Skip to main content
Download PDF

cGAS inhibition alleviates Alu RNA-induced immune responses and cytotoxicity in retinal pigmented epithelium

Cell & Bioscience volume 12, Article number: 116 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The degeneration of retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) cells results in severe diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD) that causes blindness in millions of individuals.

Results

We report that targeting GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase (cGAS) alleviates Alu RNA-induced immune responses and cytotoxicity in RPE. We find that the deletion of cGAS in RPE inhibits the Alu RNA-stimulated interferon production. cGAS deficiency also protects RPE from cell death triggered by Alu RNA. Importantly, two natural chemicals, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) and resveratrol (RSVL), are effective in suppressing the immunogenic and cytotoxic effect of Alu RNA in RPE.

Conclusions

Our findings further demonstrate the crucial role of cGAS in the Alu RNA-induced RPE damage and present EGCG and RSVL as potential therapies for AMD and other RPE degeneration-related conditions.

Introduction

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is a prevalent disease that causes blindness in aged individuals [1,2,3]. Millions of people worldwide are suffering from vision loss as a result of AMD [1,2,3]. There are two main forms of AMD, neovascular AMD and geographic atrophy (GA) [1, 2, 4, 5]. The neovascular AMD has been effectively treated through anti-angiogenesis strategies, such as targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) [1, 2, 5,6,7]. In contrast, GA, the advanced form of AMD, is still untreatable [2, 4, 5, 8,9,10,11,12]. RPE cells form a monolayer of tissue that play critical roles in supporting the homeostasis of retina [2,3,4]. Studies indicated that the RPE degeneration is not only a key characteristic manifestation of GA, but also a major pathological factor that triggers GA [1, 4, 9, 10]. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms underlying the degeneration of RPE is critical for the development of therapies for GA.

Alu RNA is a type of noncoding RNAs transcribed from Alu elements, which are the most abundant repetitive elements in the genome of humans [13,14,15]. It is believed that there are about 1 million copies of Alu elements in each genome [13, 15]. A growing number of evidence showed that these repetitive elements shape the genome both structurally and functionally [13, 15]. Interestingly, recent studies illustrated the pathogenic role of Alu RNAs in GA and found that the accumulation of Alu RNAs in RPE induced cell death through the activation of inflammasome [14] and the cytosolic DNA sensor, cGAS [9].

As a primary intracellular DNA sensor, cGAS detects the cytosolic DNA to elicit the downstream immune responses, such as the production of type I interferons (IFNs) [16,17,18]. The emergence of DNA in the cytoplasm can be a result of either cellular damage or microbial infections [19]. Alu RNAs were found to activate cGAS by inducing the release of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA), which is a ligand for cGAS [9, 20]. cGAS activation then drives the inflammasome activation and the RPE degeneration in AMD [9]. Thus, the activation of cGAS is an important upstream event during the Alu RNAs-induced RPE degeneration. It is therefore suggested that cGAS inhibition may be a potential mean to preserve RPE health and to treat GA. Several cGAS inhibitors were identified recently. For example, two natural chemicals, epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG) [16] and resveratrol (RSVL) [21], were showed to suppress cGAS activation efficiently. In the current study, we explored whether these cGAS-inhibiting reagents could be used to ameliorate the Alu RNAs-induced immune responses and cell death in RPE.

Results

dsRNA induced the interferon production in RPE cells

Alu RNA accumulation is implicated in GA [14]. To mimic this condition, we synthesized Alu RNA transcripts and transfected ARPE-19, an RPE cell line, with Alu RNAs. As expected, the introducing of Alu RNAs into the cytoplasm of ARPE-19 cells triggered the robust expression of IFN (Fig. 1a). The intracellular nucleic acid-stimulated expression of IFN is dependent on the transcriptional factor, interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and the phosphorylation level of IRF3 can be used to reflect its activation [22,23,24]. We then detected the phosphorylation of IRF3 using immunoblotting with the specific antibodies against the phosphorylated IRF3. We showed that the transfection of Alu RNAs strongly stimulated the activation of IRF3 (Fig. 1b). We also observed the Alu RNA-induced IFN expression at different time points post transfection and found that Alu RNAs triggered the expression of IFN in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 1c, d). We next confirmed these findings by measuring the production of IFN using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Fig. 1e). Further, using the synthetic analog of double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid [poly(I:C)], we obtained the consistent results (Fig. 1f–j). Together, these data suggested that Alu RNAs and other dsRNAs induce the interferon production in RPE cells.

