Anti-oxidative stress regulator NF-E2-related factor 2 mediates the adaptive induction of antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes by lipid peroxidation metabolite 4-hydroxynonenal

Background

NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) regulates a battery of antioxidative and phase II drug metabolizing/detoxifying genes through binding to the antioxidant response elements (ARE). NRF2-ARE signaling plays a central role in protecting cells from a wide spectrum of reactive toxic species including reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (RONS). 4-hydroxylnonenal (4-HNE) is a major end product from lipid peroxidation of omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) induced by oxidative stress, and it is highly reactive to nucleophilic sites in DNA and proteins, causing cytotoxicity and genotoxicity. In this study, we examined the role of NRF2 in regulating the 4-HNE induced gene expression of antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes.

Results

When HeLa cells were treated with 4-HNE, NRF2 rapidly transloated into the nucleus, as determined by the distribution of NRF2 tagged with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and increased NRF2 protein in the nuclear fraction. Transcriptional activity of ARE-luciferase was significantly induced by 0.01-10 μM of 4-HNE in a dose-dependent manner, and the induction could be blocked by pretreatment with glutathione (GSH). 4-HNE induced transcriptional expression of glutathione S-transferase (GST) A4, aldoketone reductase (AKR) 1C1 and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and the induction was attenuated by knocking down NRF2 using small interfering RNA.

Conclusions

NRF2 is critical in mediating 4-HNE induced expression of antioxidant and detoxifying genes. This may account for one of the major cellular defense mechanisms against reactive metabolites of lipids peroxidation induced by oxidative stress and protect cells from cytotoxicity.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), essential components of cell membrane, are susceptible to oxidation initiated by free radicals[1]. 4-hydroxylnonenal (4-HNE) is an end product from lipid peroxidation of omega-6 (n-6) PUFA[2]. The physiological concentration of 4-HNE is generally at the low micromolar level, but is remarkably increased under continuous oxidative stress[3]. As an α,β-unsaturated aldehyde, 4-HNE is highly reactive to a variety of nucleophilic sites in DNA and proteins[4]. Exposure to excessive 4-HNE can cause cytotoxicity, inactivation of enzymes, redox imbalance and activation of multiple signaling events, and 4-HNE is implied in the detrimental pathogenesis of a number of degenerative diseases including cancer[5, 6]. Several metabolic pathways are involved in the detoxification of 4-HNE, including conjugation with glutathione (GSH) catalyzed by glutathione S-transferases (GST) and reduction of the aldehyde group to corresponding alcohol by aldoketone reductases (AKR)[5].

Eukaryotic cells have developed highly efficient machineries to counteract oxidative stress from environmental insults and aerobic metabolisms[7]. Antioxidant response elements (ARE) are identified in the regulatory region of many cytoprotective genes that encode phase II drug metabolizing/detoxifying enzymes, antioxidant enzymes and phase III transporters[8, 9]. When oxidative stress is elevated, NF-E2-related factor 2 (NRF2) will be activated to trigger gene expression through binding to ARE[10]. Subsequently, it leads to enhanced cellular capability to remove excess electrophiles and restore redox homeostasis[11].

NRF2 activity is regulated in part by a repressor protein, Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (KEAP1), which retains NRF2 in the cytoplasm and mediates its degradation under homeostatic conditions[12]. Stimuli such as dietary antioxidants, heavy metals and reactive oxygen species (ROS) can disrupt the NRF2-KEAP1 binding and induce nuclear translocation of NRF2 where it dimerizes with small Maf proteins and binds to ARE[12]. In addition, some studies have shown that the subcellular distribution of NRF2 can also be controlled by the net driving force of nuclear location signals (NLS) and nuclear export signals (NES)[13] and phosphorylation of NRF2[7] .

In this study, we investigated the role of NRF2 in regulating the gene expression of antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes upon the exposure to 4-HNE. Our results show that NRF2 rapidly translocates into nucleus after exposure to 4-HNE and induces transcriptional activity of ARE and mRNA expressions of AKR1C1, GSTA4 and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1). The induction of these detoxifying enzymes is diminished when NRF2 is knocked down using small interfering RNA.

