AD mouse model, challenged by high-fat diet (HFD) consumption to concomitantly simulate a T2DM-like condition.

Results

Intraperitoneal treatment with RHE-HUP in APP/PS1 mice for 4 weeks reduced the main hallmarks of AD, including Tau hyperphosphorylation, Aβ42 peptide levels and plaque formation. Moreover, we found a decreased inflammatory response together with an increase in different synaptic proteins, such as drebrin 1 (DBN1) or synaptophysin, and in neurotrophic factors, especially in BDNF levels, correlated with a recovery in the number of dendritic spines, which resulted in memory improvement. Notably, the improvement observed in this model can be attributed directly to a protein regulation at central level, since no peripheral modification of those alterations induced by HFD consumption was observed.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that RHE-HUP could be a new candidate for the treatment of AD, even for individuals with high risk due to peripheral metabolic disturbances, given its multi-target profile which allows for the improvement of some of the most important hallmarks of the disease.

Background

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is defined as a chronic neurodegenerative disease that involves a progressive and irreversible memory loss, followed by a state of total dementia, as well as behavioral disturbances [1, 2]. This neurodegenerative disorder considered the most common form of dementia worldwide [3], displays a high prevalence and increasing incidence, especially among elderly people. In fact, about 33.9 million people worldwide are suffering from AD, and it is expected to triple over the next 40 years [4, 5].

AD is mainly characterized by the presence of abundant extracellular amyloid-beta peptide deposits (Aβ) and intracellular hyperphosphorylated Tau protein (p-Tau), that accumulate to form senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) respectively, both contributing to neuronal loss [6, 7]. Aβ plaques are produced by the proteolytic cleavages of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by the beta-secretase 1 (BACE1) enzyme activity and subsequently by γ-secretase, resulting in Aβ peptides of different length, including 38, 40 and 42 amino acids (aa). Specifically, those Aβ composed by 42 aa readily tend to aggregate, resulting in Aβ plaque formation [8, 9]. Phosphorylation is the major modification of Tau protein and it has been described as a critical step in the formation of NFTs [10]. Evidence suggests that Aβ plaques could be involved in the induction of aberrant Tau phosphorylation, thus supporting a causal crosslink between these two pathogenic processes [11,12,13]. In addition, the aggregation of Aβ into oligomers and fibrils in the brain is also modified by factors such as acetylcholinesterase (AChE), which precipitates the formation of toxic aggregates by accelerating Aβ deposition and increasing its neurotoxicity, contributing to neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and synaptic dysfunction [14, 15]. Additionally, the role of AChE in AD goes much further, since numerous studies have shown the existence of a cholinergic deficit in AD patients due to the modification in the activity of AChE and the decrease in acetylcholine levels [16, 17]. In fact, some of the compounds used as anti-AD drugs like donepezil, galantamine and rivastigmine are AChE inhibitors [18]. However, none of them have been able to totally stop the progression of pathology. For this reason, new approaches to its etiology are being studied nowadays [19]. In addition, it has been described that elevated AChE concentrations could also trigger the systemic inflammation, key in T2DM and AD, representing an interesting therapeutic target for both diseases, which support previous studies that described the possible relationship between AD and metabolic alterations [20,21,22], stressing AD as a multifactorial disease. In fact, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and metabolic syndrome, all associated with insulin resistance, are recognized risk factors for cognitive disturbances [23,24,25] and type 3 diabetes has been proposed as a term to describe the complex interlink between insulin resistance and AD [26,27,28].

Hence, the regulation of metabolic alterations could be an effective strategy to reduce cognitive decline and dementia [29]. In this way, some studies have shown the role of BACE1 in AD progression, not only as a key regulator of the formation of the Aβ peptide but also its function in metabolic regulation [30, 31]. In fact, it has been demonstrated that subtle neuronal expression of human BACE1 resulted in AD phenotypes alongside systemic T2DM-like symptoms, suggesting that BACE1 inhibitors could be used for the treatment of T2DM-associated pathologies [32].

Taken together, evidence suggests that AD is a complex disorder that arises from multiple molecular alterations, therefore, the design of drugs with multiple biological targets could be key for an effective treatment [33]. A recent developed multi-target RHE-HUP hybrid compounds [34] combine the pharmacophores of rhein, a natural product structurally related to some hydroxyanthraquinones with tau anti-aggregating activity, and huprine Y, a strong AChE inhibitor. RHE-HUP displays a strong in vitro activity against its primary targets (tau aggregation and AChE) and a not less strong BACE1 inhibitory activity. Studies conducted in vivo [35] have demonstrated that RHE-HUP reduced Aβ levels, Tau phosphorylation and memory impairment in an APPswe/PS-1dE9 double transgenic mouse model. However, the effect of RHE-HUP on metabolic dysregulation associated to AD has not been evaluated yet. For this reason, the aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of this new compound in the progression of AD when it is comorbid with metabolic alterations generated by the chronic consumption of a high-fat diet (HFD).

Methods

Animals and treatment

6 month old female APPswe/PS1dE9 (APP/PS1) double transgenic mice and wild-type (WT) littermates with the same genetic background (C57BL/6) were used. This animal model was chosen according to previous studies reporting that female mice develop higher progressive memory impairment and AD-like neuropathology compared to male mice [36, 37]. These transgenic mice express a Swedish (K594M/N595L) mutation of a chimeric mouse/human APP (mo/huAPP695swe), together with the human exon-9-deleted variant of PS1 (PS1-dE9). In all cases, animals were obtained from established breeding couples in the animal facility (Animal facility from the Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences of the University of Barcelona; approval number C-0032). After the weaning, at 21 days old, and throughout their growth, animals were fed with conventional chow (control diet, CT; ENVIGO, Madison, Wt 53744–4220) or with a palmitic acid-enriched diet containing 60% of fat mainly from hydrogenated coconut oil (HFD) (Research Diets Inc., NB, US). RHE-HUP hybrid (+)-(7R,11R)-N-{9-[(3-chloro-6,7,10,11-tetrahydro-9-methyl-7,11-methanocycloocta[b]quinolin-12-yl)amino]nonyl}-9,10-dihydro-4,5-dihydroxy-9,10-dioxoanthracene-2-carboxamide was prepared as previously reported [38]. When animals were 5 months old, they were treated intraperitoneally (i.p.), either with saline solution or with RHE-HUP at a dose of 2.0 mg/Kg and diluted in bidistilled water with 3% DMSO, three times per week during 4 weeks (Fig. 1). Thus, the study included three experimental groups: WT CT SALINE, APP/PS1 HFD SALINE and APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Graphical representation of experimental design. 6 month-old female APP/PS1 and WT littermates were used. After the weaning, animals were fed either control or HFD. When animals were 5 months old, they were treated intraperitoneally (i.p.), either with saline solution or with RHE-HUP at a dose of 2.0 mg/Kg. Then, animals were subjected to two different behavioral tests: MWM and NORT. After that, GTT and ITT were performed and animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation in order to obtain tissue samples and to perform Golgi Staining Kit, or by intracardially perfusion for immunochemistry/ThS

Full size image

All animals were kept under stable conditions of humidity and temperature, standard light-dark cycle (12 h light/dark cycle) and food and water ad libitum following the ethical guidelines defined by the European Committee (European Communities Council Directive 2010/63/EU). Manipulation protocols were previously approved by the ethics committee from the University of Barcelona, and, at all times, it was made sure that animal numbers, their stress, and pain were kept under a necessary minimum following the appropriate animal manipulation ethical methodologies. All the experiments were performed in accordance with the European Community Council Directive 86/609/EEC and the procedures were established by the Department d’Agricultura, Ramaderia i Pesca of the Generalitat de Catalunya.

Glucose and insulin tolerance tests

Mice were fasted for 6 h and the tests were performed in a room preheated to + 28 ℃. For the glucose tolerance test (GTT), glucose was administered at a dose of 1 g/Kg i.p. For the insulin tolerance test (ITT), a dose of 0.75 IU/Kg was used. Samples from the tail vein were extracted in consecutive periods. Glucose was measured using an Accu-check® Aviva glucometer at 5, 15, 30, 60 and 120 min after glucose administration and at 15, 30, 45, 60 and 90 min after the insulin administration. To those animals in which blood glucose levels dropped under a concentration of 20 mg/dl in the ITT, a dosage of 1 g/Kg of glucose was administered i.p. 13 animals per group were used.

Behavioral tests assessments

  • Morris water maze (MWM)

    Hippocampal spatial memory and learning memory were assessed by the Morris Water Maze (MWM) test, which was performed as previously reported [39]. Acquired data was analyzed using SMART V3.0 (Panlab Harvard Apparatus, Germany) video tracking system. 13 animals per group were utilized.