Fig.1
figure 1

dsRNA induced the interferon production in ARPE-19 cells. a, b ARPE-19 cells were transfected with Alu RNA (0.5 μg mL−1 or 1 μg mL−1) for 8 h. IFNB mRNA levels was analyzed by qPCR (a) and immunoblot analysis of indicated proteins (b). c, d ARPE-19 cells were transfected with Alu RNA (1 μg mL−1) for indicated hours and IFNB mRNA levels was analyzed by qPCR (c), immunoblot analysis of indicated proteins (d). e ARPE-19 cells were transfected with Alu RNA (1 μg mL−1) for 24 h and the secreted IFN-β was measured by ELISA. f, g ARPE-19 cells were transfected with poly(I:C) as indicated concentrations for 4 h and IFNB mRNA levels was analyzed by qPCR (f), and the expression of indicated proteins were analyzed with immunoblotting (g). h, i ARPE-19 cells were transfected with poly(I:C) (0.2 μg mL−1) as indicated and IFNB mRNA levels was analyzed by qPCR (h). The expression of indicated proteins were analyzed with immunoblotting (i). j ARPE-19 cells were transfected with poly(I:C) (1 μg mL−1) for 24 h and the secreted IFN-β was measured by ELISA. Data are mean ± s.e.m. of three independent experiments (e and j) and mean ± s.e.m. of three technical repeats (a, c, f and h). ND, not detected (e and j). GAPDH (b, d, g and i), loading controls. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments

Full size image

cGAS is required for Alu RNA-induced IFN expression

As previous publication indicated that the Alu RNA stimulates cGAS activation through inducing the release of mtDNA [9], we next tested this in cells that we studied. We first generated cGAS null RPE cells using CRISPR/Cas9. As expected, cGAS deletion abolished different types of DNA-induced IFN expression (Fig. 2a–c). By detecting the HT-DNA-induced phosphorylation of IRF3, we obtained consistent results (Fig. 2d). We then transfected both wild-type (WT) and cGAS–/– ARPE-19 cells with Alu RNAs and confirmed that cGAS is required for Alu RNA-induced IFN expression (Fig. 2e, f). We also used the WT and CGAS–/– U937 cells, the monocytic cell line that is widely used for cGAS study, to examine the role of cGAS in response to Alu RNA challenge. In U937 cells, cGAS deficiency disrupted the DNA-induced IFN expression (Fig. 2g). The cGAS-mediated response to Alu RNA seemed to be a universal mechanism, as the Alu RNA-stimulated IFN expression was also attenuated in cGAS null U937 cells (Fig. 2h). Thus, cGAS is a key mediator in the signaling pathway downstream of Alu RNA in RPE.

Fig.2
figure 2

cGAS is critical for Alu RNA-induced interferon expression. a–c WT and CGAS−/− ARPE-19 cells were transfected with plasmid DNA (4 μg mL−1) for 6 h (a), genomic DNA (4 μg mL−1) for 6 h (b) or HT-DNA (2 μg mL−1)for 6 h (c) and IFNB mRNA levels were analyzed by qPCR. d Immunoblot analysis of indicated proteins in WT and CGAS−/− ARPE-19 cells that transfected with HT-DNA. e WT and CGAS−/− ARPE-19 cells were transfected with Alu RNA (1 μg mL−1) for 8 h and IFNB mRNA levels was analyzed by qPCR. f Immunoblot analysis of indicated proteins in WT and CGAS−/− ARPE-19 cells that transfected with Alu RNA. g, h WT and CGAS−/− U937 cells were transfected with HT-DNA (2 μg mL−1) (g) or Alu RNA (1 μg mL−1) (h) for 3 h and IFNB mRNA levels was analyzed by qPCR. Data are mean ± s.e.m. of three technical repeats (a, b, c, e, g and h). GAPDH (d and f), loading controls. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments

Full size image

cGAS is critical for Alu RNA-induced RPE death

To assess the Alu RNA-induced cell death in ARPE-19 cells, we transfected WT and cGAS–/– cells with Alu RNAs and harvested the cells 48 h post transfection. The cells were then stained with Annexin V and propidium iodide (PI), which respectively indicate the early apoptotic cell death and the late apoptotic or other forms of cell death [25]. Using flow cytometry, we analyzed the percentage of dead cells in the transfected ARPE-19. We showed that while cGAS deletion did not lead to detectable cell death, it significantly reduced the Alu RNA-induced death of ARPE-19 (Fig. 3a, b). Thus, cGAS deficiency may prevent RPE from Alu RNA-induced cell death. Our data further suggested that inhibition of cGAS could be used to rescue the Alu RNA-associated RPE degeneration.

Fig.3
figure 3

cGAS is critical for Alu RNA-induced cell death. a Annexin V/PI analysis by flow cytometry of WT and CGAS−/− ARPE-19 cells transfected with Alu RNA (4 μg mL−1) for 48 h or non-transfected (Ctrl). b The percentage of dead cells in (a) was quantified. Data are mean ± s.e.m. of three independent experiments, *P < 0.05, two-tailed t-test (b)