NRF2 translocates into the nucleus after 4-HNE treatment

When expressed in HeLa cells, NRF2 tagged with the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) exhibited a heterologous distribution pattern (Figure1B). Cell percentage assay showed that 64% of cells exhibited a whole cell distribution pattern. About 15% of cells showed a nuclear distribution (Figure1B, arrow) and 21% of cells showed a cytosolic distribution (Figure1B, arrowhead). After treatment with 10 μM 4-HNE for 30 min, nearly 90% of cells exhibited a nuclear distribution (Figure1B), indicating robust nuclear translocation of NRF2.

4-HNE treatment induces NRF2 nuclear translocation. (A) The schematic diagram showing the structures of NRF2 constructs used in the study. (B) Under the untreated condition, EGFP-NRF2 exhibited a mixed pattern of nuclear (arrow), whole cell and cytosolic (arrowhead) distribution. After treatment of 10 μM 4-HNE for 30 min, a predominantly nuclear distribution was observed. Scale bar: 10 μm. (C) Time course of nuclear NRF2 accumulation after 10 μM 4-HNE treatment. *: P < 0.05. (D) Deletion of the KEAP1-binding domain (NRF2ΔN) did not affect 4-HNE induced nuclear translocation of NRF2.

Full size image

To further confirm the nuclear translocation effect elicited by 4-HNE, we examined the nuclear NRF2 protein level by Western blotting analyses. HeLa cells were treated with 10 μM 4-HNE for 0, 0.5,1 and 4 h. 4-HNE markedly elevated the nuclear NRF2 protein level, with the highest accumulation at 0.5 h after treatment (Figure1C). Similar effects have been observed in PC12 cells and vascular endothelial cells[14, 15].

Next, the N-terminal truncation mutant of NRF2 (EGFP-NRF2ΔN, Figure1D) lacking the KEAP1 domain, was expressed in HeLa cells. Under the unstressed condition, EGFP-NRF2ΔN demonstrated a heterologous distribution pattern (Figure1D). Treatment with 10 μM 4-HNE (30 min) converted the distribution of EGFP-NRF2ΔN to a predominant nuclear pattern (Figure1D). Previous study showed that no NRF2ΔN/KEAP1 binding was detected when NRF2ΔN was co-expressed with KEAP1[16]. Since NRF2ΔN is free from KEAP1 sequestration in the cytosol, the NRF2ΔN distribution can be deemed as free floating in the cell. These results show that 4-HNE can directly affect the subcellular distribution of NRF2 into the nucleus.

ARE-luciferase activity increases after 4-HNE treatment

To determine whether the nuclear accumulation of NRF2 could increase the transcriptional activity of ARE, we co-expressed 0.5 μg pcDNA3.1-NRF2 with 0.25 μg ARE-luciferase reporter in HeLa cells. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were treated with 0, 0.01, 0.1, 1, 10 μM 4-HNE for 30 min and then cultured in fresh medium for 6 h. HNE treatments elicited significant ARE-luciferase inductions in a dose-dependent manner (Figure2A).

ARE -luciferase activity significantly increases by 4-HNE treatment. (A) HeLa cells were transiently transfected with ARE-luciferase construct for 24 h and treated with 0.01-10 μM 4-HNE. Cells were harvested and lysed after 6 h, and luciferase activity was measured. (B) HepG2 cells stably expressed with ARE-luciferase reporter gene were treated with 10 μM 4-HNE with or without 2 h pretreatment of 5 mM GSH. Cells were harvested and lysed after 18 h, and luciferase activity was measured. Relative fold of induction was obtained as compared to the untreated cells. *: P < 0.05.

Full size image

HepG2-C8 cells with stably expressed pARE-TI-luciferase constructs[17] were treated with 0 and 10 μM 4-HNE for 18 h. ARE-luciferase activity was significantly induced with 10 μM 4-HNE treatment compared with the untreated cells (Figure2B). Since the conjugation to GSH is the major metabolism pathway for 4-HNE, it will result in a net loss of intracellular GSH and redox imbalance. We found that when cells were pretreated with 5 mM GSH, the induction of ARE-luciferase activity was completely blocked (Figure2B).

