Skip to main content
Download PDF

Offspring production of haploid spermatid-like cells derived from mouse female germline stem cells with chromatin condensation

Cell & Bioscience volume 12, Article number: 5 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

During male meiosis, the Y chromosome can form perfect pairing with the X chromosome. However, it is unclear whether mammalian Female germline stem cells (FGSCs) without a Y chromosome can transdifferentiate into functional haploid spermatid-like cells (SLCs).

Results

We found that spermatogenesis was restarted by transplanting FGSCs into Kitw/wv mutant testes. Complete meiosis and formation of SLCs was induced in vitro by testicular cells of Kitw/wv mutant mice, cytokines and retinoic acid. Healthy offspring were produced by sperm and SLCs derived from the in vivo and in vitro transdifferentiation of FGSCs, respectively. Furthermore, high-throughput chromosome conformation capture sequencing(Hi-C-seq) and “bivalent” (H3K4me3-H3K27me3) micro chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (μChIP-seq) experiments showed that stimulated by retinoic acid gene 8 (STRA8)/protamine 1 (PRM1)-positive transdifferentiated germ cells (tGCs) and male germ cells (mGCs) display similar chromatin dynamics and chromatin condensation during in vitro spermatogenesis.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that sperm can be produced from FGSCs without a Y chromosome. This suggests a strategy for dairy cattle breeding to produce only female offspring with a high-quality genetic background.

Introduction

Spermatogenesis depends on the stem cell niche and microenvironment created by testicular somatic cells and cytokines. These cells and cytokines promote the self-renewal of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs), male meiosis, and spermiogenesis through cell signal transduction. For example, SSCs injected into Kit mutant sterile mice can develop into spermatozoa [1, 2]; SSCs co-cultured in vitro with testicular somatic cells, melatonin, and cytokines can develop into functional spermatozoa [3].

Many studies have shown that the microenvironment and epigenetics are closely related and that they interact with each other. Feil et al. suggested that the microenvironment can influence gene expression and regulate cell fate through epigenetic changes [4]. Changes in gene expression induced by the microenvironment are often accompanied by epigenetic changes, such as DNA methylation and histone modification, which enable cells to respond rapidly to environmental changes [5]. For example, the metabolic cycle is closely linked to epigenetic changes in the tumor microenvironment. Enzymes that regulate epigenetics can promote DNA transcription and post-translational modifications, thereby affecting the expression of metabolism-related genes [6]. Changes in epigenetic status can also affect the secretion of various hormones and cytokines, which alter the microenvironment, eventually affecting cell fate such as proliferation, survival, and differentiation [4].

In the process of spermatogenesis, epigenetic characteristics change substantially [7]. Mammalian germ cells undergo several key transformations during gametogenesis involving tightly regulated chromatin remodeling, which resets the balanced chromatin structure [8]. In particular, topologically associating domains (TADs) undergo dissolution and reconstruction during spermatogenesis [8, 9]. Interestingly, in humans and mice, mature germ cell nuclear bodies (usually with H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications) are found at promoters of hundreds of genes that are important for spermatogenesis [7]. H3K4me3 (related to gene activation) and H3K27me3 (related to gene silencing) are “bivalent” and most bivalent promoters are hypomethylated in embryonic stem cells and sperm. Recently, bivalent nucleosomes have been localized in mouse spermatocytes and spermatids [10, 11]. However, during in vitro spermatogenesis, the variation of three-dimensional chromosome structures and bivalent histone modifications has not yet been tested.

During male meiosis, the Y chromosome can form perfect pairing with the X chromosome. Evolution has shortened the Y chromosome, so that it is now only one-third of the length of the X chromosome, and contains fewer than 50 genes [12]. If this trend continues, the Y chromosome may disappear altogether. Is it possible to produce new male individuals without a Y chromosome? In fact, the Y chromosome has been lost by a few mammalian species over the course of evolution [13, 14]. The X chromosome of most clinical XX males contains the sex-determining region of the Y chromosome (SRY), which may have resulted from chromosome translocation [15]. SRY on the Y chromosome upregulates the expression of SRY-box transcription factor 9 (SOX9) to determine sex [16]. Transfer of Eif2s3y and Sry, two Y chromosome genes, into XX female mouse embryos was reported to produce males [17]. Knockout of a small segment of enh13, a distal enhancer of Sox9, causes sex reversal [18]. Sox9 is expressed in testicular Sertoli cells but is barely expressed in other testis cells. Sertoli cells in vivo maintain the ability to transdifferentiate into their opposite-sex counterparts [19]. A small number of clinical XX males do not have the SRY gene on the X chromosome but carry mutations in genes that affect the transition of granulosa cells into Sertoli cells, such as Wilms tumor 1 [15, 20]. An interesting question is whether female germline stem cells (FGSCs) with an XX karyotype can undergo male meiosis in the testicular microenvironment to produce functional sperm.

Here, we found that FGSCs isolated from mouse ovaries can develop into functional sperm through epigenetic changes regulated by the testicular microenvironment. These results indicate that, in mice, FGSCs without a Y chromosome can complete male meiosis and develop into functional sperm under the influence of the testicular microenvironment created by testicular somatic cells, retinoic acid (RA), and cytokines. This helps address the key question of whether sperm can be produced from FGSCs that do not possess a Y chromosome, and indicates a strategy for dairy cattle breeding to produce only female offspring with a high-quality genetic background.

Results

In vivo spermatogenesis from FGSCs

To observe whether FGSCs in a testis microenvironment can transdifferentiate into early-stage male germ cells, we injected GFP-labeled FGSCs into testis seminiferous tubules and cultured these tubules in vitro [21]. After culture for 2–15 days, the seminiferous tubules were dissected and observed by fluorescence microscopy. Immunofluorescence analysis showed that the injected GFP-positive cells were located in tubules and that the relative number of GFP-positive cells per tubule increased with continuing culture (Additional file 1: Figure S3A and S4A). We then characterized promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) (an SSC marker [22]) and GFP by dual immunofluorescence analysis, and we observed GFP-PLZF double-positive cells distributed throughout the tubules. The relative number of GFP-PLZF double-positive cells per tubule also increased as the testis culture continued (Additional file 1: Figure S3B and S4B). These results indicated that FGSCs in seminiferous tubules can transdifferentiate into SSCs or early-stage male germ cells.

To investigate whether FGSCs can transdifferentiate into functional sperm or restart spermatogenesis in a recipient testis in vivo, the GFP-labeled FGSCs were transplanted into the seminiferous tubules of recipient Kitw/wv mutant mice (6–8 weeks old) which are sterile because of germ cell deficiency. 6 to 8 weeks after FGSC transplantation, sperm were found in some recipient seminiferous tubules (sperm indicated by arrows; Fig. 1A). To observe sperm morphology, we removed sperm from the epididymal tail (Fig. 1B). Moreover, the occurrence of meiosis in recipient seminiferous tubules was confirmed by the immunofluorescent detection of mouse vasa homologue (MVH) -positive germ cells (Fig. 1C), synaptonemal complex protein 3 (SCP3, a component of the synaptonemal complex [23])-positive spermatocytes (Fig. 1D), and acrosin (ACR)-positive sperm (Fig. 1E). In Kit mutant testes, however, spermatogenesis was arrested and no differentiating germ cells were found, in contrast to the findings in wild-type testes (Fig. 1A and C–E). These results collectively indicate that transplanted FGSCs can transdifferentiate into sperm in recipient Kitw/wv testis by restarting spermatogenesis in recipient seminiferous tubules.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Investigation of spermatogenesis after transplantation of FGSCs into Kitw/wv mouse seminiferous tubules. A The recipients were analyzed by H&E staining at 6–8 weeks after transplantation. B Sperm were isolated from the epididymal tail of recipient mice at 6–8 weeks after transplantation. C Spermatogenesis was analyzed by MVH immunofluorescence 6–8 weeks after transplantation. D Meiosis was confirmed by SCP3 immunofluorescence 6–8 weeks after transplantation. E Sperm were produced and confirmed by ACR immunofluorescence 6–8 weeks after transplantation. Scale bar, 50 µm. WT: wild type