  • Novel object recognition test (NORT)

NORT was used to assess the hippocampal-dependent recognition memory. 13 animals per group were evaluated in a room with a circular open-field arena of 40 cm in diameter surrounded by black curtains and constant illumination (30 lx) as it has been previously detailed [40]. Data were analyzed by discrimination index (DI) which was calculated using the following equation:

$$ DI\, = \,\frac{B\,exploration\,time\, - \,A\,exploration\,time}{{Total\,exploration\,time}} $$

All spaces were properly cleaned with 96% ethanol between animals, in order to eliminate odor or other cues. Data was measured and represented in seconds.

Immunoblot analysis

At 6 months, 4–5 animals of each group were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the liver and hippocampus were dissected and kept at − 80 °C until use. To perform hippocampi and liver extractions, tissues were homogenized in lysis buffer (Tris HCl 1 M pH 7.4, NaCl 5 M, EDTA 0.5 M pH 8, Triton, distilled H20) containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktails (Complete Mini, EDTA-free; Protease Inhibitor cocktail tablets). Total protein concentration was determined using the Pierce™ BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo ScientificTM). Samples containing 10 µg of protein were analyzed by Western Blot as previously described [41]. Measurements were expressed in arbitrary units and all results were normalized with the corresponding loading control (Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; GAPDH). The used antibodies are detailed in Table 1.

Table 1 Primary and secondary antibodies for Western Blotting
Full size table

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

BDNF (Cusabio, China; CSB-E04505m) and amyloid β1-42 (ThermoFisher Scientific; kit KHB3441) levels in the cerebral cortex homogenate were detected by ELISA according to manufacturer’s instruction. In both cases, 7 animals per group were analyzed and absorbances were read in a Varioskan LUX Multimode Microplate Reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Amyloid β1-42 data is expressed in pg/μg protein and BDNF levels are expressed in pg/mg protein.

β-secretase activity assay kit

Hippocampal tissue from 7 animals were homogenized according to the manufacturer protocol (Abcam; Kit ab282921), and 35 µL of each sample were placed into a 96 well black plate. BACE1 Positive Control and EDANS Standard Curve were also added to the plate. Following the addition of the Reaction Mix, the plate was measured at Ex/Em = 345/500 nm in a kinetic mode for 60 min at 37 °C. Data was treated as specified in the manufacturer’s instructions.

Immunofluorescence and thioflavin-S staining

15 animals were previously anesthetized by i.p. injection of ketamine (100 mg/Kg) and xylazine (10 mg/Kg). When they were in the no-pain sleep phase, they were intracardially perfused with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) diluted in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (PB). After perfusion, brains were removed and stored in 4% PFA at 4 °C overnight (O/N). The next day, the solution was replaced by 4% PFA + 30% sucrose. Coronal sections of 20 μm were obtained by a cryostat (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) and they were kept in a cryoprotectant solution and stored at − 20 °C until use. To perform the experiments, the free-floating technique was used. Briefly, free-floating sections were rinsed in 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.35, and after that in PBS-T (PBS 0.1 M, 0.2% Triton X-100). Then they were incubated in a blocking solution (10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% Triton X-100, PBS 0.1 M + 0.2% gelatin) for 1–2 h at room temperature. Later, sections were washed with PBS-T and incubated O/N at 4 °C with the corresponding primary antibody (Table 2). Brain slices were washed with PBS-T and incubated with the corresponding secondary antibody (Table 2) for 2 h at room temperature. Thioflavin-S (ThS) protocol was carried out as previously described [42]. Finally, sections were treated with 0.1 μg/mL Hoechst (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, United States), used for cell nuclei staining, for 8 min in the dark at room temperature and washed with 0.1 M PBS. All reagents, containers and materials exposed to Hoechst were properly handled and processed to avoid any cytotoxic contamination. Ultimately, all the samples were mounted in Superfrost® microscope slides using Fluoromount medium (EMS) and were left to dry O/N. Image acquisition was obtained using an epifluorescence microscope (BX61 Laboratory Microscope, Melville, NY OlympusAmerica Inc.) and quantified by ImageJ. 5 animals per group were analyzed.

Table 2 Primary and secondary antibodies for Immunofluorescence
Full size table

Hippocampal dendritic spine density analysis

To carry out the spine density analysis, 5 mice in each group were sacrificed by cervical dislocation. Brains were isolated and processed following the instructions of the GolgiStainTM Kit purchased from FD Neurotechnologies, Inc. (FD Rapid GolgiStainTM Kit; Cat #PK401). Images were obtained with a Leica Thunder Microscope (Leica Thunder Imager; Leica Microsystems). The quantification was carried out in 2 different zones, dentate gyrus (DG) and CA1, and 5 neurons per zone and animal were selected. DG was quantified in the secondary branches of the final fragment of the dendrites. In the DG, when analyzing the terminal fragment, 20 µm of dendrite were always left uncounted, and the counting was performed in the following 30 µm. In secondary branches, 20 µm from the ramification were left uncounted and the following 30 µm were analyzed. In CA1, two zones of the neuron were distinguished: CA1 basal and CA1 apical. In CA1 basal, the final part of the dendrite was selected, and again 20 µm of dendrite were always left uncounted, and the counting were performed in the following 30 µm. In CA1 apical, the secondary branches were selected, leaving 20 µm uncounted and analyzing the next 30 µm. Spine density was expressed as the number of spines per 30 μm of dendrite. 5 animals per group were analyzed.

Statistical analysis

All results are presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Normality test was performed, when data followed a parametric distribution and more than two groups were compared, significant differences were determined by one-way analysis of variances (ANOVA), followed by Tukey’s post hoc test for comparison among groups. When only two groups were compared, Student’s t test was performed. However, when data followed a non-parametric distribution, Mann–Whitney and Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed to compare two or more than three groups, respectively. All analyses were obtained using Graph Pad Prism software for Mac version 6.01; Graph Pad Software, Inc.

Results

RHE-HUP does not reverse the body weight increase and glucose pathway alterations induced by HFD at peripheral level

As it has been widely described, the consumption of HFD is related to the increase in body weight, as well as to hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in mice [43, 44]. As expected, animals following a HFD showed a significant 6 month increased body weight compared with WT CT SALINE group (p < 0.0001) (Fig. 2a). The RHE-HUP treatment did not attenuate the weight gain induced by the HFD. Regarding glucose and insulin metabolism, HFD feeding showed a significant effect in both GTT (WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD SALINE p < 0.001; WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.001) and ITT (WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD SALINE p < 0.001; WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.001), regardless of the treatment (Fig. 2b–e). Because the insulin receptor substrate protein 2 (IRS2) is a key target in the hormonal control of metabolism, we measured the hepatic IRS2 protein level. A significant decrease in APP/PS1 HFD SALINE compared with WT CT SALINE (p < 0.01) was detected. However, no significant reduction was observed after the RHE-HUP treatment (Fig. 2f) suggesting that RHE-HUP does not regulate metabolic alterations observed after HFD consumption.

Fig. 2
figure 2

a. Analysis and representation of changes in body weight (n = 13 animals per group). b. GTT and d. ITT experiment profiles (n = 13 animals per group). Area under curve (AUC) data were calculated from the time point 0 until the end of the experiment for both c. GTT and e. ITT. f. Semi-quantification of IRS2 levels in the liver where two representative samples out of four or five per group are shown (n = 4–5). All results were represented as mean ± SD. Statistical analysis was conducted through one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test, except in the case of the analysis of weights, where the Kruskal–Wallis test was performed. In all cases, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001

Full size image

RHE-HUP treatment improves brain insulin signaling and attenuates Tau hyperphosphorylation

Alterations in the insulin signaling pathway have been observed in brains of AD patients [45, 46], in which IRS2 represents an important component. Our results demonstrated that the hippocampal levels of IRS2 were significantly decreased in the group APP/PS1 HFD SALINE compared with the control group (p < 0.05). Surprisingly, a recovery in IRS2 was observed after RHE-HUP treatment (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3). Since the increase in IRS2 levels has been related with an attenuation in Tau hyperphosphorylation [47], we evaluated the glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK3β), a main Tau kinase converging between AD and insulin resistance. Our results displayed a non-significant upward trend in the group APP/PS1 HFD SALINE when compared with WT CT SALINE. By contrast, those animals treated with RHE-HUP showed a significant decrease of GSK3β phosphorylation levels in tyrosine 216 when compared to the APP/PS1 HFD SALINE mice (p < 0.05) (Fig. 3). Regarding Tau phosphorylation in the hippocampus, our results showed a significant increase in P-Tau levels at serine 404 and serine 396 in APP/PS1 HFD SALINE mice when comparing with WT CT SALINE (P-Tauser404 p < 0.05; P-Tauser396 p < 0.001) and this effect was significantly reduced after RHE-HUP treatment (P-Tauser404 p < 0.01; P-Tauser396 p < 0.05). Our data did not show any significant changes in total Tau protein levels (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Semi-quantification of hippocampal insulin signaling pathway related proteins and Tau. Two representative samples out of four or five per group are shown (n = 4–5). All results were represented as mean ± SD. Groups were compared against each other using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test, except in the case of Tau protein, where Kruskal–Wallis was performed. In all cases, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p p < 0.01

Full size image

RHE-HUP reduces Aβ plaques by regulating APP processing and Aβ degradation in APP/PS1 mice fed with HFD

To assess the state of Aβ burden in the hippocampus and cortex, ThS was used for detection of senile plaques. Our results demonstrated a significant decrease in the number of plaques after treatment in both regions, as shown in the images (Fig. 4a–c) and in the graphic representation (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4d–e). This result was corroborated with the significant reduction of Aβ (1–42) levels (p < 0.05) observed in the cortex after RHE-HUP administration (Fig. 4f). To elucidate the mechanisms by which RHE-HUP induced Aβ reduction, the analysis of APP processing and Aβ degradation was performed. Regarding the first one, full-length APP was analyzed. As expected, non-treated transgenic mice showed a significant increase in this protein level (p < 0.05) whereas these levels were reduced in those animals treated with RHE-HUP (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4h). In this line, BACE1 activity also showed a significant increase in APP/PS1 HFD SALINE when compared with WT CT SALINE (p < 0.01) and decreased after treatment (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4g).