NRF2 is critical in regulating the expression of detoxifying genes

When HeLa cells were treated with 4-HNE, in agreement with the enhanced ARE-luciferase activity, RT-PCR results showed that 4-HNE induced the transcription of AKR1C1, GSTA4 and HO-1 in a dose-dependent manner (Figure3A). To examine whether the induction of these detoxifying and antioxidant genes was dependent on NRF2, HeLa cells were transfected with NRF2 specific siRNA or nonspecific siRNA as a control. NRF2 expression was down-regulated by the siRNA transfection (Figure3B). In the cells transfected with control siRNA, the expression of AKR1C1, GSTA4 and HO-1 was markedly induced by 10 μM 4-HNE, while in the cells transfected with NRF2 siRNA, the induction of these genes was attenuated (Figure3B).

Effects of NRF2 on the mRNA expression of metabolizing and antioxidant enzymes. (A) HeLa cells were treated with 0, 0.1, 1 and 10 μM of 4-HNE for 6 h. mRNA expression of AKR1C1, GSTA4 and HO-1 was induced by 4-HNE in a dose-dependent manner. (B) HeLa cells were transfected with NRF2 specific or non-specific siRNA for 24 h, followed by 4-HNE treatment for 6 h. Knocking-down of NRF2 attenuated the induction of AKR1C1, GSTA4 and HO- 1by 4-HNE. Densitometry analyses of the PCR products were performed by Image J program, and the numbers at the top of each band are relative density compared to the control.

Full size image

It is well recognized that our body has a comprehensive antioxidant system to counter oxidative stress. 4-HNE, an oxidative stressor, causes adaptive induction of detoxifying enzymes such as AKR1C1 and GSTA4 in different cell lines[18, 19], although the molecular pathway is not fully understood. The common feature of these detoxifying genes is that they have ARE-like sequences in their 5’-flanking regions[20, 21]. In this study, we demonstrate that NRF2 mediates 4-HNE induced gene expression of key antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes, resulting in enhanced 4-HNE metabolism.

4-HNE is a highly reactive electrophile, and several studies have reported that it is a potent NRF2 inducer[14, 15]. Our current results further confirmed that the nuclear translocation of NRF2 is significantly increased by 10 μM 4-HNE treatment in HeLa cells (Figure1). There are several mechanisms proposed for the 4-HNE-induced NRF2 activation. 4-HNE can react with cysteine sites in the KEAP1 protein and that may disrupt the KEAP1-dependent degradation of NRF2[22]. In addition, 4-HNE may activate NRF2 through activation of upstream kinases such as protein kinase C, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase and phosphoinositide 3-kinase[14, 23, 24]. In this study, we showed that 4-HNE could induce nuclear translocation of the NRF2 mutant lacking the KEAP1 binding domain (Figure1D), indicating that 4-HNE may have a direct effect on NRF2 itself. We found that 4-HNE could modify NRF2 protein in an in vitro testing system (Additional file1: Figure S1), and future studies will be needed to identify the specific amino acid sites modified by 4-HNE and their impacts in NRF2 signaling. In addition, several studies have reported that 4-HNE treatment leads to dramatic decrease of intracellular GSH[25, 26], and depletion of GSH can activate NRF2 signaling[27]. In the present study, we showed that pretreatment of GSH could block the induction of ARE transcriptional activity by 4-HNE (Figure2B), suggesting that 4-HNE may activate NRF2 via depletion of GSH.