Full size image

Offspring production of sperm derived from transplanted FGSCs

To confirm the full functionality of sperm derived from the in vivo transdifferentiation of FGSCs, Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed. ICSI-administered sperm were able to activate oocytes, and zygotes developed to two-cell and four-cell embryos and blastocysts in culture in KSOMAA medium (Fig. 2A–E). After the transfer of FGSC-derived two-cell embryos to the oviduct, we obtained three full-term pups that were transgenic for actin-GFP. Strong green fluorescence signals were detected in the offspring by live imaging under a Lumazone imaging system (MagBiosystems) (Fig. 2F). Moreover, Southern blot analysis confirmed the GFP transgenic nature of the offspring (Fig. 2G). There were no marked fluctuations in the methylation status [differentially methylated regions (DMRs) of paternally expressed gene 10 (Peg10) and H19] between parent and offspring, as revealed by bisulfite sequencing analysis (Fig. 2H).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Full functionality of sperm in vivo-derived from FGSCs was assessed by ICSI. Zygotes (A), two-cell embryos (B), four-cell embryos (C), and GFP signals in blastocysts (D, E) were observed in in vitro culture (KSOMAA medium) after ICSI with sperm isolated from the epididymal tail of recipient mice. F Strong green fluorescence signals in the offspring detected by live imaging under a Lumazone imaging system (MagBiosystems). TG: transgenic mice; WT: wild type. G GFP sequence in the offspring detected by Southern blot analysis. TG: transgenic mice; WT: wild type. H The methylation status of the DMRs of Peg10 and H19 genes in the mother (F0) and offspring (F1), as shown by bisulfite sequencing analysis. Scale bar, 50 µm

Full size image

Induction of spermatogenesis from FGSCs to haploid spermatid-like cells in vitro

On the basis of the above results, we investigated whether FGSCs have the potential to transdifferentiate into SLCs in vitro. FGSCs isolated from actin-GFP mice were cultured for eight passages, mixed with Kitw/wv testicular cells, and co-cultured for 6 days in MEMα supplemented with KSR, activin A, BMPs-2/4/7, and RA (Fig. 3A). On day 7 of co-culture, we withdrew the culture supernatant fluid and exposed the FGSC-derived cultures to combinations of MEMα, KSR, FSH, BPE, and T (Fig. 3A). To observe the progression of meiosis induced in vitro, we assessed chromosomal synapsis by immunofluorescence of synaptonemal complex protein 1 (SCP1) and SCP3 in the transdifferentiated cells. Characteristic appearances of different meiotic stages (leptotene, zygotene, pachytene, and diplotene) were observed, as shown in Fig. 3B. These results indicated that synapsis had occurred in the transdifferentiated cells. Consistent with this, we found that transcripts of meiotic factors were upregulated in a programmed manner, similar to one cycle of meiotic division in vivo. Transcripts of Stra8, a marker of meiotic initiation, were first detectable on day 3, upregulated to the highest levels on day 6, and then decreased by day 14 (Fig. 3C). Transcripts of Scp3 were first detectable on day 6, upregulated to the highest levels on day 10, and then decreased sharply on day 14, consistent with progression to the diplotene stage. Transcripts of haploid spermatid markers, such as Prm1, Tnp1, Haprin, and Acr, were first detectable on day 8 and were upregulated to the highest levels on day 14 (Fig. 3C). To analyze whether haploid cells were produced, the DNA content of SLCs derived from FGSCs (fSLCs) was determined by Fluorescence Activating Cell Sorter (FACS) analysis. As shown in Fig. 3D, a haploid population of fSLCs was produced corresponding to haploid peaks of positive (mouse sperm) and negative (STO cells, FGSCs, and Sertoli cells) controls. Induced by testicular cells of Kit mutant mice and in basic medium plus morphogens, approximately 3.3% of FGSCs underwent complete meiosis and were transdifferentiated into haploid cells (Fig. 3D). Furthermore, karyotype analysis confirmed the existence of haploid cells from in vitro transdifferentiation (Fig. 3E) and the fSLCs exhibited ACR localization (Fig. 3F). These results indicated that FGSCs can be induced by testicular cells, RA, and cytokines to transdifferentiate into SLCs in vitro.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Induction of meiosis and formation of haploid SLCs during in vitro transdifferentiation of FGSCs. A FGSCs isolated from actin-GFP mouse ovaries were induced by Kitw/wv testicular cells, RA, and cytokines. This process was observed at different time points. B Chromosomal synapsis and different stages of meiosis (leptotene, zygotene, pachytene, diplotene) were assessed by immunofluorescence of SCP1 and SCP3. C Transcripts of meiotic factors and haploid spermatid markers were detected by RT-PCR at different time points. D The DNA content of fSLCs was determined by flow cytometry analysis. The rate of FGSCs underwent complete meiosis was the number of fSLCs at Day 14 divided by the number of FGSCs at Day 0 and then divided by 2. E Haploid cells were confirmed by karyotype analysis. F fSLCs were confirmed by ACR immunofluorescence. Scale bar, 50 µm

Full size image

Offspring production of spermatid-like cells in vitro-derived from FGSCs

We next performed ICSI with FACS-sorted in vitro-derived fSLCs (Fig. 4A–C). By ICSI, fSLCs were able to activate oocytes, and zygotes developed to two-cell embryo, four-cell embryo, and blastocyst stages in culture with KSOMAA medium (Fig. 4D–H). Of 50 oocytes injected with FGSC-derived SLCs, 17 developed to the two-cell stage after activation and five GFP-transgenic blastocysts were obtained after culture in KSOMAA medium. Of 65 oocytes injected with FGSC-derived SLCs, 23 developed to the two-cell stage after activation and two GFP-transgenic pups were obtained after two-cell embryo transfer. Strong green fluorescence signals in the offspring were detected by live imaging under a Lumazone imaging system (MagBiosystems) (Fig. 4I). Moreover, Southern blot analysis showed a GFP sequence in the offspring, but not in the control mice (Fig. 4J). There were no marked fluctuations in the methylation status (DMRs of Peg10 and H19) between parent and offspring, as revealed by bisulfite sequencing analysis (Fig. 4K).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Production of healthy fertile offspring with in vitro-derived fSLCs. A–C The process of ICSI with fSLCs. Zygotes (D), two-cell embryos (E), four-cell embryos (F), and GFP signals in blastocysts (G, H) were observed in in vitro culture (KSOMAA medium) after ICSI with fSLCs derived from in vitro transdifferentiation. I Fluorescence was detected by live imaging under a Lumazone imaging system (MagBiosystems) and strong green fluorescence signals in offspring were shown. TG: transgenic mice; WT: wild type. J GFP sequence in the offspring detected by Southern blot analysis. TG: transgenic mice; WT: wild type. K The methylation status of the DMRs of Peg10 and H19 genes in the mother (F0) and offspring (F1), as shown by bisulfite sequencing analysis. Scale bar, 50 µm

Full size image

Comparison of chromatin dynamics between FGSCs and SSCs during in vitro spermatogenesis

To compare key stages during the in vitro transdifferentiation of FGSCs with those of SSCs, we used FGSC/SSC lines expressing EGFP or EBFP controlled by the cell-specific Stra8 [24] or the Prm1 promoter [25, 26], respectively. Only in MEMα supplemented with KSR, activin A, BMPs-2/4/7, and RA did Stra8-EGFP-expressing female germ cells (STRA8-tGCs) become apparent within 3 days of exposure (Additional file 1: Figure S6A), but Stra8-EGFP-expressing male germ cells (STRA8-mGCs) became apparent within 1 day (Additional file 1: Figure S6A). In the presence of MEMα containing KSR/FSH/T/BPE, post-meiotic Prm1-EBFP-expressing female germ cells (PRM1-tGCs) produced strong reporter expression on day 14 (Additional file 1: Figure S6B), but Prm1-EBFP-expressing male germ cells (PRM1-mGCs) became apparent on day 12 (Additional file 1: Figure S6B). The in vitro differentiation process of mouse SSCs is shown in Additional file 1: Figure S5. During this process, we analyzed the expression of germ-cell-specific markers by RT-PCR and immunofluorescence.

