- Open Access
Characterization of placental and decidual cell development in early pregnancy loss by single-cell RNA sequencing
Cell & Bioscience volume 12, Article number: 168 (2022)
Early pregnancy loss (EPL) presents as sporadic or recurrent miscarriage during the first trimester. In addition to chromosomal defects, EPL may result from impairment of the placental-decidual interface at early gestational age due to gene-environmental interactions.
To better understand the pathogenesis associated with this impairment, cell development in chorionic villi and decidua of different forms of EPL (sporadic or recurrent) was investigated with single-cell RNA sequencing and compared to that of normal first-trimester tissue.
Unique gene expression signatures were obtained for the different forms of EPL and for normal tissue and the composition of placental and decidual cell clusters in each form was established. In particular, the involvement of macrophages in the EPL phenotypes was identified revealing an immunoactive state.
Differential gene expression and unique marker genes among cell clusters from chorionic villi and decidua of miscarried and normal pregnancies, may lead to identification of biomarker for EPL.
Early pregnancy loss (EPL), which includes sporadic miscarriage or recurrent miscarriage, is the loss of a pregnancy during the first 13 weeks of gestation and accounts for about 10–15% of all clinically recognized pregnancies [1, 2]. Sporadic miscarriage primarily represents failure of abnormal embryo/fetus to progress to viability, with about one-half of cases resulting from chromosomal abnormalities, mainly aneuploidies, of the embryo [3,4,5]. Recurrent miscarriage, the loss of a minimum of two consecutive pregnancies, may be the result of abnormal endometrial and/or placental development that occurs in about 1–3% of EPLs and may involve maternally driven causes [6, 7]. Genetic-environmental interactions, including genetic predisposition , have been determined in more than 100 gene loci in addition to fetal chromosomal aberrations that may identify 29–60% of cases of recurrent miscarriage [6, 8]. Maternal hormones or metabolism, uterine anatomy, infection, occupational and personal habits, thrombophilia, immune disorders, or environmental exposure have also been reported as possible multifactorial backgrounds for EPL. Epigenetic dysregulation in pregnancy may play a role in the decidualized endometrium, acting as a biosensor of embryo quality, which if disrupted, may lead to implantation of embryos destined to miscarry [6, 9].
Many studies have focused on early development and function of the placenta, the maternal fetal interface [10, 11]. Various subtypes of placental cells have been identified [12,13,14] that are derived from the embryonic trophectoderm and extraembryonic mesoderm to compose the placental structure [15, 16]. Three main epithelial trophoblast types, the cytotrophoblast (CTB), syncytiotrophoblast (STB), and extravillous trophoblast (EVT), are characterized in placental tissues delivered at term [13, 17, 18]. The CTBs, also termed villous cytotrophoblasts (VCTs), form a single layer surrounding the villous stromal cell core and serve as the source of the epithelial “stem cells” of the placenta, which differentiate into either STB or EVT. The STB is a multinucleated cell layer continuously renewed by CTB fusion into it that covers the entire surface of the villous tree throughout pregnancy to secrete the hormones necessary for pregnancy maintenance and to form a barrier across which nutrient and gas exchange can take place. The villous core consists of fibroblasts (FBs); Hofbauer (HB) cells, which are placental villous macrophages of fetal origin that are present throughout pregnancy; and capillary networks. The EVTs, characterized by the expression of HLA-G, DIO2, LAIR2, HTRA4, and MFAP5, erupt from the tips of the placental villi, proliferate, and differentiate to form a trophoblast cell column and to invade maternal decidua. The bulk of EVT differentiation occurs during the first trimester, before the onset of maternal arterial blood flow into the intervillous space of the placenta. EVTs anchor the placenta to the uterine wall and remodel maternal spiral arterioles to provide ample blood supply to the growing fetus. A subset of EVTs may be involved in remodeling of maternal spiral arteries and uterine glands [13, 18,19,20,21]. The fetal macrophages (Hofbauer cells) can be detected in the placental villous stroma as early as 3 weeks post-conception and are present throughout pregnancy. They are likely to have a variety of functions including control of villous remodeling and differentiation, hormonal secretion, and trophoblast turnover [22, 23]. Several lines of evidence have led to the postulation that HB cells may play a role in infection during pregnancy, and they are believed to be increased in EPL as results of their divergent roles in immunity and inflammation [23, 24].
During the implantation window, the endometrium becomes poised to transition to a pregnancy state, a process driven by differentiation of stromal cells into decidual cells (DCs). Cells in the decidua include perivascular (PV) cells, stromal (dS) cells, decidual natural killer (dNK) cells, and decidual macrophages (dM) . Two subtypes of PV cells, the PV1 and PV2, were identified to share smooth muscle marker MGP. However, PV1 and PV2 have a higher expression level of MCAM and MMP11, respectively. Three subtypes of dS cells were characterized to express DKK1, through which trophoblast cell differentiation was determined to be downregulated by HoxB7 gene . dS1 cells share the expression of ACTA2 and TAGLN with PVs but lack expression of the classic decidual markers PRL and IGFBP1. Both dS2 and dS3 express IGFBP1, IGFBP2, and IGFBP6 and share markers with decidualized stromal cells . The dS3 subset expresses PRL and CYP11A1 . Recently, the NK cells dNKp and dNK1- dNK4 were documented to accumulate in recurrent miscarriage . In this study, we applied single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to test the hypothesis that differential gene expression profiles may present as cell-specific in different tissues taken from patients with EPL, either sporadic or recurrent, compared to tissue from elective termination of unplanned pregnancies (ET).