Full size image

EGCG/RSVL inhibits cGAS activation

EGCG and RSVL were respectively showed to inhibit the activation of cGAS [16, 21]. We therefore examined their effects in ARPE-19 cells. To do so, ARPE-19 cells were pretreated with either EGCG or RSVL, followed by the transfection of DNA, which specifically activates cGAS. Our results showed that the pretreatment of EGCG significantly suppressed the DNA-induced IFN expression in RPE cells (Fig. 4a). We also showed that EGCG effectively blocked the DNA-triggered phosphorylation of IRF3 (Fig. 4b). Similarly, we further showed that the pretreatment of RSVL also led to the inhibition of DNA-induced cGAS activation (Fig. 4c, d). Because EGCG and RSVL were reported to inhibit cGAS activation through GTPase-activating protein SH3 domain–binding protein 1(G3BP1) [16, 21], we confirmed the expression of G3BP1 in both ARPE-19 and hTERT RPE-1 cell lines (Fig. 4e). Further, using EGCG- and RSVL-conjugated Sepharose beads, we performed pull-down assays and showed that both EGCG and RSVL can selectively bind to G3BP1 protein (Fig. 4f, g).

Fig.4
figure 4

EGCG/RSVL inhibits cGAS activation. a–d ARPE-19 cells were transfected with HT-DNA (2 μg mL−1) for 6 h, following a 3-h pretreatment with EGCG or RSVL as indicated, qPCR analysis of IFNB mRNA levels (a and c). Immunoblot analysis of expression levels of proteins, EGCG (20 μM) or RSVL (40 μM) were respectively used (b and d). e Immunoblot analysis of indicated proteins of ARPE-19 and hTERT RPE-1. f, g Pull-down assays with EGCG/RSVL-conjugated Sepharose beads in ARPE-19 cells. EGCG/RSVL-binding proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies (f and g). h, i Cell viability of ARPE-19 cells treated by EGCG (h) or RSVL (i) as indicated. Data are mean ± s.e.m. of three independent experiments (a, c, h and i), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, two-tailed t-test (a and c). GAPDH (b, d, e, f and g), loading controls. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments

Full size image

We next examined the cytotoxicity of both EGCG and RSVL on ARPE-19 cells. To do so, we cultured ARPE-19 cells in the presence of EGCG or RSVL for 48 h and analyzed the cell death using CellTiter assays. Our data showed that EGCG did not induce obvious cell death at 200 μM (Fig. 4h), while it significantly suppressed cGAS at 20 μM (Fig. 4a). RSVL exhibited marginal toxic effect on ARPE-19 cells (Fig. 4i). Thus, both EGCG and RSVL can be tolerated by ARPE-19 cells, at the concentrations we used to inhibit cGAS activation.

EGCG/RSVL suppresses Alu RNA-induced IFN expression

We then tested the effect of EGCG on Alu RNA-transfected RPE cells. When the cells were pretreated with increasing amount of EGCG followed by the Alu RNA transfection, we found that EGCG effectively dampened Alu RNA-induced IFN expression at 5 μM. Strikingly, 40 μM of EGCG almost blocked IFN expression triggered by Alu RNA (Fig. 5a). Consistently, EGCG treatment inhibited the Alu RNA-induced phosphorylation of IRF3 (Fig. 5b). Although the inhibitory effect of RSVL was not as potent as EGCG, our data showed that RSVL can markedly reduce the Alu RNA-induced IFN expression and the activation of IRF3 (Fig. 5c, d). We also treated the cells with EGCG and RSVL together to explore whether there was a synergistic effect of these two chemicals. As shown in Fig. 5e, EGCG + RSVL did not obviously inhibit the Alu RNA-induced IFN expression further, probably because the effect of EGCG alone was efficient enough. Moreover, with hTERT RPE-1 cells, we confirmed the effect of EGCG and RSVL (Fig. 5f, g). Using poly(I:C), we obtained the similar data indicating that both EGCG and RSVL were effective in attenuating dsRNA-induced IFN expression (Fig. 5h–k). Taken together, both EGCG and RSVL can be used to inhibit the dsRNA-triggered IFN expression.

Fig.5
figure 5

EGCG/RSVL suppresses Alu RNA-induced interferon expression. a–e ARPE-19 cells were transfected with Alu RNA (1 μg mL−1) for 8 h, following a 3-h pretreatment with EGCG or RSVL as indicated. qPCR analysis of IFNB mRNA levels (a, c and e). Immunoblot analysis of indicated proteins, EGCG (20 μM) or RSVL (40 μM) were respectively used (b and d). f, g hTERT RPE-1 cells were transfected with Alu RNA (1 μg mL−1) for 8 h, following a 3-h pretreatment with EGCG or RSVL as indicated. qPCR analysis of IFNB mRNA levels. h–k ARPE-19 cells were transfected with poly(I:C) (0.2 μg mL−1) for 4 h, following a 3-h pretreatment with EGCG or RSVL as indicated. qPCR analysis of IFNB mRNA levels (h and j). Immunoblot analysis of indicated proteins, EGCG (20 μM) or RSVL (40 μM) were respectively used (i and k). Data are mean ± s.e.m. of three technical repeats (a, c, h and j) and mean ± s.e.m. of three independent experiments (e, f and g), *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, two-tailed t test (f and g). GAPDH (b, d, i and k), loading controls. Data are representative of at least two independent experiments