To reveal changes of chromosome conformation and to better understand the dynamics of epigenetic regulation during in vitro transdifferentiation, we performed Hi-C-seq and ChIP-seq for the H3K27me3 mark (which is associated with facultatively repressed promoters) and the H3K4me3 mark (which is associated with active promoters) [27] on germ cells at each stage (STRA8-mGCs, PRM1-mGCs, STRA8-tGCs, and PRM1-tGCs). Germ cells at each stage were sorted by flow cytometry, based on being positive for EGFP or EBFP. Original Hi-C-seq or H3K27me3 and H3K4me3 data for SSCs and FGSCs were obtained from previously published articles [28,29,30].

For each stage, we sequenced 8.0–9.0 billion Hi-C reads, resulting in 73–386 million pairwise chromatin contacts (Additional file 1: Table S2). The comparison between biological replicates resulted in highly reproducible Hi-C maps (Additional file 1: Figure S7A). As shown in Fig. 5, genome organization changed during in vitro spermatogenesis and transdifferentiation. At the initiation of meiosis (STRA8-SSCs or STRA8-FGSCs), there was little difference in the status of compartments and the numbers of TADs of the two cell lines were similarly decreased, compared with those of undifferentiated SSCs or FGSCs, respectively (Fig. 5B). The pattern of the A/B compartment signal dramatically changed in both PRM1-mGCs and PRM1-tGCs and the signals of both were weaker than in the previous two stages (Fig. 5B). The numbers of TADs in both PRM1-mGCs and PRM1-tGCs were decreased compared with those at the previous two stages (totals of 776 and 769 TADs in PRM1-mGCs and PRM1-tGCs genomes, respectively) (Fig. 5C and D). Additionally, correlation analysis of Hi-C interactions between each replicate also showed that chromatin dynamics was similar between FGSCs and SSCs throughout in vitro spermatogenesis (Fig. 5E).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Overall chromosome structure in different cell states. A Heatmap showing normalized Hi-C interaction contacts of chromosome 6 in different cell states. B, C A/B compartment-indicated principal component 1 value and normalized Hi-C interaction contacts displayed at 20 kb resolution. D Numbers of TADs in different cell states. E The correlation of Hi-C interactions between replicates

Full size image

Epigenetic modifications are highly dynamic and change extensively during in vivo spermatogenesis [7, 11]. However, genome-wide histone modifications during in vitro spermatogenesis remain unclear. To compare genome-wide histone modifications between FGSCs and SSCs during in vitro spermatogenesis, we mapped H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications from undifferentiated SSCs and FGSCs to post-meiosis (SSCs, STRA8-mGCs, PRM1-mGCs, FGSCs, STRA8-tGCs, and PRM1-tGCs). Comparisons between biological replicates resulted in highly reproducible ChIP-seq data (Additional file 1: Figure S7B). To analyze the chromatin state throughout the transdifferentiation of FGSCs into male haploid cells and in the in vitro spermatogenesis of SSCs, we performed ChromHMM analysis. All regions of the genome were classified based on the profiles of two histone modifications: H3K4me3-only and H3K27me3-only regions. In this process, the global number of H3K4me3-only regions in both STRA8-mGCs and STRA8-tGCs dramatically decreased compared with that at the undifferentiated stage (SSC and FGSC, respectively) (Fig. 6A). However, the global number of H3K4me3-only regions in both PRM1-mGCs and PRM1-tGCs increased compared with that at the early meiosis-initiated or undifferentiated stage (Fig. 6A). Similarly, in both the transdifferentiation of FGSCs into male haploid cells and the in vitro spermatogenesis of SSCs, the number of H3K27me3-only regions tended to decrease first and then to increase with development (Fig. 6A). We also found a continuous decrease of H3K27me3 on the X chromosome from undifferentiated SSCs or FGSCs to the post-meiosis stage (PRM1-mGCs or PRM1-tGCs) (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, transcriptional start sites (TSSs) of the zinc finger and BTB domain containing 16 (Zbtb16) gene in SSCs but not in FGSCs were marked with H3K4me3, which is consistent with PLZF expression in SSCs but not in FGSCs (Fig. 6C). However, the TSSs of Zbtb16 in both STRA8-tGCs and STRA8-mGCs were marked with a weaker H3K4me3 signal than in SSCs (Fig. 6C). The TSSs of Zbtb16 in both PRM1-tGCs and PRM1-mGCs were marked with a weak H3K4me3 signal (Fig. 6C). The promoter of Stra8 (1.4 kb) in both STRA8-tGCs and STRA8-mGCs had a clear H3K4me3 signal compared with the findings in the other two stages of respective cells (Fig. 6C). The promoter or TSSs of Acr in both PRM1-tGCs and PRM1-mGCs had a strong H3K4me3 signal compared with the findings in the other two stages of respective cells (Fig. 6C). These results indicated that H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 modifications robustly separate the three stages of FGSC transdifferentiation into male haploid cells or in vitro SSC spermatogenesis.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Histone modification of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in different cell states. A Different cell states had global dynamics of H3K27me3-only and H3K4me3-only regions, which defined ChromHMM categories in 200 bp bin. B The H3K27me3 histone modification dynamics were ploted with solid line and chromosome X dynamics were plotted dashed line. C A snapshot of the IGV genome browser showing the reads of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 for Plzf, Stra8, and Acr in different cell states

Full size image

To examine genome-wide chromatin states across developmental time points, we treated all six conditions (two cell lines and three developmental stages) as equivalent, and used k-means clustering to group all genes according to the similarity of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 profiles near their TSSs (Additional file 1: Figure S8A). Clusters 1 and 2 were significantly enriched for functional categories corresponding to DNA repair (Additional file 1: Figure S8B); cluster 3 was significantly enriched for functional categories corresponding to meiosis, synapsis, and spermiogenesis (Additional file 1: Figure S8B). These results indicated that FGSCs and SSCs underwent meiosis and spermiogenesis, induced by testicular somatic cells, RA, and cytokines.

Interestingly, when k-means clustering analysis and Hi-C-seq data were combined, the number of B compartments in all clusters increased and the number of A compartments in all clusters decreased with development (for both SSCs and FGSCs) (Additional file 1: Figure S9A). The number of genes inside TADs of all clusters increased and the number of genes outside TADs of all clusters decreased with development (for both SSCs and FGSCs) (Additional file 1: Figure S9B). An increase in the number of B compartments causes an increase in the heterochromatin ratio, and an increase in the number of genes in TADs is associated with a decrease in the number of enhancers and a decrease in gene expression. Taken together, these results indicate that, as meiosis progresses in vitro spermatogenesis, chromosomes gradually condense, leading to the silencing of many genes.