Materials and methods
All experiments involving human specimens including placentas were conducted according to the ethical policies and procedures. The research design, along with written informed consent obtained from the participating subjects, of this project was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Foshan Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (FSFY-MEC-2020-030).
EPL and ET
Five individual patients were recruited for each group of A, B, C, and D, for whom demographic information of EPL and ET is summarized in Table 1. Group A comprised early missed sporadic miscarriage without a fetal heartbeat detectable by ultrasound when the patient presented at the prenatal clinic. Group B were missed sporadic miscarriage with a detectable fetal heartbeat when the patient sought to see a doctor in the clinic, but with subsequent loss of the fetal heartbeat. Group C referred to recurrent miscarriage for two or more pregnancies. Group D was the control group of normal pregnancies with elective termination of pregnancy. The entire chorionic villi and gestational sac containing decidua were collected via vacuum aspiration. The tissues were immediately washed and dissected in cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) until no blood clots were visible, followed by soaking and maintenance in cold MACS Tissue Storage Solution (Miltenyi Biotec, Waltham, MA) for tissue transfer to the research laboratory (within two hours). The tissues were digested with a mixture of proteases containing 0.125% trypsin, 0.05% type IV collagenase, and 0.04% DNase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) that were diluted in Dulbecco’s modified eagle medium (DMEM, HyClone, Logan, UT) at 37 °C for an initial 7 min, followed by washing with DMEM three times, and then a second period of digestion of 20 min. Cells were passed through a Falcon 40-μm cell strainer (#352,340, Corning, Oneonta, NY), precipitated by centrifugation at 300g for 5 min after the red blood cells were lysed, resuspended in PBS, and counted with trypan blue . The average cell counts and cell viability (counts × 10,000)/viability %) of the four groups were 33.9/89.8, 52.4/86.6, 73.6/88, and 38.1/83, respectively (Table 1), which met the requirement of scRNA-seq platform with 10 × Genomics technology (www.10xgenomics.com).
scRNA-seq and data process
The Chromium Single Cell 3’ Reagent Kit (10 × Genomics) was applied to scRNA-seq. The procedure was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The library was constructed and sequenced on Illumina PE150 platform with 26 bp (Read1) and 98 bp (Read2) [13, 29]. The raw data were processed by using CellRanger V3.0.2 (https://support.10xGenomics.com/single-cell-expression/software) , followed by using Seurat V3.0 (https://satijalab.org/seurat/) for cell clustering, gene expression, and marker genes, trajectory pseudotime with Monocle (a tool for quantification of expressed mRNA in scRNA-seq data) , gene module with WGCNA (Weighted Gene Co-Expression Network Analysis) , cell cycle with Cyclone, cell–cell interactions with Scanpy V1.4.6, gene interaction with Cytoscape V3.1.0 (http://cytoscape.org), and cell network with String (https://string-db.org/) [33,34,35]. PCA and UMAP (uniform manifold approximation and projection) were applied for data visualization . Gene differential expression, gene ontology functional annotation, and pathways that associated with specific cell cluster were analyzed with DAVID (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/)  and compared to the online database of KEGG (http://www.kegg.jp/kegg) and Gene Orthology (http://geneontology.org), as we described previously .
The ImageJ software (https://imagej.en.softonic.com) was used to calculate relative expressions. Comparison of cell clusters among four groups was analyzed with SPSS 17.0 (http://software.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp). GraphPad Prism Version 7.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) was used for statistical analyses. Data were expressed as mean ± SEM values. Student t test was used for comparison between two groups, and one-way ANOVA was used for comparison between multiple groups. The difference is considered statistically significant when P < 0.05 unless otherwise stated.
Raw and processed data from this study have been submitted to the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/geo) under accession numbers GSE174399.
Differentially expressed cell clusters in the placental tissues of EPL and ET
EPL is a complex condition that results from genetic predisposition, epigenetic mis-regulation, immune reaction to infection and inflammation, endocrine dysfunction and imbalance of hormone, and uterine structural and endometrial abnormalities [39,40,41]. These etiological factors would influence placentation or decidualization at the early stage of pregnancy [42,43,44]. Previously, we performed a transcriptomic study on embryonic placental tissues obtained at termination of pregnancy and documented that long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) played an epigenetic regulated role on infection and inflammation pathways that are associated with pregnancy loss . In the current study, cell clusters were classified into villi-, decidua-, and immune- categories from placental tissues of EPL and ET, based on previously described placental cell clusters [13, 17, 25]. Proportions and subtypes of these cell clusters were determined from embryonic placental tissues that were derived from 20 pregnancies at 6–7 gestational weeks, with five pregnancies in each of four groups A, B, C, or D, respectively (Table 1). These four groups could be distinguished at the molecular level with highly expressed genes, as presented in Fig. 1. A total of 217,649 genes, including 40,705 from group A, 51,506 from B, 43,755 from C, and 75,683 from D, were sequenced.
After groups A, B, C, and D were differentiated with highly expressed markers, which were characterized by principal component analysis (PCA), that specifically associated with the clinically identified phenotypes, placental and decidual cell clusters were identified with previously reported gene markers for each cell cluster [13, 23], followed by characterization of single-cell gene expression profiles. Group D with normal placental tissues that were obtained by elective termination was used as a control, to which tissues of groups A, B, and C were compared. Both groups A and B comprised sporadic miscarriages, yet the period of intrauterine development of placental cells in group B could be longer than in group A, indicating that the sign of intrauterine life lasted longer before pregnancy was terminated, although both groups had a similar gestational age. Indeed, the detailed cell clusters differed from each other among these four groups of pathologic pregnancies (Fig. 2). For example, CTB1, a subtype of very early VCT1, was identified from group D but not in EPL, and VCT2 was seen in group A (as well as group C), but not in group B (nor in group D). These findings suggested the difference in trophoblast differentiation and development. The developmental difference of placenta occurred not only in trophoblasts, but also in DC clusters. PV1, PV2, dS1, and DC2 have been identified in group D only, and plasma cell cluster was not present in either EPL or ET, except in group A (cluster 13 and 16).