Fig. 4
figure 4

a–c. Illustrative images of Aβ plaques in the hippocampus and cortex. Scale bar: 200 µm. Graphic representation of Aβ plaques quantification in d. hippocampus and e. cortex (n = 5 independent samples per group, with at least 5 slices analyzed per sample). In hippocampus analysis, Mann–Whitney test was performed, * p < 0.05. In cortex analysis, t-test was performed, where * p < 0.05. f. Measurement of the levels of Aβ42 peptide in the cortex (n = 7). Statistical analysis was performed by T-test, where * p < 0.05. g. Determination of β-secretase activity in the hippocampus (n = 7). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test, where * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 h. APP processing related protein levels. Two representative samples out of four or five per group are shown (n = 4–5). All results were represented as mean ± SD. Groups were compared against each other using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and **** p < 0.0001

Full size image

APP-C-terminal fragment (APP-CTF) was significantly increased in non-treated transgenic mice compared to control group whereas soluble amyloid precursor protein β fragment (sAPPβ) did not show differences in WT vs APP/PS1 HFD. However, both proteins were reduced after treatment (APP-CTF: WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.05; APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.0001; sAPPβ: WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.05; APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.05).

The insulin-degrading enzyme (IDE) is one of the main proteases involved not only in the degradation of insulin but also in that of Aβ peptide [48]. Our results showed a significant reduction in the hippocampus of APP/PS1 HFD SALINE mice compared to WT CT SALINE, levels which were recovered after RHE-HUP treatment (WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD SALINE p < 0.01; APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.05).Similarly, ADAM10, a neuroprotective protein involved in the non-amyloidogenic pathway, experimented a significant reduction in APP/PS1 HFD SALINE (p < 0.05) when compared with WT CT SALINE mice, levels that were recovered after RHE-HUP treatment, reaching values similar to those of controls (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4h).

RHE-HUP treatment decreases glial reactivity in APP/PS1 HFD mice

Increasing evidence correlates neuroinflammation with the development of AD [49, 50]. In our study, the evaluation of astrocytes and microglial reactive profile was studied in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus by detecting glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1 (IBA1), astrocyte and microglial markers, respectively (Fig. 5a–f). Our results showed a glial activation in those transgenic animals fed with HFD compared to WT and a clear reduction of this reactivity after the RHE-HUP treatment. These results were corroborated by the fluorescence intensity quantification data. A significant increase in astrogliosis and microglial activation in transgenic mice fed with HFD in comparison to the WT CT SALINE groups was found (p < 0.001). By contrast, this increase was significantly attenuated when these animals were treated with RHE-HUP (GFAP: APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.05; IBA1: APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.01) (Fig. 5 g–h).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Evaluation of inflammatory responses. Representative images for the detection of astrocytes a–c, and microglia d–f, co-stained with Hoechst for the detection of cellular nucleus (blue). Scale bar: 200 µm. Graphic representation of fluorescence intensity quantification for GFAP g and IBA1 h. In both cases, statistical analysis was performed through one-way ANOVA (n = 5) and Tukey’s post hoc test, * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. i. protein levels for TLR4 and PTP1B where two representative samples out of four or five per group are shown (n = 4–5). All results were represented as mean ± SD. Groups were compared against each other using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01

Full size image

Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and protein tyrosine phosphatase (PTP1B), both related with neuroinflammation, were analyzed in the hippocampus. In agreement with glial profile, our results showed a similar pattern where concentrations of both proteins were significantly increased in the APP/PS1 HFD SALINE group compared to WT CT SALINE (TLR4: p < 0.01; PTP1B: p < 0.05), returning to baseline levels after treatment with RHE-HUP (p < 0.01, in both cases) (Fig. 5i).

RHE-HUP increases dendritic spines density and synaptic biomarkers in APP/PS1 HFD mice

The reduction in the number of dendritic spines together with alterations in cognition has been widely demonstrated in AD patients, suggesting that they could play a key pathogenic role [51, 52]. Optical microscope images of the hippocampus are shown in Fig. 6a–c, accompanied by a representative magnification image of dendritic spines of each experimental group (Fig. 6d–f). A significant decrease in the number of dendritic spines was observed in APP/PS1 HFD SALINE when comparing with the control group (Fig. 6g–j), while in those animals treated with RHE-HUP, this reduction was reverted reaching levels similar to the control regardless of the studied area in the hippocampus (DG TERMINAL: WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD SALINE p < 0.001; APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.05. DG RAMIFICATION: WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD SALINE p < 0.0001; APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.01. CA1 BASAL: WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD SALINE p < 0.0001; APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.001. CA1 APICAL: WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD SALINE p < 0.001; APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.01.).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Optical microscope images of the hippocampus a–c and representative magnification images of dendritic spines of each experimental group d–e. g–j. Quantification of dendritic spines of each 30 µm of dendrite in different areas of the hippocampus (n = 5). Groups were compared against each other using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001 k. Representative images of synaptic proteins levels were determined, where two representative samples out of four or five per group are shown (n = 4–5). Graphs barts represent mean ± SD. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. l. Quantification of BDNF protein levels in the cortex (n = 7). Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-test, ** p < 0.01

Full size image

Different synaptic proteins involved in memory process and plasticity, such as drebrin 1 (DBN1), synaptophysin and neurexin, were measured by Western Blot. Our results showed a significant decrease in DBN1 protein levels in the APP HFD SALINE group when they were compared with the control group (p < 0.001), while DBN1 levels were rescued after RHE-HUP administration (p < 0.01). A similar pattern was observed for the other synaptic proteins studied, but in the case of synaptophysin the values did not reach statistical significance, and only a positive trend was observed (Synaptophysin: APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP P < 0.05; Neurexin: WT CT SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD SALINE p < 0.01; APP/PS1 HFD SALINE vs APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP p < 0.05) (Fig. 6k).

Moreover, one protein that deserves special mention is BDNF plays a critical role not only in the growth and development of the nervous system, but also as a modulator of synaptic plasticity, suggesting that its regulation could play a key role in the preservation of cognitive function [53]. In this line and, in accordance with the results shown above, the analysis of BDNF levels in the cortex demonstrated a significant decrease in APP/PS1 HFD SALINE in comparison with WT CT SALINE (p < 0.01). Nevertheless, the treatment with RHE-HUP resulted in an increase of BDNF (p < 0.01) (Fig. 6l).

The treatment with RHE-HUP improves the cognitive process in APP/PS1 HFD mice

It has been described that one of the most important features of APP/PS1 mice is cognitive decline in terms of memory and spatial memory [54, 55]. To demonstrate the efficacy of RHE-HUP treatment in the recovery of cognitive decline, MWM and NORT tests were performed. Regarding MWM, APP/PS1 HFD SALINE mice showed an obviously more erratic trajectory, being unable to find the platform compared with WT CT SALINE mice. However, after RHE-HUP treatment, the trajectory of APP/PS1 HFD RHE-HUP tended to return to normality (Fig. 7a–c). In Fig. 7d, the escape latency of all groups throughout the training period is shown. The training performed by the different groups demonstrated an improvement of the learning ability in those animals treated with RHE-HUP in comparison to those treated with saline. In the same line, the results obtained on the test day showed a significant increase in escape latency in the APP/PS1 HFD SALINE when they were compared with control group (p < 0.05), effect which was reverted in those animals treated with the drug (p < 0.05) (Fig. 7e). Moreover, other parameters studied in the same test, such as the number of entries on the platform or the mean distance traveled to reach it, showed the same tendency toward improvement of cognitive function after RHE-HUP administration. Regarding the number of entries, the time of crossing through the target platform was significantly reduced in non-treated animals (p < 0.01), whereas after treatment that number was recovered, reaching similar values to WT CT (p < 0.01) (Fig. 7f). In the case of the mean distance traveled to find the platform, non-treated animals swam a longer distance compared to the control group (p < 0.05), while after treatment, they reached the platform more easily (p < 0.05) (Fig. 7g). In agreement, in the NORT APP/PS1 HFD SALINE mice presented a decreased DI compared to the control group (p < 0.001), whereas the DI was recovered after treatment (p < 0.001), clearly indicating that RHE-HUP rescued mice from the memory deficit observed in this pathological model (Fig. 7h).