Methylation and expression analysis of imprinted genes in sperm-like cells derived from FGSCs in vitro

To evaluate the epigenetic status of SLCs transdifferentiated from FGSCs in vitro, DMRs of a maternally imprinted region (Igf2r) and a paternally imprinted region (H19) were examined using bisulfite sequencing analysis. The maternally imprinted Igf2r DMR showed complete methylation but there was no methylation of the paternally imprinted H19 DMR in FGSCs (Additional file 1: Figure S10A). As expected, the major Igf2r and H19 DMR sites in fSLCs were demethylated and methylated, respectively, although a few Igf2r DMR and H19 DMR sites were still methylated and unmethylated, respectively. The methylation status of fSLCs was similar to that of sperm (Additional file 1: Figure S10A), which were unmethylated in the Igf2r DMR and methylated in the H19 DMR. Furthermore, the expression of maternally (Dlk1, Plagl1, and Snrpn) and paternally (H19, Gtl2, and Grb10) imprinted genes was detected. Our analysis revealed that maternally imprinted gene expression increased and paternally imprinted gene expression decreased during the culture period (Additional file 1: Figure S10B–C). These observations indicated that epigenetic transition of imprinted gene methylation and expression was associated with fSLCs transdifferentiated from FGSCs.

Discussion

FGSCs can self-renew and differentiate into functional oocytes [31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]. Here, after the injection of FGSCs into the testes of Kit mutant mice, fertile sperm were produced in the epididymal tail of recipient mice at six to eight weeks after FGSCs transplantation (Additional file 2: Graphic abstract). Induced by Kit mutant testis cells, RA, and cytokines, FGSCs can also undergo complete meiosis to produce SLCs at day 14, and healthy offspring can be produced after ICSI (Additional file 2: Graphic abstract). Furthermore, to obtain a better understanding of how chromatin regulates the process of SSC differentiation and FGSC transdifferentiation in vitro, we investigated changes in chromatin structure (by Hi-C-seq) or histone modification (H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 by ChIP-seq) in the meiosis initiation stage (STRA8+) and the post-meiotic stage (PRM1+) (Additional file 2: Graphic abstract), which were not characterized in previous studies [7, 8, 11]. Hi-C-seq and ChIP-seq analysis showed that FGSCs and SSCs displayed similar chromatin dynamics and chromatin condensation across developmental time points of in vitro spermatogenesis (Additional file 2: Graphic abstract). Bisulfite sequencing analysis showed that the methylation and expression of imprinted genes transitioned during the transdifferentiation of FGSCs into SLCs.

The results of our study indicate that somatic cells of the testis and cytokines provide a microenvironment to change the epigenetic status and the gene expression of FGSCs, induce meiosis, and eventually force their development into male haploid cells. Indeed, germ cell differentiation is controlled by the gonad somatic environment or sexual identity of the gonad proper. Notably, microenvironment signals, including growth factors (paracrine and circulating) and extracellular matrix, as well as cell-to-cell contacts or interactions with Sertoli cells, may play an important role in FGSC transdifferentiation [42]. After the injection of FGSCs into the testis of Kit mutant mice, the injected FGSCs expressed PLZF, a marker of undifferentiated SSCs. We also investigated changes to the chromatin structure (by Hi-C-seq) and histone modification (H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 by ChIP-seq) during SSC differentiation and FGSC transdifferentiation in vitro, both of which had similar epigenetic dynamics. To investigate whether the methylation and expression of imprinted genes changed during the transdifferentiation of FGSCs into SLCs, we examined key imprinted genes, including Dlk1, Plagl1, Snrpn, H19, Gtl2, and Grb10, and showed that the expression of these genes switched following the transdifferentiation of FGSCs into SLCs.

H3K4me3 may play a critical role in spermiogenesis in our in vitro transdifferentiation system. We found that the global number of H3K4me3-only regions in both PRM1-mGCs and PRM1-tGCs increased compared with that in early meiosis-initiated or undifferentiated stages. Moreover, the promoter region or TSSs of Acr in both PRM1-tGCs and PRM1-mGCs was strongly marked with an H3K4me3 signal compared with the findings in the other two stages of the respective cells.

We found that most A/B compartments had disappeared from, and most TADs were dissociated in, PRM1-mGCs and PRM1-tGCs. We did not find that A/B compartments reappeared or that TADs underwent apparent reorganization in PRM1-SSCs and PRM1-FGSCs. However, during in vivo spermatogenesis, the A/B compartments and TADs underwent blurry reappearance after being lost in previous stages and a large reorganization of genome structure occurred in the post-meiosis round sperm stage [8, 9]. There are two possible reasons for this. One is that Prm1-positive cells were probably widely distributed in the zygotene, pachytene, diplotene, and post-meiosis stages [43], which results in a reduced haploid ratio of Prm1-positive cells. Second, we used approximately 10,000 cells to perform Hi-C-seq; this is different from the previous study, in which a large number of cells were used, resulting in the Hi-C-seq data of our study not reaching very high resolution. Therefore, we did not see significant reconstructions of A/B compartments and TADs.

These results indicate that FGSCs underwent spermatogenesis rather than oogenesis. When induced by Kit mutant testis cells, RA, and cytokines, FGSCs can also undergo complete meiosis and characteristic stages of meiosis (leptotene, zygotene, pachytene, diplotene) were observed by SCP3 and SCP1 immunofluorescence. Both spermatogenesis and oogenesis involve meiosis, but they are very different epigenetically. In our study, both STRA8-mGCs and STRA8-tGCs, as well as PRM1-tGCs and PRM1-mGCs, had highly similar A/B compartments, TADs, and histone modification (H3K4me3 and H3K27me3). Haploid cells, which were derived from FGSCs induced by Kit mutant testis cells, RA, and cytokines, were identified as haploid spermatids by the prominent expression of Prm1, Tnp1, Haprin, and Acr on day 14. Moreover, the methylation status of fSLCs was comparable to that of sperm. The major Igf2r and H19 DMRs in fSLCs were demethylated and methylated, respectively.

In the field of reproduction, there is increasing interest in using mammalian stem cells to produce germ cells. Much progress has been made in in vitro germ cell differentiation [3, 44,45,46]. A three-dimensional induction (3d-i) system can effectively differentiate human SSCs into functional haploid sperm cells [47]. Embryonic stem cells co-cultured with Kit mutant testis cells, RA, and cytokines can also undergo complete meiosis and produce SLCs, and healthy offspring can be produced after ICSI [43]. However, no studies addressing the transdifferentiation of mammalian XX female stem cells into functional sperm have been reported. To our knowledge, our study is the first of its kind and also provides a strategy for dairy cattle breeding to produce only female offspring with a high-quality genetic background. The strategy involves FGSCs isolated from the ovaries of high-quality dairy cattle, without being transfected with any foreign genes, being cultured in a microenvironment composed of testis somatic cells, RA, and cytokines to obtain functional SLCs. Healthy offspring with very similar genetic backgrounds can be produced after ICSI with MII eggs derived from the ovaries of dairy cattle. This strategy will not only greatly simplify the process and shorten the time needed to breed high-quality dairy cattle, but will also increase the number of high-quality dairy cattle. However, much work needs to be done before this strategy can be implemented. First, the mechanism by which masculinizing signals induce the transdifferentiation of FGSCs remains unknown. Second, the low transdifferentiation efficiency in vitro may be due to the apoptosis or death of some FGSCs under such differentiation conditions, such as no serum, RA and other factors (Fig. 3D). The efficiency of FGSC transdifferentiation should be improved, possibly by using small-molecule compounds or other cytokines, or by modifying the culture conditions.

Conclusion

Our findings indicate that, in mice, FGSCs without a Y chromosome can complete male meiosis and develop into functional sperm and SLCs within the testicular microenvironment and cytokine conditions. This study indicates that sperm can be produced from FGSCs without a Y chromosome, and provides a strategy for dairy cattle breeding to produce only female offspring with a high-quality genetic background.