Full size image

EGCG/RSVL restrained Alu RNA-induced cell death of RPE

As Alu RNA significantly induced cell death in ARPE-19 cells (Fig. 3a, b) and cGAS deficiency prevented such cell death (Fig. 3a, b). We reasoned that EGCG and RSVL may have the effect in restraining Alu RNA-induced cell death in RPE cells. We then verified our hypothesis by treating ARPE-19 cells with EGCG prior to the Alu RNA-transfection. Our data showed that EGCG significantly recured the cell death triggered by Alu RNA transfection (Fig. 6a, b). RSVL also showed a similar effected in preventing cell death of RPE in the condition of Alu RNA challenging (Fig. 6c, d).

Fig.6
figure 6

EGCG/RSVL suppresses Alu RNA-induced cell death. a Annexin V/PI analysis by flow cytometry of ARPE-19 cells transfected with Alu RNA (4 μg mL−1) for 48 h or non-transfected (Ctrl), following a 3-h pretreatment of EGCG (20 μM). b The percentage of dead cells in (a) was quantified. c Annexin V/PI analysis by flow cytometry of ARPE-19 cells transfected with Alu RNA (4 μg mL−1) for 48 h, following a 3-h pretreatment of RSVL (40 μM). d The percentage of dead cells in (c) was quantified. Data are mean ± s.e.m. of three independent experiments, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, two-tailed t-test (b and d)

Full size image

Taken together, our data suggested that inhibition of cGAS by EGCG or RSVL could be a potential treatment for Alu RNA-induced RPE degeneration. Our study thereby presenting these natural chemicals as possible therapies for GA.

Discussion

AMD, especially the advanced form, GA, is a prevalent, severe, and currently untreatable disease that causes vision-loss in millions of individuals [3, 8, 14, 26]. The degeneration of RPE cells has been known as a major player in the pathogenesis of GA [3, 8, 14, 26]. However, the lack of detailed molecular mechanisms of the RPE degeneration has hampered the development of effective therapies for GA [1]. Recently, a series of exciting works highlighted the critical role of cGAS in the Alu RNA-induced RPE death [8, 9, 14]. In the current study, we showed that inhibition of cGAS with natural chemicals protected RPE from Alu RNA-triggered cell death. We first showed that the deletion of cGAS in RPE dampened the Alu RNA-stimulated interferon production. cGAS-deficient RPE cells were resistant to Alu RNA-induced cell death. Importantly, we found that two natural chemicals, EGCG and RSVL, were effective in suppressing the immunogenic and cytotoxic effect of Alu RNA on RPE. Thus, our findings further demonstrated the crucial role of cGAS in the Alu RNA-induced RPE damage and present EGCG and RSVL as potential treatments for RPE degeneration-related conditions, such as AMD.

cGAS is a cytoplasmic DNA sensor that responsible for the detection of invading pathogens by sensing the emerging of DNAs in the cytosol [19]. The aberrant activation of cGAS by self-DNA can be a major cause for a type of human diseases [16, 18]. For example, the insufficient clearance of self-DNAs derived from the transcription of endogenous retroviruses or retrotransposons led to the accumulation of self-DNAs in the cytoplasm, which chronically stimulate the activation of cGAS [18, 27]. In RPE cells, elevated transcription of Alu element results in the release of mtDNAs, which activate cGAS and its downstream production of interferons, and the activation of cGAS is required for the further activation inflammasome [8, 9, 14]. These events finally caused the degeneration of RPE cells. Our data suggested that the Alu RNA-mtDNA release-cGAS activation could be a universal mechanism in different cells. Thus, cGAS is a key target for the treatment of many intracellular nucleic acid-related diseases.

NLRP3 Inflammasome is a key molecular machinery assembled in response to a variety of stimuli [28,29,30,31]. Besides the infection-related danger signal molecules, such as nigericin [30, 32,33,34] and double stranded RNAs [35], the endogenous damaged-associated molecules were also found to trigger the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome [35, 36]. The activation of inflammasomes, including NLRP3 inflammasome, is essential for the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18, and the inducing of inflammation-prone cell death called pyroptosis [36,37,38,39,40]. The aberrant activation of NLRP3 inflammasome was found in many human diseases, including Alzheimer’s diseases, type 2 diabetes, and gout [14, 39, 41,42,43,44,45,46,47]. Notably, in addition to inhibiting the activation of cGAS, EGCG was also reported to suppresses the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome [16, 48,49,50,51]. Moreover, a recent report showed that EGCG can also attenuate the mtDNA synthesis and thereby block NLRP3 inflammasome activation [48].