Fig. 7
figure 7

a–c. Representative swim paths on the memory test. Learning curves of MWM during the spatial acquisition phase d and escape latency e, entries in platform f and mean distance traveled g on test day (n = 13). One-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post- test were performed, except in the case of the analysis of entries in the platform where Krushal-Wallis was conducted. In all cases, * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01. h. NORT, Discrimination Index (DI) expressed in seconds (n = 13). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey post-test, *** p < 0.001

Full size image

Discussion

AD is nowadays recognized as a multifactorial and heterogeneous disease in which metabolic alterations play an important role [56,57,58]. Previous work has shown that RHE-HUP improves the main hallmarks of AD in APP/PS1 mice [35]. However, the effect of RHE-HUP in an AD familial model of mice with a metabolic syndrome-like was not evaluated, yet. Our results demonstrated that RHE-HUP significantly reduces neuroinflammation, Aβ deposition and Tau phosphorylation, considered some of the main underlying disease mechanisms. Additionally, RHE-HUP treatment succeeded in increasing the levels of BDNF and other synapse-related proteins in the brain, which resulted in an increase in the number of dendritic spines, improving memory and learning. However, these changes were not associated with modifications in the metabolic peripheral parameters.

HFD consumption leads to metabolic alterations, including insulin resistance and T2DM [59, 60], both conditions frequently associated with the development of dementia [41, 61]. T2DM is a complex disorder that begins with a state of insulin resistance, leading to hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia, which is known to cause different alterations in the brain. Our study confirmed that HFD induces an increase in body weight, hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in APP/PS1 mice accompanied by the downregulation of IRS2 protein levels in the liver, a protein involved in insulin signaling regulation. However, the treatment with RHE-HUP did not reverse these effects, leading us to the conclusion that the observed benefits provided by RHE-HUP may not be due to a peripheral metabolic regulation, rather to a central effect. One of the possible answers could be that this molecule was designed to hit multiple targets involved in the pathogenesis of AD, i.e., to reach biological targets located at the central nervous system. Indeed, studies performed in parallel artificial membrane permeability assays for blood-brain barrier (PAMPA-BBB) clearly demonstrated that this compound was able to enter the brain [34]. This fact was supported by the results obtained in previous studies where a reduction of Aβ levels and Tau phosphorylation leading to a memory amelioration, was observed after chronic administration of RHE-HUP to APPswe/PS-1dE9 mice [35]. Moreover, ex vivo [62,63,64] and in vivo biodistribution [65] studies with other hybrid compounds, closely related to RHE-HUP in terms of chemical structure and physicochemical properties, have demonstrated that this type of compounds readily enters the brain, some of them with more favorable brain/plasma ratio than the most prescribed anti-Alzheimer drug donepezil [65]. Very likely, this could be also the case for RHE-HUP, which might account for its preferential central vs peripheral effects observed in this work using the familial AD mouse model, challenged by high-fat diet.

Brain insulin, apart from controlling energy metabolism, is also involved in other multiple functions including synaptogenesis, synaptic remodeling, and neurotransmitter level modulation. Thus, unbalanced insulin signaling, and metabolism may lead to cognitive decline and AD [66]. IRS2, a major component of the insulin/insulin-like growth factor-1 signaling pathway and a key factor in T2DM, also has a role in synaptic plasticity, learning and memory. A study carried out by Tanokashira and colleagues found that young adult C57BL/6 J mice lacking IRS2 displayed hippocampus-associated behavioral alterations due to IRS2 deficiency-induced impairments of brain energy metabolism [67]. Our results agree with these data, since a IRS2 reduction was observed in the APP/PS1 HFD SALINE group recovering its levels after the RHE-HUP treatment. It has been also described that IRS2 signaling promotes the dephosphorylation of Tau, suggesting that failure on this pathway could lead to an hyperphosphorylation of Tau protein, considered one of the main early mechanisms of AD. Therefore, Tau phosphorylation might be a direct consequence of reduced insulin–IGF signaling during aging [47, 68]. Likewise, one of the main kinases responsible for Tau phosphorylation is GSK3β [69]. The phosphorylation of this kinase in Tyr216 leads to its own activation which results not only in the increase in Tau phosphorylation levels [70], but also contributes to neuronal death independently of Tau [71]. In agreement with this, the present study demonstrated that RHE-HUP administration significantly reduced Tau phosphorylation, by IRS2 and p-GSK3β regulation, which could explain the restoration of dendritic spine number and the resulting behavioral improvement observed in A PP/PS1 HFD mice after the treatment.

In addition to hyperphosphorylated Tau, another well-known hallmark of AD is the accumulation of β-amyloid deposits. Several studies have interconnected both processes defining Aβ plaques as the main triggers of Tau hyperphosphorylation and Tau tangle formation, as a result of an imbalance between Aβ production and Aβ clearance [14, 72]. In agreement with these previous data, we observed a significant reduction in the number of hippocampal and cortical Aβ plaques induced by RHE-HUP due to BACE1 inhibition. In turn, this correlated with the reduction of the levels of Aβ42, the most hydrophobic and aggregation-prone form of this peptide and, the predominant one in senile plaques [73, 74]. This event also explained the reduction in hyperphosphorylated Tau observed in this group.

As described by Pérez-Areales and coworkers, RHE-HUP seems to inhibit AChE [38], a prime target in AD, since the cholinergic deficit has been widely observed in AD patients and is directly responsible for the cognitive decline [75, 76]. However, the importance of this enzyme in the disease goes much further, since it has been described that it might bind to Aβ and promote its deposition [77], turning the combination of AChE + Aβ into more toxic to cells than Aβ alone [78].

Taking all this into account and according to our findings, the effect of RHE-HUP on decreasing the Aβ production and subsequent accumulation might be attributed to four main factors: (i) the inhibition of AChE, avoiding the interaction with Aβ and the consequent formation of the toxic aggregates; (ii) the inhibition of the amyloidogenic pathway by decreasing hippocampal BACE1 activity; (iii) the direct reduction of APP protein levels and (iv) the activation of the non-amyloidogenic pathway by increasing ADAM10 levels [79,80,81,82,83]. In addition, our results show that RHE-HUP treatment increased IDE levels in the hippocampus, an enzyme that not only participates in Aβ elimination, but also plays a key role in insulin degradation, all together contributing to a reduction in Aβ deposition and cognitive improvement [84].

The glial activation in the brain is also an important pathological feature of neurodegenerative diseases, including AD [85,86,87]. Although early in the disease neuroinflammation may represent a protective response, an excessive reaction can cause or contribute to the pathology [88]. Several reports have described that the presence of Aβ and Tau hyperphosphorylation activate microglia and astrocytes [89,90,91], demonstrating that microglia can play dual roles in Aβ pathogenesis. Microglia may help to eliminate Aβ aggregation, and it may facilitate Aβ accumulation through the release of neurotoxic proteases and pro-inflammatory factors, which contribute to the neuroinflammation [92,93,94,95,96]. Thus, it generates a vicious circle in which Aβ plaques potentiate the release of inflammatory molecules and, at the same time, these molecules stimulate the formation and accumulation of Aβ [97, 98]. Moreover, it is well-known that the chronic consumption of HFD increases stress in different pathways including neuroinflammation [99], contributing to the development of cognitive impairment. In this line, Wieckowska-Gacek et al. demonstrated that 4-months-old APPswe transgenic mice fed with western diet exhibited such brain neuroinflammation and accelerated amyloid pathology comparable to that induced by the administration of pro-inflammatory lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Hence, it highlighted the role that diet can play in neuroinflammation and, consequently, in AD [100]. In this sense, the observed decrease in the activation of microglia and astrocytes after RHE-HUP treatment might be due to the reduction in Tau phosphorylation and in Aβ deposition, but also to the improvement in the insulin signaling pathway at the central level observed upon treatment. Toll-like receptors play a pivotal role in brain injury and neurodegeneration, and, in CNS, they are mainly expressed in glial cells [101]. Specifically, the activation of TLR4 triggers the downstream stimulation of the nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NFK-β) and the induction of genes that encode inflammation-associated molecules and cytokines, such as IL-6 and TNF-α [102, 103]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that TLR4 deficiency protects against ethanol-induced glial activation, induction of inflammatory mediators, and apoptosis [101]. For this reason, the attenuation of the neuroinflammation observed after the RHE-HUP treatment could be related with the decrease of TLR4 levels, in agreement with previous studies which demonstrated that the treatment with resveratrol attenuated the increase in protein levels and the downstream activation of the pathway [104, 105].