Methods

Animals

We purchased Kitw/wv mutant mice from the Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). We purchased C57BL/6 mice from SLRC Laboratory (Shanghai, China). All animal experimental procedures were approved by the institutional animal care and use committee of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (2016084), and the National Research Council Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

FGSC isolation and culture

We isolated and purified FGSCs from neonatal mouse ovaries (6 days old, C57BL/6) following a previously described protocol [31]. To trace cells during in vivo and in vitro transdifferentiation, FGSCs were derived from actin-GFP mice. For immunofluorescence and infection with lentivirus carrying STRA8-EGFP or PRM1-EBFP plasmids, FGSCs were derived from wild-type mice. We cultured FGSCs on SIM-6-thiogunanie-oualiain(STO) feeder cells in MEMα basal medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Life Technologies), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Amresco), 2 mML-glutamine (Amresco), 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Biotech), 1 mMnonessential amino acids (NEAA) (Invitrogen), 20 ng/ml mouse epidermal growth factor (EGF) (PeproTech), 10 ng/ml human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) (PeproTech), 10 ng/ml mouse glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) (PeproTech), and 10 ng/ml ESGRO (mouse leukemia inhibitory factor, LIF) (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). FGSCs were identified by immunofluorescence staining (Positive expression of FRAGILIS, MVH, and OCT4; negative expression of PLZF.) and RT-PCR (Additional file 1: Figure S1).

SSC isolation and culture

We isolated and purified SSCs from neonatal mouse testes (6 days old, C57BL/6) following a previously described protocol [48]. We cultured SSCs on STO feeder cells in MEMα basal medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS (Life Technologies), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (Amresco), 2 mM L-glutamine (Amresco), 50 μM β-mercaptoethanol (Biotech), 1 mM NEAA (Invitrogen), 20 ng/ml mouse EGF (PeproTech), 10 ng/ml human bFGF (PeproTech), 10 ng/ml mouse GDNF (PeproTech), 10 ng/ml ESGRO (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and 100 μg/ml transferrin (Sigma). Spermatogonial stem cells were identified by immunofluorescence staining and RT-PCR (Additional file 1: Figure S2).

Transplantation of FGSCs into recipient testes

FGSCs were derived from C57BL/6 mouse ovaries and cultured for eight passages. Then, they were digested into single-cell suspensions using 0.05% trypsin (Gibco) and suspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). The FGSCs were transplanted into histocompatible Kitw/wv mutant mice. Only 6- to 8-week-old male mice were used as recipients. Then, 10 µl of cell suspension containing approximately 5 × 107 cells was injected into the testis reticulum of each testis.

Histological analysis

For whole-mount observation, two to three fragments of seminiferous tubules were dissected out from a testis organ culture under a stereomicroscope, washed with PBS containing 3% (vol/vol) FBS, mounted on a glass slide, and then observed under a fluorescence microscope. For whole-mount immunofluorescence, fragments were fixed with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 2 h at 4 °C, washed with PBS three times, blocked by PBS supplemented with 1% BSA for 1 h at room temperature, and then incubated overnight with primary antibodies in PBS at 4 °C. The next day, the tubules were washed with 0.1% Tween 20 in PBS (PBST) and incubated with secondary antibodies in PBS at room temperature for 2 h. After washing with PBST for 15 min, several pieces of seminiferous tubule were mounted on a glass slide, and then observed under a fluorescence microscope. The primary antibodies used were PLZF (1:150; Santa Cruz) and GFP (1:200; Santa Cruz).

Twenty to fifty days after transplantation, the recipient testes were removed from the mice, fixed by 4% PFA for 48 h at 4 °C, and then processed for paraffin sectioning. Sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). For immunofluorescence, the sections were boiled for 15 min in sodium citrate buffer for antigen retrieval. After blocking with goat serum for 30 min, each section was incubated with a primary antibody overnight at 4 °C and then washed in PBS three times. Germ cells were detected by immunofluorescence staining using an anti-MVH antibody (Abcam). Meiosis was detected by immunofluorescence using an anti-SCP3 antibody (Abcam). Post-meiosis spermatids were detected by immunofluorescence staining using an anti-ACR antibody (Santa Cruz). After washing in PBS three times, the sections were incubated with TRITC-conjugated secondary antibody (Proteintec) at a dilution of 1:200 for 1 h at 37 °C. Next, nuclei were stained with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI). Images were collected immediately using a fluorescence microscope (Leica, Germany).

Fusion gene constructs and lentivirus infection

STRA8-EGFP was constructed by combining a 1.4 kb Stra8 promoter with an EGFP sequence by overlap PCR [24]. The Stra8 promoter was amplified by genomic PCR with the primers 5′-CTTGCCTCCAAGGGGGTAAGG-3′ and 5′-CGACTGCCCGTCGCAGAATA-3′. PRM1-EBFP was constructed by combining a + 652/ + 2 fragment (Prm1 promoter, + 1 indicates the translation start site) with an EBFP sequence by overlap PCR. The + 652/ + 2 fragment was amplified by genomic PCR with the primers 5′-GTCTAGTAATGTCCAACACCT-3′ and 5′-GGTGCTGGCTTGGCCGGGAGC-3′. Both FGSCs and SSCs were infected with lentivirus carrying STRA8-EGFP or PRM1-EBFP plasmids (plvx-mcherry-N1, FENGHUISHENGWU, FH1891).

In Vitro spermatogenesis

Testes from 2- to 7-day postpartum Kitw/wv mice were harvested and extracted following a previously described protocol [49, 50]. Briefly, after euthanasia by cervical dislocation, testes were collected, decapsulated, cut into small pieces, and then dissociated with collagenase IV (1 mg/ml, Sigma) for 10 min and in 0.05% trypsin (Gibco) for 6 min at 37 °C in a shaking water bath. A single-cell suspension was obtained after filtration through a 72-µm cell strainer, and cells were collected by centrifugation. Kitw/wv mouse testicular cells were directly mixed with FGSCs/SSCs at a ratio of 1:1 or FGSCs/SSCs were seeded on Kitw/wv mouse testicular cells that had been cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% FBS for 3 days. From day 0 to day 6, cells were cultured in MEMα (Invitrogen) containing 20% Knockout Serum Replacement (KSR) (Gibco), bone morphogenic proteins 2/4/7 (BMP-2/4/7, 20 ng/ml each; R&D Systems), retinoic acid (1 μM; Sigma), and activin A (100 ng/ml; R&D Systems). From day 7 to day 14, cells were cultured in MEMα (Invitrogen) supplemented with 20% KSR, testosterone (T, 10 mM; Acros Organics), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH, 200 ng/ml; Sigma), and bovine pituitary extract (BPE, 50 mg/ml; Stem Cell). The medium was changed every day. Cells were cultured in 5% CO2 at 37 °C.

RT-PCR analysis

Total mRNA were extracted using Trizol reagent (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was reverse-transcribed from total mRNA using M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Takara) and was then used for PCR analysis. Primer information is listed in Additional file 1: Table S1.