Three most abundant cell clusters in EPL
The three most abundant cell clusters in EPL were VCT1, dM1, and HB cell (HB1), which were different from EVT3, VCT1, and epithelial glandular 1 cell (Epi1) in ET (Fig. 3). VCT1 accounted for 16.68%, 15.74%, 12.25%, and 14.54% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively; dM1 accounted for 15.21%, 13.65%, 13.14%, and 4.35% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively; and HB1, for 10.07%, 9.04%, 11.55%, and 4.92% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively, in EPL. However, EVT3 accounted for 6.99%, 8.80%, 5.75%, and 16.23% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively, in ET (Fig. 2b). These data clearly demonstrate that the presence of macrophages, either dM1 or villous HB1, as the major cell cluster in EPL, strongly indicate that immunoreaction has been an etiological factor underlying the pathogenic process of EPL, in either sporadic or recurrent miscarriage (p < 0.001). The finding of VCT1 as the leading cell cluster in both groups A and B, rather than EVT as seen in group D, suggested that the transformation of VCT to EVT in SMs during trophoblast development was delayed (p < 0.005). This hypothesis was also supported by the differences of either the marker genes among groups of EPL and ET or the gene expression profiles in each cell cluster (Additional file 1: Fig. S1).
Unique marker genes in trophoblasts may lead to identification of a biomarker for EPL
Single-cell transcriptomics has been used to describe the diverse trophoblast subtypes from peri-implantation conceptuses through placentas delivered at term [12,13,14, 17, 46, 47]. In this study, the single-cell–based transcriptomic expression of trophoblasts was profiled in EPL and ET, which is presented with RidgePlots (Fig. 3) and DotPlots (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). Among the top-10–expressed marker genes in VCT cell clusters, seven genes (PAGE4, PEG10, SMAGP, VGLL1, ISYNA1, XAGE3, and DUSP9) were present in all EPL and in ET. An additional two genes, PHLDA2 and NGFRAP1, were only present in EPL, not in ET. Three genes, HBB, MORC4, and ADIRF, were found to be specifically expressed in group A, B, and C, respectively. MORC4 was also found in group D, along with two unique genes, GCHFR and PNP (Fig. 3). The top-10 marker genes expressed in STB cluster cells were highly unique and specific to each group. Other than CYP19A1, which was expressed in group A and in group D, all marker genes were unique in each specific EPL group. Documentation of HLA-G as a marker for EVT cells  has been replicated in groups C and D, but not in groups A and B. Several genes showed specific expression in EVT cells of variant EPL: NUTOM was present in EPL, but not in ET; QSOX1 and COL4A1 were in both groups A and B, but not in group C; LAIR2 was present in groups B and C; and PAPPA2 in groups A and C. These unique or specifically expressed marker genes may lead to further investigation for biomarkers and be applied in clinical prediction of EPL.
Unique marker genes in macrophages
Macrophages in the early stage of placentation are composed of fetal macrophages, HBs, and dM1 (Fig. 4). Knowledge about HB cell function in EPL is limited, although HBs are important for a successful pregnancy, including placental morphogenesis, immune regulation, control of stromal water content, and the transfer of ions and serum proteins across the maternal–fetal barrier. Four types of HBs have been reported, grouped on the basis of whether or not these cells had lamellipodia, funnel-like structures, blebs, and microplicae , and their levels were found to be significantly higher in missed abortion cases . Three subtypes of HB were identified in the current study. ApoE was found to be among the top-10–expressed genes in EPL but not in ET. Specifically, ApoC1, along with SPP1, FABP5, FTL, CTSD, CHI3L1, CSTB, CTSB, and LIPA, is only present in the HB1 of A_SM. HB1 is characterized by major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) molecules, the HLA genes; HLA-DRA, HLA-DPB1, and HLA-DQA1 are present in group B, and HLA-DRA, HLA-DPB1, HLA-DRB1, HLA-DPA1, and HLA-DQB1 in group C. For the HB1 cluster of the control group D, the majority of genes expressed were related to red blood cells. Seven hemoglobin subunits (HBA1, HBA2, HBE1, HBG1, BG2, HBM, and HBZ), one hemoglobin-stabilizing protein AHSP, and SCL25A37, which is a mitochondrial iron transporter that specifically mediates iron uptake in developing erythroid cells and plays an essential role in heme biosynthesis, were the most highly expressed genes (Fig. 4). Two newly discovered HB cell clusters, HB2 and HB3, that were not described in the earlier reports of scRNA-seq study [14, 25], were newly identified in groups A and C of the current study. HB2 was present in groups A, B, and C, and HB3 in groups A and C. Variant gene expression in the subtypes of HB cluster appear to have a pathophysiological role in the variant phenotypes of EPL. In the dM1, transcripts CCL2, CCL3, and CCL4, which are macrophage-inflammatory proteins, were present in group D only, whereas CCL20 was in the three groups of EPL but not in group D. CXCL2 was present in groups A, C, and D but not in B. These cytokine-chemokine molecules, along with superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), which was found in the dM1 clusters of groups B and C, supported our recently reported finding that cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction was the common pathway in spontaneous miscarriage .