In the same way, PTP1B also demonstrated a significant decrease in the RHE-HUP treated mice. Several studies have reported that the inhibition of PTP1B favors the inactivation of unfolded protein response (UPR) and neuroinflammation, thereby protecting against cognitive decline [106]. For this reason, PTP inhibitors have been suggested as a promising therapeutic modulation of microglial activation in neuroinflammatory diseases, including AD [107]. In addition, PTP1B not only has been related to this group of pathologies, but also represents a convergent point between AD and T2DM. In fact, preclinical studies have demonstrated that mice lacking PTP1B were resistant to weight gain and remained sensitive to insulin after HFD consumption [108, 109] suggesting that PTP1B downregulation could be key in order to improve the features observed in AD pathogenesis by the regulation of insulin signaling pathway and neuroinflammatory processes [110].

Moreover, in a pathological environment the released cytokines and chemokines contribute to an excessive pruning of synaptic terminals causing synaptic dysfunction and neuronal loss [111]. In fact, another important pathway in which PTP1B is involved is the BDNF/TrkB pathway [112]: PTP1B down-regulates neuronal BDNF-TrkB pathway, whereas the PTP1B inhibition stimulates BDNF signaling [113, 114]. Considering that preclinical studies suggest that the increase in BDNF levels is a suitable strategy to enhance the cognitive process [115], the decrease in PTP1B levels induced by RHE-HUP treatment observed in our results and the consequent increase in BDNF levels could explain the recovery in dendritic spines number caused by the treatment. In addition, dendritic spines loss is also related with Aβ and Tau pathology, since a study performed by Bittner et al., demonstrated that mice coexpressing mutant APP, PS1 and Tau, presented a strong loss of dendritic spines with accumulation of hyperphosphorylated Tau protein as well as soluble Aβ [116]. Therefore, the reduction already discussed in Aβ accumulation and Tau hyperphosphorylation caused by the treatment might also be contributing to the recovery of dendritic spines. These results were also accompanied by an increase in DBN1 levels. DBN1 is typically located in postsynaptic regions of excitatory synapses, and it is responsible for controlling spine function and morphology [117, 118]. Its preservation has been related to neuroprotection, and, by contrast, its reduction in the hippocampus has been linked to cognitive deficits [119, 120]. Thus, our data confirm that the increase in DBN1 could be associated with the improvement observed in cognitive functioning. In the same way, synaptophysin and neurexin showed a similar profile. Synaptophysin is a glycoprotein present in synaptic vesicles which is related to synaptic plasticity. Thus, a decrease in its levels has been related to cognitive impairment [121]. At the same time, neurexin downregulation has also been associated with cognitive impairments since it has been found to be active in synapse maturation and adaptation of synaptic strength [122]. In addition, it has been demonstrated that Aβ42 oligomers bind to neurexin, and this interaction leads to a decrease in its expression, inducing synapse pathology [123]. This would explain the increase in neurexin protein levels produced by the decrease in Aβ42 levels observed after treatment with RHE-HUP.

Recent postmortem studies in people with AD have shown that the number of dendritic spines is lower in patients with clinically evident AD compared to controls, and similar between control subjects and subjects that are cognitively normal but present the underlying biological features of AD. Thus, these observations provide cellular evidence supporting the hypothesis that dendritic spine plasticity provides a mechanism of cognitive resilience that protects people with an early stage of dementia from developing AD [124, 125]. In fact, numerous preclinical studies have related the loss of dendritic spines with hippocampus-dependent learning and memory ability impairments [126,127,128]. In the present study, RHE-HUP treatment induced the recovery in the number of dendritic spines, which was accompanied by an improvement in hippocampal-dependent recognition memory assessed by NORT, as well as spatial and learning memory evaluated by MWM.

In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that the multi-target compound RHE-HUP restores the number of dendritic spines and enhances cognition in APP/PS1 mice, whose pathology is exacerbated with HFD consumption, by regulation of brain insulin signaling and neuroinflammation, which contributes to the reduction of hyperphosphorylated Tau and Aβ levels (Fig. 8). However, we did not observe peripheral metabolic regulation induced by the drug administration, suggesting that the improvement observed in our model is exclusively due to a regulation at central level. These results support RHE-HUP as a new promising molecule for the treatment of AD, also in those individuals with metabolic disturbances.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Schematic representation of the effects of RHE-HUP treatment in APP/PS1 mice fed with HFD. The figure shows the pathological mechanisms targeted by RHE-HUP that could explain the improvement in cognition observed in this double pathological model

Full size image

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

Aa:

Amino acids

Aβ:

Amyloid-beta

AChE:

Acetylcholinesterase

AD:

Alzheimer’s disease

APP:

Amyloid precursor protein

APP-CTF:

APP-C-terminal fragment

BACE1:

β-Secretase

BDNF:

Brain derived neurotrophic factor

DBN1:

Drebrin 1

DG:

Dentate gyrus

DI:

Discrimination index

GFAP:

Glial fibrillary acidic protein

(p)-GSK3β:

(Phospho)-Glycogen synthase kinase-3β

GTT:

Glucose tolerance test

HFD:

High-fat diet

IBA1:

Ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1

IDE:

Insulin-degrading enzyme

IRS2:

Insulin receptor substrate protein 2

ITT:

Insulin tolerance test

LPS:

Lipopolysaccharide

LTP:

Long-term potentiation

MWM:

Morris water maze

NFKβ:

Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells

NFTs:

Neurofibrillary tangles

NORT:

Novel object recognition test

PB:

Phosphate buffer

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PTP1B:

Protein tyrosine phosphatase

RHE-HUP:

Rhein-huprine

sAPPβ:

Soluble amyloid precursor protein β fragment

SD:

Standard deviation

TLR4:

Toll-like receptor 4

T2DM:

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

UPR:

Unfolded protein response

WT:

Wild-type

References

  1. Forstl H, Burns A, Levy R, Cairns N, Luthert P, Lantos P. Neuropathological correlates of behavioural disturbance in confirmed Alzheimer’s disease. Br J Psychiatry. 1993;163(3):364–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jahn H. Memory loss in Alzheimer’s disease. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2022;15(4):445–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheltens P, Blennow K, Breteler MMB, de Strooper B, Frisoni GB, Salloway S, et al. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 2016;388(10043):505–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes DE, Yaffe K. The projected effect of risk factor reduction on Alzheimer’s disease prevalence. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(9):819–28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Gauthier S, Panisset M, Nalbantoglu J, Poirier J. Alzheimer’s disease: current knowledge, management and research. CMAJ. 1997;157:8.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wegmann S, Biernat J, Mandelkow E. A current view on Tau protein phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2021;69:131–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rahman MM, Lendel C. Extracellular protein components of amyloid plaques and their roles in Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Mol Neurodegener. 2021;16(1):1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson CA, Doms RW, Lee VMY. Intracellular APP processing and Aβ production in Alzheimer disease. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1999;58(8):787–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guo JP, Arai T, Miklossy J, McGeer PL. Aβ and tau form soluble complexes that may promote self aggregation of both into the insoluble forms in Alzheimer’s diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(6):1953–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Takashima A. GSK-3 is essential in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimer’s Dis. 2006;9(s3):309–17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Stoothoff WH, Johnson GVW. Tau phosphorylation: physiological and pathological consequences. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1739(2–3):280–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Reddy PH. Abnormal tau, mitochondrial dysfunction, impaired axonal transport of mitochondria, and synaptic deprivation in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Res. 2011;1415:136–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Vaquer-Alicea J, Diamond MI, Joachimiak LA. Tau strains shape disease. Acta Neuropathol. 2021;142(1):57–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Alvarez G, Muñoz-Montaño JR, Satrústegui J, Avila J, Bogónez E, Díaz-Nido J. Regulation of tau phosphorylation and protection against β-amyloid-induced neurodegeneration by lithium possible implications for Alzheimer’s disease. Bipolar Disord. 2002;4(3):153–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Inestrosa NC, Sagal JP, Colombres M. Acetylcholinesterase interaction with Alzheimer amyloid beta. Subcell Biochem. 2005;38:299–317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. García-Ayllón MS, Small DH, Avila J, Sáez-Valero J. Revisiting the role of acetylcholinesterase in Alzheimers disease: cross-talk with β-tau and p-amyloid. Front Mol Neurosci. 2011. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2011.00022.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mesulam M. The cholinergic lesion of Alzheimer’s disease: pivotal factor or side show? Learn Mem. 2004;11(1):43–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bachurin SO, Bovina EV, Ustyugov AA. Drugs in clinical trials for Alzheimer’s disease: the major trends. Med Res Rev. 2017;37(5):1186–225.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. de de Paula JRV, Guimarães FM, Diniz BS, Forlenza OV. Neurobiological pathways to Alzheimer’s disease: amyloid-beta, TAU protein or both? Dement Neuropsychol. 2009;3(3):188–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. González A, Calfío C, Churruca M, Maccioni RB. Glucose metabolism and AD: evidence for a potential diabetes type 3. Alzheimer Res Ther. 2022;14(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao AA, Sridhar GR, Das UN. Elevated butyrylcholinesterase and acetylcholinesterase may predict the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer’s disease. Med Hypotheses. 2007;69(6):1272–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vieira MNN, Lima-Filho RAS, de Felice FG. Connecting Alzheimer’s disease to diabetes: underlying mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets. Neuropharmacology. 2018;136:160–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Awad N, Gagnon M, Messier C. The relationship between impaired glucose tolerance, type 2 diabetes, and cognitive function. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010;26(8):1044–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nooyens ACJ, Baan CA, Spijkerman AMW, Monique Verschuren WM. Type 2 diabetes and cognitive decline in middle-aged men and womenthe doetinchem cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):1964–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Luchsinger JA. Type 2 diabetes and cognitive impairment: linking mechanisms. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;30(s2):S185–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. de La Monte SM, Wands JR. Alzheimer’s disease is type 3 diabetes-evidence reviewed. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2008;2(6):1101–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. de La Monte SM, Tong M, Lester-Coll N, Plater M, Wands JR. Therapeutic rescue of neurodegeneration in experimental type 3 diabetes: relevance to Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;10(1):89–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kroner Z. The relationship between Alzheimer’s disease and diabetes: type 3 diabetes. Altern Med Rev. 2009;14(4):373–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wolf PA, Beiser A, Elias MF, Au R, Vasan RS, Seshadri S. Relation of obesity to cognitive function: importance of central obesity and synergistic influence of concomitant hypertension the framingham heart study. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2007;4(2):111–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Taylor HA, Przemylska L, Clavane EM, Meakin PJ. BACE1: more than just a β-secretase. Obes Rev. 2022;23(7):e13430.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dekeryte R, Franklin Z, Hull C, Croce L, Kamli-Salino S, Helk O, et al. The BACE1 inhibitor LY2886721 improves diabetic phenotypes of BACE1 knock-in mice. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2021;1867(7):166149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Plucińska K, Dekeryte R, Koss D, Shearer K, Mody N, Whitfield PD, et al. Neuronal human BACE1 knockin induces systemic diabetes in mice. Diabetologia. 2016;59(7):1513–23.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Muñoz-Torrero D. Multitarget anti-Alzheimer hybrid compounds do they work in vivo? design of hybrid molecules for drug development. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Viayna E, Sola I, Bartolini M, de Simone A, Tapia-Rojas C, Serrano FG, et al. Synthesis and multitarget biological profiling of a novel family of rhein derivatives as disease-modifying anti-Alzheimer agents. J Med Chem. 2014;57(6):2549–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Serrano FG, Tapia-Rojas C, Carvajal FJ, Cisternas P, Viayna E, Sola I, et al. Rhein-huprine derivatives reduce cognitive impairment, synaptic failure and amyloid pathology in AβPPswe/PS-1 mice of different ages. Curr Alzheimers Res. 2016;13(9):1017–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiao SS, le Bu X, Liu YH, Zhu C, Wang QH, Shen LL, et al. Sex dimorphism profile of Alzheimer’s disease-type pathologies in an APP/PS1 mouse model. Neurotox Res. 2015;29(2):256–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang J, Tanila H, Puoliväli J, Kadish I, van Groen T. Gender differences in the amount and deposition of amyloidβ in APPswe and PS1 double transgenic mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2003;14(3):318–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Pérez-Areales FJ, Betari N, Viayna A, Pont C, Espargaró A, Bartolini M, et al. Design, synthesis and multitarget biological profiling of second-generation anti-Alzheimer rhein–huprine hybrids. Future Med Chem. 2017;9(10):965–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Ettcheto M, Sánchez-López E, Gómez-Mínguez Y, Cabrera H, Busquets O, Beas-Zarate C, et al. Peripheral and central effects of memantine in a mixed preclinical mice model of obesity and familial Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobiol. 2018;55(9):7327–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ettcheto M, Petrov D, Pedros I, Alva N, Carbonell T, Beas-Zarate C, et al. Evaluation of neuropathological effects of a high-fat diet in a presymptomatic Alzheimer’s disease stage in APP/PS1 mice. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;54(1):233–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Petrov D, Pedrós I, Artiach G, Sureda FX, Barroso E, Pallàs M, et al. High-fat diet-induced deregulation of hippocampal insulin signaling and mitochondrial homeostasis deficiences contribute to Alzheimer disease pathology in rodents. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1852(9):1687–99.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Busquets O, Ettcheto M, Pallàs M, Beas-Zarate C, Verdaguer E, Auladell C, et al. Long-term exposition to a high fat diet favors the appearance of β-amyloid depositions in the brain of C57BL/6J mice a potential model of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Mech Ageing Dev. 2017;162:38–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yang Y, Smith DL, Keating KD, Allison DB, Nagy TR. Variations in body weight, food intake and body composition after long-term high-fat diet feeding in C57BL/6J mice. Obesity. 2014;22(10):2147–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Avtanski D, Pavlov VA, Tracey KJ, Poretsky L. Characterization of inflammation and insulin resistance in high-fat diet-induced male C57BL/6J mouse model of obesity. Animal Model Exp Med. 2019;2(4):252–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Gabbouj S, Ryhänen S, Marttinen M, Wittrahm R, Takalo M, Kemppainen S, et al. Altered insulin signaling in Alzheimer’s disease brain-special emphasis on pi3k-akt pathway. Front Neurosci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2019.00629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bedse G, di Domenico F, Serviddio G, Cassano T. Aberrant insulin signaling in Alzheimer’s disease: current knowledge. Front Neurosci. 2015;9(MAY):204.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Schubert M, Brazil DP, Burks DJ, Kushner JA, Ye J, Flint CL, et al. Insulin receptor substrate-2 deficiency impairs brain growth and promotes Tau phosphorylation. J Neurosci. 2003;23(18):7084–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Kurochkin IV, Goto S. Alzheimer’s β-amyloid peptide specifically interacts with and is degraded by insulin degrading enzyme. FEBS Lett. 1994;345(1):33–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Hoozemans JJM, Rozemuller AJM, van Haastert ES, Eikelenboom P, van Gool WA. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease wanes with age. J Neuroinflamm. 2011;8(1):1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Morales I, Guzmán-Martínez L, Cerda-Troncoso C, Farías GA, Maccioni RB. Neuroinflammation in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease a rational framework for the search of novel therapeutic approaches. Front Cell Neurosci. 2014;8(1):112.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Boros BD, Greathouse KM, Gentry EG, Curtis KA, Birchall EL, Gearing M, et al. Dendritic spines provide cognitive resilience against Alzheimer’s disease. Ann Neurol. 2017;82(4):602–14.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Knobloch M, Mansuy IM. Dendritic spine loss and synaptic alterations in Alzheimer’s disease. Mol Neurobio. 2008;37(1):73–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Li Y, Li F, Qin D, Chen H, Wang J, Wang J, et al. The role of brain derived neurotrophic factor in central nervous system. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022;14:1065.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Puoliväli J, Wang J, Heikkinen T, Heikkilä M, Tapiola T, van Groen T, et al. Hippocampal Aβ42 levels correlate with spatial memory deficit in APP and PS1 double transgenic mice. Neurobiol Dis. 2002;9(3):339–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Su D, Zhao Y, Xu H, Wang B, Chen X, Chen J, et al. Isoflurane exposure during mid-adulthood attenuates age-related spatial memory impairment in APP/PS1 transgenic mice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(11):e50172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Gong CX, Liu F, Iqbal K. Multifactorial hypothesis and multi-targets for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(s1):S107–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Carmo Carreiras M, Mendes E, Jesus Perry M, Paula Francisco A, Marco-Contelles J. The multifactorial nature of Alzheimer’s disease for developing potential therapeutics. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(15):1745–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Iqbal K, Grundke-Iqbal I. Alzheimer’s disease, a multifactorial disorder seeking multitherapies. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6(5):420–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. An Y, Xu W, Li H, Lei H, Zhang L, Hao F, et al. High-fat diet induces dynamic metabolic alterations in multiple biological matrices of rats. J Proteome Res. 2013;12(8):3755–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Nesci V, Russo E, Arcidiacono B, Citraro R, Tallarico M, Constanti A, et al. Metabolic alterations predispose to seizure development in high-fat diet-treated mice: the role of metformin. Mol Neurobiol. 2020;57(11):4778–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Kang S, Lee YH, Lee JE. Metabolism-centric overview of the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease. Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(3):479–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Galdeano C, Viayna E, Sola I, Formosa X, Camps P, Badia A, et al. Huprine-tacrine heterodimers as anti-amyloidogenic compounds of potential interest against Alzheimer’s and prion diseases. J Med Chem. 2012;55(2):661–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Sola I, Aso E, Frattini D, López-González I, Espargaró A, Sabaté R, et al. Novel levetiracetam derivatives that are effective against the Alzheimer-like phenotype in mice: synthesis, in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo efficacy studies. J Med Chem. 2015;58(15):6018–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Sola I, Viayna E, Gómez T, Galdeano C, Cassina M, Camps P, et al. Multigram synthesis and in vivo efficacy studies of a novel multitarget anti-Alzheimer’s compound. Molecules. 2015;20(3):4492–515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Viayna E, Coquelle N, Cieslikiewicz-Bouet M, Cisternas P, Oliva CA, Sánchez-López E, et al. Discovery of a potent dual inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase with antioxidant activity that alleviates Alzheimer-like pathology in old APP/PS1 mice. J Med Chem. 2020;64(1):812–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Craft S, Cholerton B, Baker LD. Insulin and Alzheimer’s disease: untangling the web. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(s1):S263–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Tanokashira D, Wang W, Maruyama M, Kuroiwa C, White MF, Taguchi A. Irs2 deficiency alters hippocampus-associated behaviors during young adulthood. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2021;559:148–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Ochiai T, Sano T, Nagayama T, Kubota N, Kadowaki T, Wakabayashi T, et al. Differential involvement of insulin receptor substrate (IRS)-1 and IRS-2 in brain insulin signaling is associated with the effects on amyloid pathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2021;159:105510.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Anderton BH, Betts J, Blackstock WP, Brion JP, Chapman S, Connell J, et al. Sites of phosphorylation in tau and factors affecting their regulation. Biochem Soc Symp. 2001;67:73–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Das TK, Jana P, Chakrabarti SK, Abdul Hamid MRW. Curcumin downregulates GSK3 and Cdk5 in scopolamine-induced alzheimer’s disease rats abrogating Aβ 40/42 and Tau hyperphosphorylation. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2019;3(1):257–67.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Toral-Rios D, Pichardo-Rojas PS, Alonso-Vanegas M, Campos-Peña V. GSK3β and Tau protein in Alzheimer’s disease and epilepsy. Front Cell Neurosci. 2020;14:19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Hardy J, Selkoe DJ. The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science. 2002;297(5580):353–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Klein AM, Kowall NW, Ferrante RJ. Neurotoxicity and oxidative damage of beta amyloid 1–42 versus beta amyloid 1–40 in the mouse cerebral cortex. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;893:314–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Maccioni RB, Muñoz JP, Barbeito L. The molecular bases of Alzheimer’s disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. Arch Med Res. 2001;32(5):367–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Minger SL, Esiri MM, McDonald B, Keene J, Carter J, Hope T, et al. Cholinergic deficits contribute to behavioral disturbance in patients with dementia. Neurology. 2000;55(10):1460–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Mega MS. The cholinergic deficit in Alzheimer’s disease: impact on cognition, behavior and function. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2000;3(2):S3-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Geula C, Greenberg BD, Mesulam MM. Cholinesterase activity in the plaques, tangles and angiopathy of Alzheimer’s disease does not emanate from amyloid. Brain Res. 1994;644(2):327–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Alvarez A, Opazo C, Alarcón R, Garrido J, Inestrosa NC. Acetylcholinesterase promotes the aggregation of amyloid-β-peptide fragments by forming a complex with the growing fibrils. J Mol Biol. 1997;272(3):348–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Bandyopadhyay S, Goldstein LE, Lahiri DK, Rogers JT. Role of the APP non-amyloidogenic signaling pathway and targeting β-secretase as an alternative drug target for treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14(27):2848–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Coimbra JRM, Marques DFF, Baptista SJ, Pereira CMF, Moreira PI, Dinis TCP, et al. Highlights in BACE1 inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease treatment. Front Chem. 2018;6(MAY):178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Espeseth AS, Xu M, Huang Q, Coburn CA, Jones KLG, Ferrer M, et al. Compounds that bind APP and inhibit Aβ processing in vitro suggest a novel approach to Alzheimer disease therapeutics. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(18):17792–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Farkhondeh T, Forouzanfar F, Roshanravan B, Samarghandian S. Curcumin effect on non-amyloidogenic pathway for preventing Alzheimer’s disease. Biointerface Res Appl Chem. 2019;9(4):4085–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Guo T, Hobbs DW. Development of BACE1 inhibitors for Alzheimer’s disease. Curr Med Chem. 2006;13(15):1811–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Pivovarova O, Höhn A, Grune T, Pfeiffer AFH, Rudovich N. Insulin-degrading enzyme: new therapeutic target for diabetes and Alzheimer’s disease? Ann Med. 2016;48(8):614–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Zhang F, Jiang L. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2015;11:243.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Hong H, Kim BS, Im HI. Pathophysiological role of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders. Int Neurourol J. 2016;20(Suppl 1):S2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Chen WW, Zhang X, Huang WJ. Role of neuroinflammation in neurodegenerative diseases (review). Mol Med Rep. 2016;13(4):3391–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Agostinho P, Cunha RA, Oliveira C. Neuroinflammation, oxidative stress and the pathogenesis of Alzheimers disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2012;16(25):2766–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Verri M, Pastoris O, Dossena M, Aquilani R, Guerriero F, Cuzzoni G, et al. Mitochondrial alterations, oxidative stress and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012;25(2):345–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Metcalfe MJ, Figueiredo-Pereira ME. Relationship between Tau pathology and neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. Mt Sinai J Med. 2010;77(1):50–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Ismail R, Parbo P, Madsen LS, Hansen AK, Hansen KV, Schaldemose JL, et al. The relationships between neuroinflammation, beta-amyloid and tau deposition in Alzheimer’s disease: a longitudinal PET study. J Neuroinflamm. 2020;17(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. Hu J, Akama KT, Krafft GA, Chromy BA, van Eldik LJ. Amyloid-β peptide activates cultured astrocytes: morphological alterations, cytokine induction and nitric oxide release. Brain Res. 1998;785(2):195–206.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Szczepanik AM, Ringheim GE. IL-10 and glucocorticoids inhibit Aβ(1–42)- and lipopolysaccharide-induced pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine induction in the central nervous system. J Alzheimers Dis. 2003;5(2):105–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Grathwohl SA, Kälin RE, Bolmont T, Prokop S, Winkelmann G, Kaeser SA, et al. Formation and maintenance of Alzheimer’s disease β-amyloid plaques in the absence of microglia. Nat Neurosci. 2009;12(11):1361–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. LeBlanc AC, Xue R, Gambetti P. Amyloid precursor protein metabolism in primary cell cultures of neurons, astrocytes, and microglia. J Neurochem. 1996;66(6):2300–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Majumdar A, Capetillo-Zarate E, Cruz D, Gouras GK, Maxfield FR. Degradation of Alzheimer’s amyloid fibrils by microglia requires delivery of CIC-7 to lysosomes. Mol Biol Cell. 2011;22(10):1664–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Cai Z, Zhao B, Ratka A. Oxidative stress and β-amyloid protein in Alzheimer’s disease. NeuroMol Med. 2011;13(4):223–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Yana MH, Wang X, Zhu X. Mitochondrial defects and oxidative stress in Alzheimer disease and Parkinson disease. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;62:90–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Reilly AM, Tsai AP, Lin PB, Ericsson AC, Oblak AL, Ren H. Metabolic defects caused by high-fat diet modify disease risk through inflammatory and amyloidogenic pathways in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nutrients. 2020;12(10):2977.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Wiȩckowska-Gacek A, Mietelska-Porowska A, Chutorański D, Wydrych M, Długosz J, Wojda U. Western diet induces impairment of liver-brain axis accelerating. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021;13:136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Alfonso-Loeches S, Pascual-Lucas M, Blanco AM, Sanchez-Vera I, Guerri C. Pivotal role of TLR4 receptors in alcohol-induced neuroinflammation and brain damage. J Neurosci. 2010;30(24):8285–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Rahimifard M, Maqbool F, Moeini-Nodeh S, Niaz K, Abdollahi M, Braidy N, et al. Targeting the TLR4 signaling pathway by polyphenols: a novel therapeutic strategy for neuroinflammation. Ageing Res Rev. 2017;36:11–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Yang Y, Wu J, Wang J. Original article a database and functional annotation of NF-κB target genes. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2016;9(5):7986–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Azimi H, Khakshur AA, Abdollahi M, Rahimi R. Potential new pharmacological agents derived from medicinal plants for the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Pancreas. 2015;44(1):11–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Zhang Z, Chen N, Liu JB, Wu JB, Zhang J, Zhang Y, et al. Protective effect of resveratrol against acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide via inhibiting the myd88-dependent Toll-like receptor 4 signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2014;10(1):101–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Liu B, Ou G, Chen Y, Zhang J. Inhibition of protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B protects against sevoflurane-induced neurotoxicity mediated by ER stress in developing brain. Brain Res Bull. 2019;146:28–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Song GJ, Kim J, Kim JH, Song S, Park H, Zhang ZY, et al. Comparative analysis of protein tyrosine phosphatases regulating microglial activation. Exp Neurobiol. 2016;25(5):252.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. Elchebly M, Payette P, Michaliszyn E, Cromlish W, Collins S, Loy AL, et al. Increased insulin sensitivity and obesity resistance in mice lacking the protein tyrosine phosphatase-1B gene. Science. 1999;283(5407):1544–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Klaman LD, Boss O, Peroni OD, Kim JK, Martino JL, Zabolotny JM, et al. Increased energy expenditure, decreased adiposity, and tissue-specific insulin sensitivity in protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B-deficient mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2000;20(15):5479–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Nakandakari SCBR, Muñoz VR, Kuga GK, Gaspar RC, Sant’Ana MR, Pavan ICB, et al. Short-term high-fat diet modulates several inflammatory, ER stress, and apoptosis markers in the hippocampus of young mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2019;79:284–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. DiSabato DJ, Quan N, Godbout JP. Neuroinflammation: the devil is in the details. J Neurochem. 2016;139:136–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Vieira MNN, Lyra Silva NME, Ferreira ST, de Felice FG. Protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B): a potential target for Alzheimer’s therapy? Front Aging Neurosci. 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2017.00007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Krishnan N, Krishnan K, Connors CR, Choy MS, Page R, Peti W, et al. PTP1B inhibition suggests a therapeutic strategy for Rett syndrome. J Clin Invest. 2015;125(8):3163–77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Ozek C, Kanoski SE, Zhang ZY, Grill HJ, Bence KK. Protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B (PTP1B) is a novel regulator of central brain-derived neurotrophic factor and tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) signaling. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(46):31682–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Miranda M, Morici JF, Zanoni MB, Bekinschtein P. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor: a key molecule for memory in the healthy and the pathological brain. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00363.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Bittner T, Fuhrmann M, Burgold S, Ochs SM, Hoffmann N, Mitteregger G, et al. Multiple events lead to dendritic spine loss in triple transgenic Alzheimer’s disease mice. PLoS ONE. 2010;5(11):e15477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Hayashi K, Ishikawa R, Ye LH, He XL, Takata K, Kohama K, et al. Modulatory role of drebrin on the cytoskeleton within dendritic spines in the rat cerebral cortex. J Neurosci. 1996;16(22):7161–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  118. Sekino Y, Kojima N, Shirao T. Role of actin cytoskeleton in dendritic spine morphogenesis. Neurochem Int. 2007;51(2–4):92–104.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Counts SE, He B, Nadeem M, Wuu J, Scheff SW, Mufson EJ. Hippocampal drebrin loss in mild cognitive impairment. Neurodegener Dis. 2012;10(1–4):216–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  120. Harigaya Y, Shoji M, Shirao T, Hirai S. Disappearance of actin-binding protein, drebrin, from hippocampal synapses in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci Res. 1996;43(1):87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Zhang X, Shen X, Dong J, Liu WC, Song M, Sun Y, et al. Inhibition of reactive astrocytes with fluorocitrate ameliorates learning and memory impairment through upregulating CRTC1 and synaptophysin in ischemic stroke rats. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2019;39(8):1151–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Knight D, Xie W, Boulianne GL. Neurexins and neuroligins: recent insights from invertebrates. Mol Neurobiol. 2011;44(3):426.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  123. Naito Y, Tanabe Y, Lee AK, Hamel E, Takahashi H. Amyloid-β oligomers interact with neurexin and diminish neurexin-mediated excitatory presynaptic organization. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  124. Walker CK, Herskowitz JH. Dendritic spines: mediators of cognitive resilience in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroscientist. 2020;27(5):487–505.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  125. Herms J, Dorostkar MM, Landsteiner K. Dendritic spine pathology in neurodegenerative diseases. Annu Rev Pathol. 2016;11(1):221–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Cao Z, Yang X, Zhang H, Wang H, Huang W, Xu F, et al. Aluminum chloride induces neuroinflammation, loss of neuronal dendritic spine and cognition impairment in developing rat. Chemosphere. 2016;151:289–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Chabrier MA, Cheng D, Castello NA, Green KN, LaFerla FM. Synergistic effects of amyloid-beta and wild-type human tau on dendritic spine loss in a floxed double transgenic model of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Dis. 2014;64:107–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  128. Kandimalla R, Manczak M, Yin X, Wang R, Reddy PH. Hippocampal phosphorylated Tau induced cognitive decline, dendritic spine loss and mitochondrial abnormalities in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Hum Mol Genet. 2018;27(1):30–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (SAF2017-84283-R, PID2020-118127RB-I00, PID2021-122473OA-I00, PID2021-122187NB-C32, PID2021-123462OB-I00), the Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria (PI19/00854) and co founded by the Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional (FEDER), theCentre for Network Biomedical Research on Neurodegenerative Diseases CB06/05/0024) and the Generalitat de Catalunya (2014SGR‑525). This research was partially funded by PRIME/H2020-SC1-BHC-2018–2020, Ref: 847879) and Programa Estatal de Fomento de la investigación Científica y Técnica de Excelencia Maria de Maeztu (CEX2021-001159-M), Universidad de Barcelona, UBNEURO Instituto de neurociencias. AC is a recipient of the Instituto de Salud Calos III Sara Borrell fellowship (grant CD22/00125). ESL is supported by the Requalification of the Spanish University System Program. JO and ME are Serra Húnter fellows.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Therapeutic Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Science, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Triana Espinosa-Jiménez, Antoni Camins & Miren Ettcheto