Spermatocyte surface spreading

A previously described drying-down technique was used to spread spermatocytes generated by in vitro spermatogenesis [51]. Briefly, the cells were digested into single-cell suspensions using 0.05% trypsin (Gibco) and washed with PBS. Then, the cells were placed into freshly prepared buffer (30 mM Tris, pH 8.2; 50 mM sucrose; 17 mM citric acid; 5 mM EDTA; 0.5 mM DTT; 0.1 mM PMSF, pH 8.2–8.4) for 30–60 min. Subsequently, the cells were collected by centrifugation (350 × g, 5 min) and put into 100 mM sucrose (pH 8.2) for 20 min. Finally, the cell suspensions were placed on slides containing 1% PFA, pH 9.2, and 0.15% Triton X-100, which were then dried overnight in a closed box with high humidity.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

For immunofluorescence, cultured cells were fixed with 4% PFA in PBS (pH 7.4) for 30 min, washed three times with PBST, followed by incubation with 1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min (for cells spread with PMSF, this step was omitted). Cells or slides were blocked by PBS containing 5% goat serum for 1 h at room temperature, and then incubated with primary antibodies diluted in PBS overnight at 4 °C. Primary antibodies were diluted with PBS as follows: MVH (1:200; Abcam), FRAGILIS (1:100; Abcam), OCT4 (1:100; Abcam), PLZF (1:100; Santa Cruz), SCP3 (1:50; Abcam), SCP1 (1:50; Santa Cruz), and ACROSIN (1:50; Santa Cruz). After incubation, the slides or cells were washed with PBST and then incubated with TRITC- or FITC-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200; Invitrogen) in PBS at 37 °C, followed by washing and staining with DAPI.

DNA content staining for FACS analysis

Differentiated cells were digested into single-cell suspensions using 0.05% trypsin (Gibco), fixed with 70% ethanol at 4 °C for 30 min, and then passed through a cell strainer with a 40 µm pore size. Cells were resuspended in PBS supplemented with 3% FBS and then incubated in PBS containing 0.2 mg/ml RNase A, 0.02 mg/ml propidium iodide, and 0.1% Triton X-100 for 15 min at 37 °C. The cell suspension was analyzed and sorted by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson).

Low-input Hi-C Library generation

We performed in situ Hi-C using a modified protocol based on previous reports [52,53,54,55]. Briefly, ~ 10,000 cells were fixed with 1% PFA for 10 min, and then fixation was stopped with glycine. Lysed cells were digested with DpnII (NEB, R0543M), and chromatin ends were filled and marked with biotin-14-dATP (Life Technologies). The purified DNA was fragmented with AluI (NEB, R0137V) and size-selected. The DNA fragments were enriched via the biotin pull-down assay. A DNA Library Prep Kit (Vazyme, ND607-01) was used to construct a standard DNA library, which was sequenced using the Illumina sequencing platform. For each stage, we sequenced 8.0–9.0 billion Hi-C reads, resulting in 73–386 million pairwise chromatin contacts (Additional file 1: Table S2).

μChIP-seq

We performed μChIP-seq by using approximately 10,000 cells per reaction and two replicates for each stage. Cells were isolated by FACS based on EGFP- or EBFP-positive expression. Briefly, cells were fixed in 1% PFA, which was terminated with 125 mM glycine. After centrifugation (550 × g), the supernatant was carefully aspirated and the pellet was resuspended in ChIP Lysis Buffer (200 μl) (Beyotime) for 10 min. The lysate was then sonicated to shear DNA to an average fragment size of 200–500 bp. From each sonicated sample, 50 μl was retained as the input. Then, the rest of the sample was reacted in RIPA buffer (Beyotime) at 4 °C overnight with H3K4me3 (ab8580; Abcam) or H3K27me3 (07–449; Millipore) antibodies, which were pre-bonded to paramagnetic beads (Promega). The beads were washed by RIPA buffer and the tubes were placed in a magnetic rack. DNA was isolated and purified using proteinase K (Merck), phenol–chloroform-isoamylalcohol (25:24:1) (Bio-Rad), chloroform-isoamylalcohol (24:1) (Bio-Rad), 100% ethanol, and 75% ethanol.

In accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions, we generated sequencing libraries by using a VAHTS Universal DNA Library Prep Kit (Vazyme, ND607-01). We then sequenced the libraries using the Illumina sequencing platform.

Bisulfite sequencing analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted from mouse tail, FGSCs, SSCs, SLCs or sperm. Genomic DNA (15–20 ng) was then processed using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold Kit™ (ZYMO Research), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The bisulfite-treated genomic DNA (4–5 μl) was amplified by PCR, the primers for which are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. The PCR fragments were cloned in pMD19-T, sequenced, and analyzed using QUMA software.

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and embryo transfer

The injection procedure was performed as previously described [25]. Briefly, BDF1 mice were used as oocyte donors. fSLCs (GFP-positive and haploid cells) were sorted using FACS and sperm were taken from the epididymal tail. Cytoplasm was removed from these sorted fSLCs, which were then injected together with sperm into cumulus-free oocytes. GFP was monitored under fluorescence microscopy at different development stages. Embryos that reached the two-cell stage after culture for 24 h were transferred to the oviduct of embryonic day (E)0.5 CD1 pseudo-pregnant females or further cultured in KSOMAA medium until the blastocyst stage. Full-term pups were delivered naturally.

Southern blotting

Genomic DNA of mouse tails was extracted. After digestion by EcoRI, samples were loaded onto a 1% agarose gel and run at 35 V for 17 h. After denaturation and neutralization, DNA was transferred by capillary action to a nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL, USA). After prehybridization, hybridization was carried out with a GFP probe. Signals were then detected using a CDP-Start kit (GE Healthcare).

Karyotype analysis

Cultured cells were treated with colchicine (100 ng/mL, Sangon) for 2.5 h and hypotonically treated with 75 mM KCl for 40 min at 37 °C. Then, the cells were fixed in methanol-acetic acid (3:1) overnight at 4 °C. The fixed cells were then dropped onto a glass slide from a height of approximately 1 m, air-dried, and stained with Giemsa (Sangon).

Statistical analysis

To evaluate the significance of differences between groups, one-way ANOVA or t-test was used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Hi-C data mapping

Hi-C data were processed using Hi-CPro (version 2.11.1), as previously described [56]. Briefly, paired-end reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome (mm9) using Bowtie2 (version 2.3.5.1). Then, we discarded unmapped reads, singletons, self-circle ligations, and PCR duplicates, and obtained the valid reads with which to build the matrix for downstream analysis.

A/B compartment identification

A/B compartment analysis was performed at 400 kb resolution using R package (HiTC) [57] with the pca. Hi-C function in R on the matrix. A positive value represented the A compartment, while negative value represented the B compartment.

TAD calling

The boundaries were calculated using the directional index (DI) value at 20 kb resolution, as previously described [58]. TAD boundaries were defined as those < 400 kb.

ChIP-seq analysis

The paired-end reads of ChIP-seq were mapped to the mouse reference genome (mm9) using Bowtie2. Duplicate reads were removed with SAMtools (version 1.9). Then, the reads were allocated into 50-bp bins and normalized to 1 × genome coverage. MACS2 was used to call peaks with the adjusted P-value cut-off set as 0.01.

Availability of data and materials

All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Additional files 1. Raw sequence data of Hi-C and ChIP-seq have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under Accession number GSE163931. Additional data related to this paper may be requested from the authors.