Besides Alu RNA-mtDNA releasing pathway, Alu RNA may also trigger the intracellular RNA sensor-mediated immune responses. EGCG and RSVL were recently reported to block intracellular RNA-sensing signaling [21]. The inhibitory effect of these two chemicals were mainly attributed to the inhibition of a key factor, G3BP1 [16, 21, 52]. Interestingly, G3BP1 was also a core organizer for the assembly of stress granules (SG), which is an important molecular condensation assembled in response to stress signals, such as the emergence of irregular RNA molecules in the cytoplasm [16, 53,54,55]. Although we did not detect the formation of SGs upon Alu RNA challenges in our study, it is very likely that Alu RNA will trigger the assembly of SG. Thus, through targeting G3BP1, EGCG and RSVL could preserve RPE health by executing the inhibitory effects at multiple layers of the dysregulated immune responses during RPE degeneration. As natural chemicals, both EGCG and RSVL are abundant in nature and are easy to acquire from plants [16, 21, 56]. Our study therefore suggests these chemicals as tangible lead compounds to prevent the development of GA.

Conclusions

Our findings further demonstrate the crucial role of cGAS in the Alu RNA-induced RPE damage and present EGCG and RSVL as potential therapies for AMD and other RPE degeneration-related conditions.

Materials and methods

Reagents

Anti-p-IRF3 (ab76493) and anti-IRF3 (ab68481) were from Abcam; EGCG (E4143), RSVL (R5010) and HT-DNA (D6898) were from Sigma-Aldrich; Poly(I:C) (tlrl-pic) was from InvivoGen; Anti-G3BP1 (13057-2-AP) was from Proteintech Group; Plasmid DNA, used as the DNA stimulator, was an empty vector plasmid (pCDX-Tet-On) and amplified with PureYield Plasmid Midiprep System (A2492, Progema); Genomic DNAs were purified using StarSpin Animal DNA Kit (D111-01, GenStar); Anti-human cGAS and anti-human GAPDH antibodies were gifts from Dr. Tao Li at National Center of Biomedical Analysis, Beijing, China.

Cell culture and transfection

ARPE-19 cells were cultured in Advanced DMEM/F12 medium containing 10% Fetal Bovine Serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 mg mL−1 penicillin, 100 mg mL−1 streptomycin. Cells were grown in a 5% CO2 incubator (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at 37 °C. All cell lines were tested to be mycoplasma free by PCR.

Transfection of poly(I:C), HT-DNA and Alu RNA were performed with Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen).

Cell viability assay

ARPE-19 cells were seeded into 96-well plates and incubated with EGCG or RSVL at indicated concentrations for 48 h. CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (G3580, Promega) was performed to analyze the cell viability according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

Annexin V and PI staining

WT and CGAS−/− ARPE-19 cells were transfected with Alu RNA (4 μg mL−1) for 48 h, with or without a 3-h pretreatment of EGCG or RSVL. The Annexin V- and PI-positive cells were then measured by flow cytometer (BD Accuritm C6 Plus analyzer) using the Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (P04D03, Gene-Protein Link).

RNA extraction and quantitative PCR (qPCR)

Total RNAs were isolated from cells with TRIZOL reagent (93,289, Sigma-Aldrich) and reverse transcribed with PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa, RR037A). qPCR was performed with Powerup SYBR Green Master Mix (A25742, Thermo Fisher Scientific) on an ABI StepOnePlus system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR data was analyzed by StepOnePlus software. The sequences for qPCR primers are listed below. mRNA level of human GAPDH was used for normalization.

Human IFNB, sense: AGGACAGGATGAACTTTGAC,

anti-sense: TGATAGACATTAGCCAGGAG.

Human GAPDH, sense: GAGTCAACGGATTTGGTCGT,

anti-sense: TTGATTTTGGAGGGATCTCG.

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout in cells

For targeting CGAS with CRISPR/Cas9 in ARPE-19 cells, we used a LentiCRISPR v2 construct (Addgene, #98290). The single guide RNA (sgRNA) sequences of CGAS (sg-hCGAS: 5ʹ-CACCGAAGTGCGACTCCGCGTTCAG-3′) was designed using website of Dr. F. Zhang’s lab (http://crispr.mit.edu/). The lentiCRISPR-sgRNA was co-transfected with psPAX2 (Addgene, #12260) and pVSVg (Addgene, #8454) into HEK293T cells for 48 h to generate lentivirus. ARPE-19 cells were infected with lentivirus for 48 h, followed by culturing with puromycin (2 μg mL−1) for 7 days. Protein expression was analyzed by Western blotting.

Immunoblotting

Cells were lysed with lysis buffer (20 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 0.5% Nonidet P-40, 250 mM NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, 3 mM EGTA, 2 mM dithiothreitol) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 04,693,132,001). Cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes. The transferred PVDF membranes were blocked by 5% milk for 1 h at room temperature and subjected to primary antibody incubation at 4℃ for overnight. Protein bands were visualized with enhanced chemiluminescence (ThermoFisher Scientific).