  2. Institute of Neuroscience, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Triana Espinosa-Jiménez, Jordi Olloquequi, Ester Verdaguer, Carme Auladell, Antoni Camins & Miren Ettcheto

  3. Biomedical Research Networking Centre in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBERNED), Madrid, Spain

    Triana Espinosa-Jiménez, Amanda Cano, Elena Sánchez-López, Jordi Olloquequi, Jaume Folch, Ester Verdaguer, Carme Auladell, Antoni Camins & Miren Ettcheto

  4. Department of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Technology and Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Amanda Cano & Elena Sánchez-López

  5. Ace Alzheimer Center Barcelona–International University of Catalunya (UIC), Barcelona, Spain

    Amanda Cano

  6. Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (IN2UB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Amanda Cano & Elena Sánchez-López

  7. Unit of Synthesis and Biomedical Applications of Peptides, IQAC-CSIC, 08034, Barcelona, Spain

    Elena Sánchez-López

  8. Department of Biochemistry and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Jordi Olloquequi

  9. Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Talca, Chile

    Jordi Olloquequi

  10. Institut d’Investigació Sanitària Pere Virgili (IISPV), 43201, Reus, Spain

    Jaume Folch & Mònica Bulló

  11. Nutrition and Metabolic Health Research Group, Institute of Health Pere Virgili—IISPV, 43201, Reus, Spain

    Jaume Folch & Mònica Bulló

  12. CIBER Physiology of Obesity and Nutrition (CIBEROBN), Carlos III Health Institute, 28029, Madrid, Spain

    Mònica Bulló

  13. Department of Cellular Biology, Physiology and Immunology, Faculty of Biology, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Ester Verdaguer & Carme Auladell

  14. Laboratory of Medicinal Chemistry (CSIC Associated Unit), Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Caterina Pont & Diego Muñoz-Torrero

  15. Institute of Biomedicine (IBUB), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Diego Muñoz-Torrero

  16. Department of Basic Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC), Sant Cugat del Vallès, Spain

    Antoni Parcerisas

  17. Unitat de Farmacologia i Farmacognòsia, Facultat de Farmàcia i Ciències de l’Alimentació, Universitat de Barcelona, Av. Joan XXIII 27/31, 08028, Barcelona, Spain

    Miren Ettcheto

Authors
  1. Triana Espinosa-Jiménez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda Cano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Elena Sánchez-López
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jordi Olloquequi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jaume Folch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Mònica Bulló
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ester Verdaguer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Carme Auladell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Caterina Pont
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Diego Muñoz-Torrero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Antoni Parcerisas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Antoni Camins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Miren Ettcheto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conducted the research: TEJ, AC, KP, DMT, AP, EV. Designed the research and coordinated the study: ACE, ME, EV, CA, JO, AC. Conducted the statistical analysis: TEJ. Drafted the paper: TEJ, AC, ESL, JO, JF, MB, EV, CA, DMT, ACE, ME. Funding acquisition: AC, ESL, MB, CA, DMT, ACE, ME. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miren Ettcheto.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the experiments on APP/PS1 transgenic mice were performed in accordance with the European Community Council Directive 86/609/EEC and the procedures were established by the Department d’Agricultura, Ramaderia i Pesca of the Generalitat de Catalunya.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Espinosa-Jiménez, T., Cano, A., Sánchez-López, E. et al. A novel rhein-huprine hybrid ameliorates disease-modifying properties in preclinical mice model of Alzheimer’s disease exacerbated with high fat diet. Cell Biosci 13, 52 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-023-01000-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-023-01000-y

Keywords

Cell & Bioscience

ISSN: 2045-3701

Contact us