NK cell clusters in EPL but not in ET
NK-CD16+ cell clusters were identified in groups A and B, and decidual NK2 (dNK2), in group C. No NK cell cluster was present in group D. All groups of EPL expressed genes NKG7, CCL5, GNLY, and GZMB in their NK cell clusters. The gene GZMA, however, was only in the clusters of groups A and B but not in C, which could be used as a good marker to distinguish SM from RM (Fig. 5). In addition, XCL2, the X-C motif chemokine ligand 2, which is a member of the C-chemokine superfamily and functions in inflammatory and immunological responses, inducing leukocyte migration and activation , could be another marker for EPL. Recently, three developmental branches in which dNKp differentiates into dNK1 cells (Path 1) and into two distinct branches of dNK2 and dNK3 cells (Path 2 and Path 3) have been proposed with high-resolution pseudotime prediction . In addition, we applied pseudotime prediction and characterized the NK differential trajectory of these three NK clusters in groups A, B, and C (Fig. 5). The differential trajectory showed a similar pattern for NK-CD16+ cell clusters, although six differential states were predicted through three branching points, and eight differential states were generated from four branching points in groups A and B. Unlike groups A and B, in which the branching points 1 and 2 were relatively close, differentiation of dNK2 in group C had distant branching points between each other, which made it possible to easily distinguish the differential states.
Other cell clusters in EPL
Cell clusters identified in EPL, other than those mentioned above, were FB1 and FB2; Epi 1 and Epi 2; endothelial cells (Endo) of maternal (Endo M), fetal (Endo F), or lymphocyte (Endo L) origin; T cells; plasma cells; monocytes (MO); dendritic cells (DCs); dS1 cells; PV1; and PV2 cells, and at least three unidentified cell clusters (Fig. 2). Among these clusters, PV1, PV2, DC, and T cells were present in group D only, not in EPL; and two plasma cell clusters, as well one of MO, were only found in group A. Although both FB1 and FB2 were present in group D, FB1 was identified in group C, and FB2 in groups A and B. To distinguish FB1 from FB2, Fb1 was characterized by expressing HAPLN1, IGF2, IGFBP3, IL6ST, OLFML3, PHACTR2, PITX2, S100A10, SERPINE2, and TGFBI, but FB2 expresses COL4A1, COL4A2, COL6A3, COX4I2, GATM, LAMA2, NDUFA4L2, NID2, PLA2G2A, and PPP1R14A. HAPLN1 and S100A10 have been documented among the top 60 expressed genes in villous FB1, FB2, and FB3 . COL4A1, COL4A2, COL6A3, and LAMA2 are the molecules involved in focal adhesion and extracellular matrix pathways associated with premature preterm rupture of membrane (PPROM), which is regulated by lncRNA, as we documented earlier . PVs participate in different phases of chorionic villus vascular development and remodeling associated with placental vasculogenesis . In this study, the marker genes APOD, APOE, C1R, CFD, DCN, IGFBP2, IGFBP5, IGFBP7, PTGDS, and SPARCL1 were identified in PV1, and ACTA2, HSPB6, IFITM2, IGFBP2, IGFBP4, MYL9, SELM, TAGLN, TMSB4, XC11 or f96 in PV2. The lack of PV cell clusters in either sporadic or recurrent miscarriage provided evidence of delayed development of vasculogenesis in EPL.
Cell development and pathway activity
Gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA)  was performed for the whole-network connectivity of variably expressed genes among the EPL and ET groups. As shown in Fig. 6a, the WGCNA identified gene modules, each of which may contain a set of genes that are co-expressed at a certain development stage. Pathway enrichment of cell clusters for EPL and ET was assessed with GSVA , the gene set variation analysis (Additional file 1: Fig. S3). The top-20 highly enriched pathways characterized in EPL and ET are presented with DotPlot in Fig. 6b. The enriched pathways associated with biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions are presented in each group of EPL and ET. The highly up-regulated pathways associated with metabolism for VCT cluster are terpenoid backbone biosynthesis in group A, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism in group B, valine-leucine-isoleucine biosynthesis in group C, and primary immunodeficiency in group D; for STB cluster, citrate-cycle-TCA-cycle in group A, N-glycan biosynthesis in group B, one-carbon-pool by folate in group C, and primary immunodeficiency in group D; and for EVT cluster, mammal circadian rhythm in group A, one-carbon-pool by folate in group B, galactose metabolism in group C, and glycosaminoglycan-biosynthesis-keratan-sulfate in group D. In the fetal macrophage HB cluster, one-carbon-pool by folate is the highly enriched pathway in group A, ganglio-series of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis in group B, glycan degradation in group C, and porphyrin-chlorophyll metabolism in group D. In the maternal macrophage dM cluster, the global series of glycosphingolipid biosynthesis is the highly enriched pathway in group A, primary bile acid biosynthesis in group B, taurine and hypotaurine metabolism in group C, and porphyrin-chlorophyll metabolism in group D. Primary immune deficiency is the enriched pathway in groups A and C, and graft versus host disease is in group B for NK clusters.
Characterization of developmental state of placental cell clusters among EPL and ET. Cellular differentiation and development were plotted with an algorithm of diffusion pseudotime . For the branching trace of trophoblasts, generally, STB showed more branching points, which generated more cell states, but VCT showed fewer branching points in all EPL and ET groups. As presented with Heatmap, the Pseudotime state of differentiation of placental trophoblast clusters are presented in Fig. 7. For macrophages, although there was only one branching point in HB of group B, the higher branching points were shown in group C for both fetal HB and maternal dM, in which there were six branching points that generated 12 cellular states in HB, and five branching points generated nine states in dM.