References

  1. Li X, Sun T, Wang X, Tang J, Liu Y. Restore natural fertility of Kit(w)/Kit(wv) mouse with nonobstructive azoospermia through gene editing on SSCs mediated by CRISPR-Cas9. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2019;10(1):271.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Ohta H, Tohda A, Nishimune Y. Proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells in the w/wv mutant mouse testis. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(6):1815–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng SL, Chen SR, Wang ZP, Zhang Y, Tang JX, Li J, Wang XX, Cheng JM, Jin C, Li XY, Zhang BL, Yu K, Lian ZX, Liu GS, Liu YX. Melatonin promotes development of haploid germ cells from early developing spermatogenic cells of Suffolk sheep under in vitro condition. J Pineal Res. 2016;60(4):435–47.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Feil R, Fraga MF. Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(2):97–109.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ordovas JM, Smith CE. Epigenetics and cardiovascular disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7(9):510–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Johnson C, Warmoes MO, Shen X, Locasale JW. Epigenetics and cancer metabolism. Cancer Lett. 2015;356((2 Pt A)):309–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammoud SS, Low DH, Yi C, Carrell DT, Guccione E, Cairns BR. Chromatin and transcription transitions of mammalian adult germline stem cells and spermatogenesis. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;15(2):239–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Vara C, Paytuvi-Gallart A, Cuartero Y, Le Dily F, Garcia F, Salva-Castro J, Gomez HL, Julia E, Moutinho C, Aiese Cigliano R, Sanseverino W, Fornas O, Pendas AM, Heyn H, Waters PD, Marti-Renom MA, et al. Three-dimensional genomic structure and cohesin occupancy correlate with transcriptional activity during spermatogenesis. Cell Rep. 2019;28(2):352-367 e359.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, Du Z, Si W, Fan S, Qin D, Wang M, Duan Y, Li L, Jiao Y, Li Y, Wang Q, Shi Q, Wu X, Xie W. Reprogramming of meiotic chromatin architecture during spermatogenesis. Mol Cell. 2019;73(3):547–61 e 546.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Erkek S, Hisano M, Liang CY, Gill M, Murr R, Dieker J, Schubeler D, van der Vlag J, Stadler MB, Peters AH. Molecular determinants of nucleosome retention at CpG-rich sequences in mouse spermatozoa. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2013;20(7):868–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lesch BJ, Dokshin GA, Young RA, McCarrey JR, Page DC. A set of genes critical to development is epigenetically poised in mouse germ cells from fetal stages through completion of meiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(40):16061–6.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellott DW, Hughes JF, Skaletsky H, Brown LG, Pyntikova T, Cho TJ, Koutseva N, Zaghlul S, Graves T, Rock S, Kremitzki C, Fulton RS, Dugan S, Ding Y, Morton D, Khan Z, et al. Mammalian Y chromosomes retain widely expressed dosage-sensitive regulators. Nature. 2014;508(7497):494–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Soullier S, Hanni C, Catzeflis F, Berta P, Laudet V. Male sex determination in the spiny rat Tokudaia osimensis (Rodentia: Muridae) is not Sry dependent. Mamm Genome. 1998;9(7):590–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kobayashi T, Yamada F, Hashimoto T, Abe S, Matsuda Y, Kuroiwa A. Exceptional minute sex-specific region in the X0 mammal, Ryukyu spiny rat. Chromosome Res. 2007;15(2):175–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Eozenou C, Gonen N, Touzon MS, Jorgensen A, Yatsenko SA, Fusee L, Kamel AK, Gellen B, Guercio G, Singh P, Witchel S, Berman AJ, Mainpal R, Totonchi M, Mohseni Meybodi A, Askari M, et al. Testis formation in XX individuals resulting from novel pathogenic variants in Wilms’ tumor 1 (WT1) gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020;117(24):13680–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gonen N, Lovell-Badge R. The regulation of Sox9 expression in the gonad. Curr Top Dev Biol. 2019;134:223–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yamauchi Y, Riel JM, Stoytcheva Z, Ward MA. Two Y genes can replace the entire Y chromosome for assisted reproduction in the mouse. Science. 2014;343(6166):69–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gonen N, Futtner CR, Wood S, Garcia-Moreno SA, Salamone IM, Samson SC, Sekido R, Poulat F, Maatouk DM, Lovell-Badge R. Sex reversal following deletion of a single distal enhancer of Sox9. Science. 2018;360(6396):1469–73.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Stevant I, Nef S. Genetic control of gonadal sex determination and development. Trends Genet. 2019;35(5):346–58.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pannetier M, Mandon-Pepin B, Copelli S, Fellous M. Molecular aspects of female and male gonadal development in mammals. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2004;1(3):274–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sato T, Katagiri K, Gohbara A, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Ogura A, Kubota Y, Ogawa T. In vitro production of functional sperm in cultured neonatal mouse testes. Nature. 2011;471(7339):504–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Durruthy Durruthy J, Ramathal C, Sukhwani M, Fang F, Cui J, Orwig KE, Reijo Pera RA. Fate of induced pluripotent stem cells following transplantation to murine seminiferous tubules. Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(12):3071–84.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yuan L, Liu JG, Zhao J, Brundell E, Daneholt B, Hoog C. The murine SCP3 gene is required for synaptonemal complex assembly, chromosome synapsis, and male fertility. Mol Cell. 2000;5(1):73–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nayernia K, Li M, Jaroszynski L, Khusainov R, Wulf G, Schwandt I, Korabiowska M, Michelmann HW, Meinhardt A, Engel W. Stem cell based therapeutical approach of male infertility by teratocarcinoma derived germ cells. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(14):1451–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nayernia K, Nolte J, Michelmann HW, Lee JH, Rathsack K, Drusenheimer N, Dev A, Wulf G, Ehrmann IE, Elliott DJ, Okpanyi V, Zechner U, Haaf T, Meinhardt A, Engel W. In vitro-differentiated embryonic stem cells give rise to male gametes that can generate offspring mice. Dev Cell. 2006;11(1):125–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zambrowicz BP, Harendza CJ, Zimmermann JW, Brinster RL, Palmiter RD. Analysis of the mouse protamine 1 promoter in transgenic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1993;90(11):5071–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernstein BE, Mikkelsen TS, Xie X, Kamal M, Huebert DJ, Cuff J, Fry B, Meissner A, Wernig M, Plath K, Jaenisch R, Wagschal A, Feil R, Schreiber SL, Lander ES. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2006;125(2):315–26.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu Y, Giannopoulou EG, Wen D, Falciatori I, Elemento O, Allis CD, Rafii S, Seandel M. Epigenetic profiles signify cell fate plasticity in unipotent spermatogonial stem and progenitor cells. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11275.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang XL, Wu J, Wang J, Shen T, Li H, Lu J, Gu Y, Kang Y, Wong CH, Ngan CY, Shao Z, Wu J, Zhao X. Integrative epigenomic analysis reveals unique epigenetic signatures involved in unipotency of mouse female germline stem cells. Genome Biol. 2016;17(1):162.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Tian G, Zhao X, Xie W, Li X, Hou C, Wang Y, Wang L, Zhao X, Li H, Li J, Wu J. Three-dimensional genome structure reveals distinct chromatin signatures of mouse female germline stem cells during development. BioRxiv. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1101/787689.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zou K, Yuan Z, Yang Z, Luo H, Sun K, Zhou L, Xiang J, Shi L, Yu Q, Zhang Y, Hou R, Wu J. Production of offspring from a germline stem cell line derived from neonatal ovaries. Nat Cell Biol. 2009;11(5):631–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. White YA, Woods DC, Takai Y, Ishihara O, Seki H, Tilly JL. Oocyte formation by mitotically active germ cells purified from ovaries of reproductive-age women. Nat Med. 2012;18(3):413–21.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhang C, Wu J. Production of offspring from a germline stem cell line derived from prepubertal ovaries of germline reporter mice. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22(7):457–64.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou L, Wang L, Kang JX, Xie W, Li X, Wu C, Xu B, Wu J. Production of fat-1 transgenic rats using a post-natal female germline stem cell line. Mol Hum Reprod. 2014;20(3):271–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Ding X, Liu G, Xu B, Wu C, Hui N, Ni X, Wang J, Du M, Teng X, Wu J. Human GV oocytes generated by mitotically active germ cells obtained from follicular aspirates. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28218.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Y, Yang Z, Yang Y, Wang S, Shi L, Xie W, Sun K, Zou K, Wang L, Xiong J, Xiang J, Wu J. Production of transgenic mice by random recombination of targeted genes in female germline stem cells. J Mol Cell Biol. 2011;3(2):132–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Xiong J, Lu Z, Wu M, Zhang J, Cheng J, Luo A, Shen W, Fang L, Zhou S, Wang S. Intraovarian transplantation of female germline stem cells rescue ovarian function in chemotherapy-injured ovaries. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(10): e0139824.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Park ES, Tilly JL. Use of DEAD-box polypeptide-4 (Ddx4) gene promoter-driven fluorescent reporter mice to identify mitotically active germ cells in post-natal mouse ovaries. Mol Hum Reprod. 2015;21(1):58–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lu Z, Wu M, Zhang J, Xiong J, Cheng J, Shen W, Luo A, Fang L, Wang S. Improvement in isolation and identification of mouse oogonial stem cells. Stem cells Int. 2016;2016:2749461.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Khosravi-Farsani S, Amidi F, Habibi Roudkenar M, Sobhani A. Isolation and enrichment of mouse female germ line stem cells. Cell J. 2015;16(4):406–15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Guo K, Li CH, Wang XY, He DJ, Zheng P. Germ stem cells are active in postnatal mouse ovary under physiological conditions. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22(5):316–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Gill ME, Hu YC, Lin Y, Page DC. Licensing of gametogenesis, dependent on RNA binding protein DAZL, as a gateway to sexual differentiation of fetal germ cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108(18):7443–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Zhou Q, Wang M, Yuan Y, Wang X, Fu R, Wan H, Xie M, Liu M, Guo X, Zheng Y, Feng G, Shi Q, Zhao XY, Sha J, Zhou Q. Complete meiosis from embryonic stem cell-derived germ cells in vitro. Cell Stem Cell. 2016;18(3):330–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Sato T, Katagiri K, Kojima K, Komeya M, Yao M, Ogawa T. In vitro spermatogenesis in explanted adult mouse testis tissues. PLos ONE. 2015;10(6): e0130171.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sato T, Katagiri K, Yokonishi T, Kubota Y, Inoue K, Ogonuki N, Matoba S, Ogura A, Ogawa T. In vitro production of fertile sperm from murine spermatogonial stem cell lines. Nat Commun. 2011;2:472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Tesarik J. Overcoming maturation arrest by in vitro spermatogenesis: search for the optimal culture system. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(5):1417–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Huleihel M, Nourashrafeddin S, Plant TM. Application of three-dimensional culture systems to study mammalian spermatogenesis, with an emphasis on the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Asian J Androl. 2015;17(6):972–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Yuan Z, Hou R, Wu J. Generation of mice by transplantation of an adult spermatogonial cell line after cryopreservation. Cell Prolif. 2009;42(2):123–31.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Bellve AR. Purification, culture, and fractionation of spermatogenic cells. Methods Enzymol. 1993;225:84–113.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Bellve AR, Cavicchia JC, Millette CF, O’Brien DA, Bhatnagar YM, Dym M. Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse. Isolation and morphological characterization. J Cell Biol. 1977;74(1):68–85.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Peters AH, Plug AW, van Vugt MJ, de Boer P. A drying-down technique for the spreading of mammalian meiocytes from the male and female germline. Chromosome Res. 1997;5(1):66–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Diaz N, Kruse K, Erdmann T, Staiger AM, Ott G, Lenz G, Vaquerizas JM. Chromatin conformation analysis of primary patient tissue using a low input Hi-C method. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4938.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Ke Y, Xu Y, Chen X, Feng S, Liu Z, Sun Y, Yao X, Li F, Zhu W, Gao L, Chen H, Du Z, Xie W, Xu X, Huang X, Liu J. 3D Chromatin structures of mature gametes and structural reprogramming during mammalian embryogenesis. Cell. 2017;170(2):367-381 e320.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Rao SS, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, Sanborn AL, Machol I, Omer AD, Lander ES, Aiden EL. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159(7):1665–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Tian GG, Li J, Wu J. Alternative splicing signatures in preimplantation embryo development. Cell Biosci. 2020;10:33.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Servant N, Varoquaux N, Lajoie BR, Viara E, Chen CJ, Vert JP, Heard E, Dekker J, Barillot E. HiC-Pro: an optimized and flexible pipeline for Hi-C data processing. Genome Biol. 2015;16:259.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Servant N, Lajoie BR, Nora EP, Giorgetti L, Chen CJ, Heard E, Dekker J, Barillot E. HiTC: exploration of high-throughput ‘C’ experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(21):2843–4.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, Hu M, Liu JS, Ren B. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012;485(7398):376–80.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Haixia Jiang from Core Facility and Technical Service Center for SLSB, School of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University for technical support for FACS analysis.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (2018YFC1003501 and 2017YFA0504201), National Natural Science Foundation of China (81720108017), National Major Scientific Instruments and Equipment Development Project, National Nature Science Foundation of China (61827814), and Major Project of Key Research and Development program of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region (2019BFG02005).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Xiaopeng Hu, Hu Wang, Geng. G. Tian and Changliang Hou contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bio-X Institutes, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 800. Dongchuan Road, Minhang District, Shanghai, 200240, China