Alu RNA transcription

Alu RNA were transcribed using MEGAshortscript™ Kit (AM1354) in vitro according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Pull-down assay

EGCG/RSVL was conjugated with cyanogen bromide (CNBr)-activated Sepharose 4B (GE Healthcare). Cells were lysed in lysis buffer (Tris–HCl 20 mM, pH 7.5; NaCl 10 mM; 0.5% Nonidet P-40; EDTA 3 mM, EGTA 3 mM) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, 04693132001). After centrifugation at 20000g for 20 min at 4 °C, the supernatants were incubated with EGCG/RSVL-conjugated Sepharose 4B for 3 h at 4 °C. Proteins were analyzed by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ARPE-19 cells were seeded into 12-well plates at a density of 2 × 105 cells per well and treated as indicated. The secreted interferon in cell culture medium was analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits (EHC026b.96, Neobioscience, for human) according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

Quantification and statistical analysis

A standard two-tailed unpaired Student’s t-test was used for statistical analysis of two groups. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. Graphs and statistical analysis were performed using GraphPad Prism (version 8.0). P values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Flow cytometry data were analyzed by FlowJo (version 10).

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

RPE:

Retinal pigmented epithelium

AMD:

Age-related macular degeneration

cGAS:

GMP-AMP (cGAMP) synthase

EGCG:

Epigallocatechin gallate

RSVL:

Resveratrol

GA:

Geographic atrophy

VEGFA:

Vascular endothelial growth factor A

IFNs:

Type I interferons

mtDNA:

Mitochondrial DNA

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

dsRNA:

Double-stranded RNA

poly(I:C):

Polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid

G3BP1:

GTPase-activating protein SH3 domain–binding protein 1

SG:

Stress granules

References

  1. Ambati J, Atkinson JP, Gelfand BD. Immunology of age-related macular degeneration. Nat Rev Immunol. 2013;13(6):438–51.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ambati J, Fowler BJ. Mechanisms of age-related macular degeneration. Neuron. 2012;75(1):26–39.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanus J, Anderson C, Wang S. RPE necroptosis in response to oxidative stress and in AMD. Ageing Res Rev. 2015;24(Pt B):286–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma R, Bose D, Maminishkis A, Bharti K. Retinal pigment epithelium replacement therapy for age-related macular degeneration: are we there yet? Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 2020;60:553–72.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Holz FG, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Fleckenstein M. Recent developments in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration. J Clin Investig. 2014;124(4):1430–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosenfeld P, Brown D, Heier J, Boyer D, Kaiser P, Chung C, Kim R. Ranibizumab for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1419–31.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown DM, Kaiser PK, Michels M, Soubrane G, Heier JS, Kim RY, Sy JP, Schneider S. Ranibizumab versus verteporfin for neovascular age-related macular degeneration. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(14):1432–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaneko H, Dridi S, Tarallo V, Gelfand BD, Fowler BJ, Cho WG, Kleinman ME, Ponicsan SL, Hauswirth WW, Chiodo VA, et al. DICER1 deficit induces Alu RNA toxicity in age-related macular degeneration. Nature. 2011;471(7338):325–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kerur N, Fukuda S, Banerjee D, Kim Y, Fu D, Apicella I, Varshney A, Yasuma R, Fowler BJ, Baghdasaryan E, et al. cGAS drives noncanonical-inflammasome activation in age-related macular degeneration. Nat Med. 2018;24(1):50–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ambati J, Ambati BK, Yoo SH, Ianchulev S, Adamis AP. Age-related macular degeneration: etiology, pathogenesis, and therapeutic strategies. Surv Ophthalmol. 2003;48(3):257–93.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrara N. Vascular endothelial growth factor and age-related macular degeneration: from basic science to therapy. Nat Med. 2010;16(10):1107–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong WL, Su X, Li X, Cheung CMG, Klein R, Cheng C-Y, Wong TY. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(2):e106–16.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hasler J, Strub K. Alu elements as regulators of gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(19):5491–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tarallo V, Hirano Y, Gelfand BD, Dridi S, Kerur N, Kim Y, Cho WG, Kaneko H, Fowler BJ, Bogdanovich S, et al. DICER1 loss and Alu RNA induce age-related macular degeneration via the NLRP3 inflammasome and MyD88. Cell. 2012;149(4):847–59.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Batzer MA, Deininger PL. Alu repeats and human genomic diversity. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(5):370–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu ZS, Cai H, Xue W, Wang M, Xia T, Li WJ, Xing JQ, Zhao M, Huang YJ, Chen S, et al. G3BP1 promotes DNA binding and activation of cGAS. Nat Immunol. 2019;20(1):18–28.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zierhut C, Funabiki H. Regulation and consequences of cGAS activation by Self-DNA. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30(8):594–605.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen Q, Sun L, Chen ZJ. Regulation and function of the cGAS-STING pathway of cytosolic DNA sensing. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(10):1142–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wu J, Sun L, Chen X, Du F, Shi H, Chen C, Chen ZJ. Cyclic GMP-AMP is an endogenous second messenger in innate immune signaling by cytosolic DNA. Science. 2013;339(6121):826–30.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. West AP, Khoury-Hanold W, Staron M, Tal MC, Pineda CM, Lang SM, Bestwick M, Duguay BA, Raimundo N, MacDuff DA, et al. Mitochondrial DNA stress primes the antiviral innate immune response. Nature. 2015;520(7548):553–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cai H, Liu X, Zhang F, Han QY, Liu ZS, Xue W, Guo ZL, Zhao JM, Sun LM, Wang N, et al. G3BP1 inhibition alleviates intracellular nucleic acid-induced autoimmune responses. J Immunol. 2021;206(10):2453–67.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bowie A. The STING in the tail for cytosolic DNA-dependent activation of IRF3. Sci Signal. 2012;5(214):pe9.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keating SE, Baran M, Bowie AG. Cytosolic DNA sensors regulating type I interferon induction. Trends Immunol. 2011;32(12):574–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Crow YJ, Manel N. Aicardi-Goutieres syndrome and the type I interferonopathies. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015;15(7):429–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang L, Tixeira R, Caruso S, Atkin-Smith GK, Baxter AA, Paone S, Hulett MD, Poon IK. Monitoring the progression of cell death and the disassembly of dying cells by flow cytometry. Nat Protoc. 2016;11(4):655–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kanagasingam Y, Bhuiyan A, Abramoff MD, Smith RT, Goldschmidt L, Wong TY. Progress on retinal image analysis for age related macular degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2014;38:20–42.