Based on the gene expression profiles in the cell cycle, as presented by the heatmap illustrated in Additional file 1: Fig. S4, the states of cell cycle stages G1, S, and G2M are presented in a column-bar graphic for each cell cluster . Other than cluster4_FB1 and cluster12_CTB1, the majority of clusters showed that the cell state was at G1 in the group D. In EPL, S stage was in the majority of clusters, except G1 stage was almost 100% in cell clusters dS1 of group B and dM1 of group C.
Scanpy was applied to determine cell–cell interactions  (Fig. 8). Cell–cell interaction may be compared in each group of EPL and ET. For example, in group A, VCTs interact with MO1, NK CD16+, VCT2, STB, FB2, and EVT3. The interaction between VCT and EVT was mediated through FB2. VCT does not interact with HB in group A; however, it may interact with HB in group C (Fig. 8a). Demonstration of cell–cell interactions may help in exploring the pathophysiological impact of one type of cell on the other type(s) of cells that associate with the development of EPL, as illustrated in Fig. 8b with circles. This was well documented by the differential expression of the gene SOD2, which has been found to be expressed highly in trophoblast clusters and in macrophages (both HB1 and dM1). However, SOD2 expression was relatively low in DC clusters and in blood cell clusters (Fig. 9).
Two of the most critical steps in the establishment of human pregnancy are decidualization and placentation, which are required for maternal interactions with the developing embryo. It is well known that the majority of cases of EPL are the result of chromosomal abnormality . In addition, transcriptomic profiles revealed that the chemokine-cytokine pathway as well as nerve growth factor receptor and SOD2 may present a common pathogenic mechanism associated with EPL, as seen among stillbirths and spontaneous preterm births that we reported recently . The transcriptomic results were generated from bulk RNA sequencing, whereby molecular changes were quantified by estimating the mean value from millions of cells and averaging the signal of individual cells but ignoring cell-to-cell heterogeneity . Therefore, unraveling of the heterogeneity of cell genotype, phenotype, and function within a given subpopulation of placental cells was necessary for a better understanding of the pathogenesis of EPL. In this study, we investigated cell-specific transcriptomics in tissues from EPL via scRNA-seq, with a focus on villous cells, which associate with early placentation, and DCs that associate with decidualization.
EPL has been grouped into three main categories according to causative factors: 1) resulting primarily from villous maldevelopment (such as in aneuploidy and/or lethal fetal anomalies), 2) resulting mainly from abnormal CTB invasion (such as in the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome), and 3) resulting from the abnormalities at the uteroplacental interface (such as in luteal phase deficiency or chronic inflammatory reaction) . Among these three categories, EPL is increasingly considered a placentation disorder, resulting from placental oxidative stress, which may cause a thinner and fragmented trophoblast shell, reduced cytotrophoblast invasion of the endometrium and incomplete plugging of the lumen at the tips of the spiral arteries, and premature onset of the maternal circulation and loss of periphery-center coordination, with blood flow occurring throughout the placenta. Three types of trophoblasts, VCT, STB and EVT, are differentiated from trophectoderm [60,61,62]. In our earlier study, we discovered that SOD2, the mitochondrial superoxide dismutase isoform, was upregulated, being expressed in both fetal and maternal tissues in sporadic miscarriage, in addition to in stillbirth and in spontaneous preterm birth . In this study, we further investigated differential expression of SOD2 gene in each cell cluster. The increased expression of SOD2 as a compensatory response to increased generation of superoxide (oxidative stress) in the mitochondria, in the EPL groups, compared to the non-pregnancy loss group D, provided further evidence supporting our results obtained from whole placental transcriptomic studies and indicated that placental oxidative stress is a pathogenic factor involved in the pathogenesis of EPL.
Other than decidual macrophages, in which SOD2 was expressed in all four groups, four DC clusters—the dS1, DC2, PV, and dNK2—expressed SOD2 in the group D control group. To our surprise, no SOD2 was expressed in maternal DC clusters (Fig. 9) or in the blood immune cells, in group C. This result suggested that the pathogenic mechanism associated with group C differs from that of SMs. Indeed, NDUFB3, the NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplex 3 that is a subunit of complex 1 of mitochondrial electron transport chain, has been recently found to be significantly increased in DCs from RM cases. It was documented that overexpression of NDUFB3 may inhibit cell vitality and oxidative stress of DCs and decrease mitochondrial membrane potential expression levels . Decidual CD4+T (dCD4+T) cells play pivotal roles in inducing and maintaining maternal–fetal tolerance. Functional alteration of cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) in the decidua also contributes to maintaining pregnancies. Dysfunctional dCD4+T cells are associated with miscarriage. A decreased number and altered function of Eomes+dCD4+T cells were observed in miscarriage. A prevalence of CD4 + T cells producing IL-22 and IL-4 (Th17/Th2/IL-22 + , Th17/Th0/IL-22 + , Th17/Th2/IL-22 + , and Th0/IL-22 + cells) was observed in the decidua of successful pregnancies [45, 64]. In this current study, a T cell cluster was identified in the control group of group D, but no T cell cluster was identified in the EPL groups. Whether and how the T cells that have been pathogenically impacted at an earlier stage that resulted in no T cell cluster can be identified from tissues from miscarriage requires further investigation.