    Xiaopeng Hu, Hu Wang, Geng. G. Tian, Changliang Hou, Bo Xu, Yongqiang Zhao, Qian Fang, Xinyue Li, Lin He & Ji Wu

  2. State Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedicine Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, China

    Shangang Li

  3. Key Laboratory of Fertility Preservation and Maintenance of Ministry of Education, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China

    Xinyan Zhao & Ji Wu

  4. Department of Laboratory Animal Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 280 South Chongqing Road, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Xuejin Chen

  5. Shanghai Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, China

    Ji Wu

  6. Yunnan Key Laboratory of Primate Biomedicine Research, Institute of Primate Translational Medicine, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming, 650500, China

    Shangang Li

Authors
  1. Xiaopeng Hu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Geng. G. Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Changliang Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bo Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Xinyan Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yongqiang Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Qian Fang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Xinyue Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Lin He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Xuejin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Shangang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Ji Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Conceptualization-JW; methodology-SL, XH, HW and BX; investigation-XH, HW, GT, CH, XZ, YZ, QF and XL; data curation-SL, XH, GT, HC; writing-XH, HW, GT, CH, and JW; funding acquisition-JW; Supervision-JW, SL, XC and LH. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shangang Li or Ji Wu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All procedures involving animals were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Shanghai and conducted in accordance with the National Research Council Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1:

Table S1. Oligonucleotide primer sequences. Table S2. Valid Hi-C data. Figure S1. Characterization and identification of FGSCs. Figure S2. Characterization and identification of SSCs. Figure S3. FGSCs injected into Kitw/wv mouse seminiferous tubules transdifferentiate into male germ cells and express PLZF in a testicular microenvironment. Figure S4. PLZF was expressed in GFP positive cells by Immunofluorescence analysis. Figure S5. In vitro induction of meiosis in SSCs and formation of SLCs derived from SSCs. Figure S6. Comparison of in vitro transdifferentiation of FGSCs with in vitro differentiation of SSCs. Figure S7. Comparison between Hi-C seq and ChIP seq biological replicates. Figure S8. k-means clustering of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 at all TSSs in different cell states and enriched GO terms. Figure S9. The number of A/B compartments, genes in TADs, and genes outside of TADs in different cell states based on four clusters. Figure S10. Methylation and expression analysis of imprinted genes.

Additional file 2.

Graphic abstract.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, X., Wang, H., Tian, G.G. et al. Offspring production of haploid spermatid-like cells derived from mouse female germline stem cells with chromatin condensation. Cell Biosci 12, 5 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00697-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-021-00697-z

Keywords

  • Female germline stem cells
  • Transdifferentiation
  • In vitro spermatogenesis
  • Spermatid-like cells
  • High-throughput chromosome conformation capture sequencing
  • Bivalent

Cell & Bioscience

ISSN: 2045-3701

Contact us