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hopfner KP, Hornung V. Molecular mechanisms and cellular functions of cGAS-STING signalling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(9):501–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Xian H, Liu Y, Rundberg Nilsson A, Gatchalian R, Crother TR, Tourtellotte WG, Zhang Y, Aleman-Muench GR, Lewis G, Chen W, et al. Metformin inhibition of mitochondrial ATP and DNA synthesis abrogates NLRP3 inflammasome activation and pulmonary inflammation. Immunity. 2021;54(7):1463-1477 e1411.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gross CJ, Mishra R, Schneider KS, Medard G, Wettmarshausen J, Dittlein DC, Shi H, Gorka O, Koenig PA, Fromm S, et al. K(+) Efflux-independent NLRP3 inflammasome activation by small molecules targeting mitochondria. Immunity. 2016;45(4):761–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Munoz-Planillo R, Kuffa P, Martinez-Colon G, Smith BL, Rajendiran TM, Nunez G. K(+) efflux is the common trigger of NLRP3 inflammasome activation by bacterial toxins and particulate matter. Immunity. 2013;38(6):1142–53.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Broz P, Dixit VM. Inflammasomes: mechanism of assembly, regulation and signalling. Nat Rev Immunol. 2016;16(7):407–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mariathasan S, Weiss DS, Newton K, McBride J, O’Rourke K, Roose-Girma M, Lee WP, Weinrauch Y, Monack DM, Dixit VM. Cryopyrin activates the inflammasome in response to toxins and ATP. Nature. 2006;440(7081):228–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mortimer L, Moreau F, MacDonald JA, Chadee K. NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition is disrupted in a group of auto-inflammatory disease CAPS mutations. Nat Immunol. 2016;17(10):1176–86.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sharif H, Wang L, Wang WL, Magupalli VG, Andreeva L, Qiao Q, Hauenstein AV, Wu Z, Nunez G, Mao Y, et al. Structural mechanism for NEK7-licensed activation of NLRP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2019;570(7761):338–43.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wen H, Miao EA, Ting JP. Mechanisms of NOD-like receptor-associated inflammasome activation. Immunity. 2013;39(3):432–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Swanson KV, Deng M, Ting JP. The NLRP3 inflammasome: molecular activation and regulation to therapeutics. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19(8):477–89.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sharma BR, Kanneganti TD. NLRP3 inflammasome in cancer and metabolic diseases. Nat Immunol. 2021;22(5):550–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. He WT, Wan H, Hu L, Chen P, Wang X, Huang Z, Yang ZH, Zhong CQ, Han J. Gasdermin D is an executor of pyroptosis and required for interleukin-1beta secretion. Cell Res. 2015;25(12):1285–98.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Guo H, Callaway JB, Ting JP. Inflammasomes: mechanism of action, role in disease, and therapeutics. Nat Med. 2015;21(7):677–87.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Broz P, Pelegrin P, Shao F. The gasdermins, a protein family executing cell death and inflammation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(3):143–57.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Wen H, Ting JP, O’Neill LA. A role for the NLRP3 inflammasome in metabolic diseases–did Warburg miss inflammation? Nat Immunol. 2012;13(4):352–7.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Masters SL, Dunne A, Subramanian SL, Hull RL, Tannahill GM, Sharp FA, Becker C, Franchi L, Yoshihara E, Chen Z, et al. Activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome by islet amyloid polypeptide provides a mechanism for enhanced IL-1beta in type 2 diabetes. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(10):897–904.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Halle A, Hornung V, Petzold GC, Stewart CR, Monks BG, Reinheckel T, Fitzgerald KA, Latz E, Moore KJ, Golenbock DT. The NALP3 inflammasome is involved in the innate immune response to amyloid-beta. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(8):857–65.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Muruve DA, Petrilli V, Zaiss AK, White LR, Clark SA, Ross PJ, Parks RJ, Tschopp J. The inflammasome recognizes cytosolic microbial and host DNA and triggers an innate immune response. Nature. 2008;452(7183):103–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Martinon F, Pétrilli V, Mayor A, Tardivel A, Tschopp J. Gout-associated uric acid crystals activate the NALP3 inflammasome. Nature. 2006;440(7081):237–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Xu C, Lu Z, Luo Y, Liu Y, Cao Z, Shen S, Li H, Liu J, Chen K, Chen Z, et al. Targeting of NLRP3 inflammasome with gene editing for the amelioration of inflammatory diseases. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4092.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Wen H, Gris D, Lei Y, Jha S, Zhang L, Huang MT, Brickey WJ, Ting JP. Fatty acid-induced NLRP3-ASC inflammasome activation interferes with insulin signaling. Nat Immunol. 2011;12(5):408–15.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Lee HE, Yang G, Park YB, Kang HC, Cho YY, Lee HS, Lee JY. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents acute gout by suppressing NLRP3 inflammasome activation and mitochondrial DNA synthesis. Molecules. 2019;24(11):2138.