In summary, applying scRNA-seq, we have documented variant cell clusters in different subtypes of EPL. Particularly, we determined the marker genes in trophoblasts and in placental macrophages and their development in the early stage of pregnancy and in EPL. Identification of increased expression of SOD2 in EPL further confirmed that placental oxidative stress is a pathogenic factor throughout the entire period of pregnancy.
The datasets, including the Raw and processed data, supporting the conclusions of this article are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; https://www.ncbi. nlm.nih.gov/geo) under accession numbers GSE174399
Regan L, Rai R. Epidemiology and the medical cause of miscarriage. Bailliere’s Best Pract Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:839–54.
Rai R, Regan L. Recurrent miscarriage. Lancet. 2006;368:601–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69204-0.
Goddijn M, Leschot NJ. Genetic aspects of miscarriage. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2000;14:855–65.
Zhang YX, Zhang YP, Gu Y, Guan FJ, Li SL, Xie JS, Shen Y, Wu BL, Ju W, Jenkins EC, Brown WT, Zhong N. Genetic analysis of first-trimester miscarriages with a combination of cytogenetic karyotyping, microsatellite genotyping and arrayCGH. Clin Genet. 2009;75(2):133–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0004.2008.01131.x.
Choi TY, Lee HM, Park WK, Jeong SY, Moon HS. Spontaneous abortion and recurrent miscarriage: a comparison of cytogenetic diagnosis in 250 cases. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2014;57:518–25.
Larsen EC, Christiansen OB, Kolte AM, Macklon N. New insights into mechanisms behind miscarriage. BMC Med. 2013;11:154. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-11-154.
Garrido-Gimenez C, Alijotas-Reig J. Recurrent miscarriage: causes, evaluation and management. Postgrad Med J. 2015;91:151–62. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132672.
Rull K, Nagirnaja L, Laan M. Genetics of recurrent miscarriage: challenges, current knowledge, future directions. Front Genet. 2012;3:34. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00034.
McNamee K, Dawood F, Farquharson R. Recurrent miscarriage and thrombophilia: an update. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2012;24:229–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0b013e32835585dc.
Cleal JK, Lewis RM. The placenta and developmental origins of health and disease. In: Rosenfeld CS, editor. The Epigenome and developmental origins of health and disease. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2016. p. 439–61.
Turco MY, Moffett A. Development of the human placenta. Development. 2019;146(22):dev163428. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.163428.
Liu Y, Fan X, Wang R, Lu X, Dang YL, Wang H, Lin HY, Zhu C, Ge H, Cross JC, Wang H. Single-cell RNA-seq reveals the diversity of trophoblast subtypes and patterns of differentiation in the human placenta. Cell Res. 2018;28(8):819–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-018-0066-y.
Suryawanshi H, Morozov P, Straus A, Sahasrabudhe N, Max KEA, Garzia A, Kustagi M, Tuschl T, Williams Z. A single-cell survey of the human first-trimester placenta and decidua. Sci Adv. 2018;4(10):eaau4788. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau4788.
Li H, Huang Q, Liu Y, Garmire LX. Single cell transcriptome research in human placenta. Reproduction. 2020;160:R155–67. https://doi.org/10.1530/REP-20-0231.
Norwitz ER, Schust DJ, Fisher SJ. Implantation and the survival of early pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1400–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra000763.
Gude NM, Roberts CT, Kalionis B, King RG. Growth and function of the normal human placenta. Thromb Res. 2004;114:397–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2004.06.038.
Pavličev M, Wagner GP, Chavan AR, Owens K, Maziarz J, Dunn-Fletcher C, Kallapur SG, Muglia L, Jones H. Single-cell transcriptomics of the human placenta: inferring the cell communication network of the maternal-fetal interface. Genome Res. 2017;27(3):349–61. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.207597.116.
Burton GJ, Fowden AL. The placenta: a multifaceted, transient organ. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140066.
Gamage TK, Chamley LW, James JL. Stem cell insights into human trophoblast lineage differentiation. Hum Reprod Update. 2016;23:77–103.
Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36:411–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4096.
Kovats S, Main EK, Librach C, Stubblebine M, Fisher SJ, DeMars R. A class I antigen, HLA-G, expressed in human trophoblasts. Science. 1990;248:220–3. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2326636.
Hoo R, Nakimuli A, Vento-Tormo R. Innate immune mechanisms to protect against infection at the human decidual-placental interface. Front Immunol. 2020;11:2070. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.02070.
Wetzka B, Clark DE, Charnock-Jones DS, Zahradnik HP, Smith SK. Isolation of macrophages (Hofbauer cells) from human term placenta and their prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane production. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:847–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.4.847.
Reyes L, Golos TG. Hofbauer cells: their role in healthy and complicated pregnancy. Front Immunol. 2018;9:2628. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02628.
Vento-Tormo R, Efremova M, Botting RA, Turco MY, Vento-Tormo M, Meyer KB, Park JE, Stephenson E, Polański K, Goncalves A, Gardner L, Holmqvist S, Henriksson J, Zou A, Sharkey AM, Millar B, Innes B, Wood L, Wilbrey-Clark A, Payne RP, Ivarsson MA, Lisgo S, Filby A, Rowitch DH, Bulmer JN, Wright GJ, Stubbington MJT, Haniffa M, Moffett A, Teichmann SA. Single-cell reconstruction of the early maternal-fetal interface in humans. Nature. 2018;563(7731):347–53. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0698-6.