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tsai PY, Ka SM, Chang JM, Chen HC, Shui HA, Li CY, Hua KF, Chang WL, Huang JJ, Yang SS, et al. Epigallocatechin-3-gallate prevents lupus nephritis development in mice via enhancing the Nrf2 antioxidant pathway and inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Free Radic Biol Med. 2011;51(3):744–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Jhang JJ, Lu CC, Yen GC. Epigallocatechin gallate inhibits urate crystals-induced peritoneal inflammation in C57BL/6 mice. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2016;60(10):2297–303.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhong X, Liu M, Yao W, Du K, He M, Jin X, Jiao L, Ma G, Wei B, Wei M. Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate attenuates microglial inflammation and neurotoxicity by suppressing the activation of canonical and noncanonical inflammasome via TLR4/NF-kappaB pathway. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2019;63(21): e1801230.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhao M, Xia T, Xing JQ, Yin LH, Li XW, Pan J, Liu JY, Sun LM, Wang M, Li T, et al. The stress granule protein G3BP1 promotes pre-condensation of cGAS to allow rapid responses to DNA. EMBO Rep. 2022;23(1): e53166.

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang P, Mathieu C, Kolaitis RM, Zhang P, Messing J, Yurtsever U, Yang Z, Wu J, Li Y, Pan Q, et al. G3BP1 is a tunable switch that triggers phase separation to assemble stress granules. Cell. 2020;181(2):325-345.e328.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Jayabalan AK, Adivarahan S, Koppula A, Abraham R, Batish M, Zenklusen D, et al. Stress granule formation, disassembly, and composition are regulated by alphavirus ADP-ribosylhydrolase activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021719118.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Guillen-Boixet J, Kopach A, Holehouse AS, Wittmann S, Jahnel M, Schlussler R, Kim K, Trussina I, Wang J, Mateju D, et al. RNA-Induced conformational switching and clustering of G3BP drive stress granule assembly by condensation. Cell. 2020;181(2):346–361.e317.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Wahab A, Gao K, Jia C, Zhang F, Tian G, Murtaza G, Chen J. Significance of resveratrol in clinical management of chronic diseases. Molecules. 2017;22(8):1329.

    PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Drs. Tao Li, Hong Cai from National Center of Biomedical Analysis for providing antibody and reagents.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from China National Natural Science Foundation (No. 82171037) and Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of special funding support (XMLX202133).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jing Li and Feng Zhang contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100730, China

    Jing Li, Yanyun Chen, Jianying Liu, Zhenyu Liu, Ying Xiong & Xiuhua Wan

  2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Sergeant School Affiliated to Army Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China

    Feng Zhang & Wei Bian

Authors
  1. Jing Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Feng Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Bian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yanyun Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jianying Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Zhenyu Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ying Xiong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Xiuhua Wan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

XW and JL (Jing Li) supervised the project; JL (Jing Li), FZ and XW designed the experiments; JL (Jing Li) and FZ performed RPE culture, cell transfection and Western blotting analysis; YC and JL (Jianying Liu) performed IFN expression and production measurement; ZL performed FACS analysis and YX performed the CellTiter assays. XW, JL (Jing Li), FZ and WB analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing Li or Xiuhua Wan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

Consent for publication

All authors have agreed to publish this manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Zhang, F., Bian, W. et al. cGAS inhibition alleviates Alu RNA-induced immune responses and cytotoxicity in retinal pigmented epithelium. Cell Biosci 12, 116 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-022-00854-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-022-00854-y

Keywords

  • RPE
  • AMD
  • GA
  • cGAS
  • Alu RNA
  • EGCG
  • RSVL

Cell & Bioscience

ISSN: 2045-3701

Contact us