Huang L, Ying H, Chen Z, Zhu YL, Gu Y, Hu L, Chen D, Zhong N. Down-regulation of DKK1 and Wnt1/β-catenin pathway by increased homeobox B7 resulted in cell differentiation suppression of intrauterine fetal growth retardation in human placenta. Placenta. 2019;80:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2019.03.001.
Lucas ES, Vrljicak P, Muter J, Diniz-da-Costa MM, Brighton PJ, Kong CS, Lipecki J, Fishwick KJ, Odendaal J, Ewington LJ, Quenby S, Ott S, Brosens JJ. Recurrent pregnancy loss is associated with a pro-senescent decidual response during the peri-implantation window. Commun Biol. 2020;3(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0763-1.
Wang F, Jia W, Fan M, Shao X, Li Z, Liu Y, Ma Y, Li YX, Li R, Tu Q, Wang YL. Single-cell immune landscape of human recurrent miscarriage. Genom Proteom Bioinform. 2021;19(2):208–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gpb.2020.11.002.
Li G, Tian L, Goodyer W, Kort EJ, Buikema JW, Xu A, Wu JC, Jovinge S, Wu SM. Single cell expression analysis reveals anatomical and cell cycle-dependent transcriptional shifts during heart development. Development. 2019;146(12):dev173476. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.173476.
Wolf FA, Angerer P, Theis FJ. SCANPY: large-scale single-cell gene expression data analysis. Genome Biol. 2018;19(1):15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-017-1382-0.
Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Placental oxidative stress: from miscarriage to preeclampsia. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004;11(6):342–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsgi.2004.03.003.
Lv B, An Q, Zeng Q, Zhang X, Lu P, Wang Y, Zhu X, Ji Y, Fan G, Xue Z. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals regulatory mechanism for trophoblast cell-fate divergence in human peri-implantation conceptuses. PLoS Biol. 2019;17(10): e3000187. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000187.
Jauniaux E, Burton GJ. Pathophysiology of histological changes in early pregnancy loss. Placenta. 2005;26(2–3):114–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2004.05.011.
Hustin J, Jauniaux E, Schaaps JP. Histological study of the materno-embryonic interface in spontaneous abortion. Placenta. 1990;11(6):477–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0143-4004(05)80193-6.
Jauniaux E, Hempstock J, Greenwold N, Burton GJ. Trophoblastic oxidative stress in relation to temporal and regional differences in maternal placental blood flow in normal and abnormal early pregnancies. Am J Pathol. 2003;162(1):115–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63803-5.
Yin XJ, Hong W, Tian FJ, Li XC. Proteomic analysis of decidua in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) reveals mitochondrial oxidative stress dysfunction. Clin Proteomics. 2021;18(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12014-021-09312-2.
Chen L, Li M, Sun F, Qian J, Du M, Wang S, Li D. Eomesodermin regulate decidual CD4+T cell function during human early pregnancy. J Reprod Immunol. 2021;146: 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2021.103290.
Cha J, Sun X, Dey SK. Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy. Nat Med. 2012;18(12):1754–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3012.
Picelli S, Faridani OR, Björklund AK, Winberg G, Sagasser S, Sandberg R. Full-length RNA-seq from single cells using Smart-seq2. Nat Protoc. 2014;9(1):171–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.006.
Zheng GX, Terry JM, Belgrader P, Ryvkin P, Bent ZW, Wilson R, Ziraldo SB, Wheeler TD, McDermott GP, Zhu J, Gregory MT, Shuga J, Montesclaros L, Underwood JG, Masquelier DA, Nishimura SY, Schnall-Levin M, Wyatt PW, Hindson CM, Bharadwaj R, Wong A, Ness KD, Beppu LW, Deeg HJ, McFarland C, Loeb KR, Valente WJ, Ericson NG, Stevens EA, Radich JP, Mikkelsen TS, Hindson BJ, Bielas JH. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun. 2017;16(8):14049. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14049.
Qiu X, Hill A, Packer J, Lin D, Ma YA, Trapnell C. Single-cell mRNA quantification and differential analysis with Census. Nat Methods. 2017;14(3):309–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4150.
Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;29(9):559. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-559.
Butler A, Hoffman P, Smibert P, Papalexi E, Satija R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat Biotechnol. 2018;36(5):411–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4096.
Zheng GX, Terry JM, Belgrader P, Ryvkin P, Bent ZW, Wilson R, Ziraldo SB, Wheeler TD, McDermott GP, Zhu J, Gregory MT, Shuga J, Montesclaros L, Underwood JG, Masquelier DA, Nishimura SY, Schnall-Levin M, Wyatt PW, Hindson CM, Bharadwaj R, Wong A, Ness KD, Beppu LW, Deeg HJ, McFarland C, Loeb KR, Valente WJ, Ericson NG, Stevens EA, Radich JP, Mikkelsen TS, Hindson BJ, Bielas JH. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14049. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14049.
Hänzelmann S, Castelo R, Guinney J. GSVA: gene set variation analysis for microarray and RNA-seq data. BMC Bioinformatics. 2013;14:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-7.
Pont F, Tosolini M, Fournié JJ. Single-Cell Signature Explorer for comprehensive visualization of single cell signatures across scRNA-seq datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(21): e133. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkz601.
Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:44–57.
Luo X, Shi Q, Gu Y, Pan J, Hua M, Liu M, Dong Z, Zhang M, Wang L, Gu Y, Zhong J, Zhao X, Jenkins EC, Brown WT, Zhong N. LncRNA pathway involved in premature preterm rupture of membrane (PPROM): an epigenomic approach to study the pathogenesis of reproductive disorders. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11): e79897. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079897.
Pei CZ, Kim YJ, Baek KH. Pathogenetic factors involved in recurrent pregnancy loss from multiple aspects. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2019;62(4):212–23. https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2019.62.4.212.
Aghajanova L, Hamilton AE, Giudice LC. Uterine receptivity to human embryonic implantation: histology, biomarkers, and transcriptomics. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2008;19(2):204–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2007.10.008.
Kaur R, Gupta K. Endocrine dysfunction and recurrent spontaneous abortion: an overview. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016;6(2):79–83. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.179024.
Sundheimer LW, Pisarska MD. Abnormal placentation associated with infertility as a marker of overall health. Semin Reprod Med. 2017;35(3):205–16. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0037-1603570.
Brosens I, Pijnenborg R, Vercruysse L, Romero R. The, “Great Obstetrical Syndromes” are associated with disorders of deep placentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(3):193–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.009.
Wang H, Cao Q, Ge J, Liu C, Ma Y, Meng Y, Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu R, Li C, Wang Y, Zhong J, Ju W, Jenkins EC, Brown WT, Zhong N. LncRNA-regulated infection and inflammation pathways associated with pregnancy loss: genome wide differential expression of lncRNAs in early spontaneous abortion. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2014;72(4):359–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12275.
Huang J, Li Q, Peng Q, Xie Y, Wang W, Pei C, Zhao Y, Liu R, Huang L, Li T, Xie L, Zhang J, Dai L, Chen J, Sun J, Zhang W. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals heterogeneity and differential expression of decidual tissues during the peripartum period. Cell Prolif. 2021;54(2): e12967. https://doi.org/10.1111/cpr.12967.
Tilburgs T, Crespo ÂC, van der Zwan A, Rybalov B, Raj T, Stranger B, Gardner L, Moffett A, Strominger JL. Human HLA-G+ extravillous trophoblasts: Immune-activating cells that interact with decidual leukocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112:7219–24. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1507977112.
Reyes L, Wolfe B, Golos T. Hofbauer cells: placental macrophages of fetal origin. Results Probl Cell Differ. 2017;62:45–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54090-0_3.
Karakaya YA, Ozer E. The role of Hofbauer cells on the pathogenesis of early pregnancy loss. Placenta. 2013;34:1211–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2013.10.010.
Wang P, Pan J, Tian X, Dong X, Ju W, Wang Y, Zhong N. Transcriptomics-determined chemokine-cytokine pathway presents a common pathogenic mechanism in pregnancy loss and spontaneous preterm birth. Am J Reprod Immunol. 2021;86(1): e13398. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.13398.
Gibson DA, Greaves E, Critchley HO, Saunders PT. Estrogen-dependent regulation of human uterine natural killer cells promotes vascular remodeling via secretion of CCL2. Hum Reprod. 2015;30:1290–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev067.
Guo C, Cai P, Jin L, Sha Q, Yu Q, Zhang W, Jiang C, Liu Q, Zong D, Li K, Fang J, Lu F, Wang Y, Li D, Lin J, Li L, Zeng Z, Tong X, Wei H, Qu K. Single-cell profiling of the human decidual immune microenvironment in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss. Cell Discov. 2021;7(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41421-020-00236-z.
Wang Y, Zhao S. Cell types of the placenta. In: Vascular Biology of the Placenta, Morgan & Claypool Life Sciences, San Rafael (CA). 2010. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53245
Langfelder P, Horvath S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:559. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-559.
Haghverdi L, Büttner M, Wolf FA, Buettner F, Theis FJ. Diffusion pseudotime robustly reconstructs lineage branching. Nat Methods. 2016;13:845–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3971.
This project was supported in part by the Foshan Medicine Dengfeng Project (2019–2021), the New York State Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene (914-3280, 914-3257), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NICHD 1R01HD094381). We would like to thank faculty members of the Foshan Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital and the New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities who have supported this project. We would also like to thank Guangzhou Huaying Health (www.huayinlab.com) for technical support and Ms. Maureen Marlow for editorial assistance in preparation of the manuscript. We would like to thank faculty members of the Foshan Maternity 95 and Child Healthcare Hospital and the New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities who have supported this project. We would also like to thank Guangzhou Huaying Health (www.huayinlab.com) for technical support and Ms. Maureen Marlow for editorial assistance in preparation of the manuscript.
This project was supported in part by the Foshan Medicine Dengfeng Project (2019–2021), the New York State Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene (914-3280, 914-3257), and the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NICHD 1R01HD094381).
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The research design, along with written informed consent obtained from the participating subjects, of this project was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of Foshan Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital (FSFY-MEC-2020–030).
Consent for publication
All authors have reviewed and approved the submission and publication of this article.
The authors have declared no conflict of interest.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Figure S1. Heatmap of marker genes in cell clusters of early pregnancy loss. Heatmap of marker genes in cell clusters of different groups of early pregnancy loss. The numbers of clusters in groups A, B, C, and D were 16, 15, 16, and 18, respectively. Figure S2. Dot plot of top-10 marker genes (X axis) in trophoblast cell clusters VCT1 (upper), STB1 (middle), and EVT3 (lower), respectively, among early groups A_SM, B_SM, C_RM, and D_ET. Figure S3. Gene set variation analysis (GSVA) analysis. Figure S4. Cell cycle
About this article
Cite this article
Zheng, Y., Pan, J., Xia, C. et al. Characterization of placental and decidual cell development in early pregnancy loss by single-cell RNA sequencing. Cell Biosci 12, 168 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-022-00904-5
- Single-cell RNA sequencing
- First trimester