GSTA4 and AKR1C1 are two important enzymes for detoxification of 4-HNE. In the large GST family, GSTA4 is the most active isoform in catalyzing conjugation of GSH to 4-HNE[4]. The higher expression level of GSTA4 in DU145 prostate cancer cells is associated with faster 4-HNE metabolism rate, compared to PC3 or LNCaP prostate cancer cells[28]. It is also reported that overexpression of GSTA4 protects HepG2 cells from 4-HNE mediated oxidative injuries[29]. AKR1C1 has high catalytic activity in reducing 4-HNE to less toxic 1,4-dihydroxynonenol[19]. The role of HO-1 in the detoxification of 4-HNE is not clear. The induction of HO-1 may enhance the overall cellular antioxidant capacity and prevent oxidative stress induced cytotoxicity[15]. Therefore, the induction of gene expression of these cellular protective enzymes by 4-HNE appears to be an adaptive response to enhance elimination of 4-HNE and reduce its toxicity. The transcriptional induction of these detoxifying and antioxidant genes is attenuated when NRF2 is knocked down (Figure3C), indicating that the induction is mediated by NRF2.

In this study, we demonstrate that NRF2 regulates the enhanced gene expression of antioxidant and detoxifying enzymes by 4-HNE. Our study highlights the importance of the NRF2-ARE signaling mechanism in the detoxification of reactive lipid metabolites such as 4-HNE.

Cell culture and chemicals

Human cervical squamous cancerous HeLa cells and human hepatoma HepG2 cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). The establishment of stably expressed HepG2 cells with the ARE luciferase reporter was described previously[17]. Cells were cultured in Dolbecco’s modified eagle medium supplemented with 10% FBS. 4-HNE was purchased from Cayman Chemical (Ann Arbor, Michigan).

Cell fractionation and Western blotting

HeLa cells were treated with 10 μM of 4-HNE for 0, 0.5, 1 and 4 h, and then rinsed with ice-cold PBS and harvested. Nuclear protein was extracted using NE-PER nuclear and cytoplasmic protein extraction kits (Thermo scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. The protein concentration of each sample was measured, and 10 μg of nuclear proteins were used for Western blotting analyses. The details of Western blotting procedures were described previously[30]. Antibodies against NRF2 and Lamin A were from Epitomics and Santa Cruz, respectively. The densitometry of the bands were analyzed by ImageJ program.

Epifluorescent Microscopy

HeLa cells were cultured on ethanol-sterilized glass coverslips and transfected with 1 μg of EGFP-NRF2 or its EGFP-NRF2ΔN using the Lipofectamine method (Invitrogen) and further cultured in DMEM for 24 h. The generation of plasmids was described in our previous study[30]. After transfection, cells were treated with 10 μM of 4-HNE for 30 min. The expression and subcellular distribution of EGFP-tagged NRF2 and NRF2ΔN were examined using a Nikon Eclipse E600 epifluorescent microscope and a Nikon C-SHG1 UV light source purchased from Micron-Optics (Cedar Knolls, NJ). The EGFP signals were examined using FITC filters. The epifluorescent images were digitalized using the Nikon DXM1200 camera and Nikon ACT-1 software.

Luciferase Activity Assay

The HepG2-C8 cell line with a stably expressed pARE-TI-luciferase construct was previously established[17] and used to test the ARE transcriptional activity in this study. Cells were seeded in 6-well plates overnight, and then treated with 10 μM of 4-HNE for 18 h with or without pretreatment of 5 mM glutathione (GSH) for 2 h. Cells were then washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed with 1× reporter lysis buffer (Promega). A 10 μl lysate was mixed with the luciferase substrate (Promega) and the luciferase activity was measured using a Sirius luminometer (Berthold Detection System) and normalized by protein concentration.

Reverse Transcription-PCR

RNA was extracted using RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to manufacturer’s instructions and reverse transcribed (RT) using TaqMan® reverse transcription reagents (Applied Biosystems). The RT products were further analyzed by PCR reactions. The sequences of the PCR primers used are listed in Table1. The RT-PCR products were resolved in 1.5% agarose gel with ethidium bromide and visualized in UV light.

Transfection with siRNA

The sense and antisense sequences of siRNA against NRF2 and nonspecific sequences were described previously[31]. The siRNA oligomers were synthesized by Integrated DNA technologies. HeLa cells were transfected using Lipofectamin RNAiMAX reagent (Invitrogen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Cells were transfected for 48 h with 50 nM siRNA in Opi-MEM medium without antibiotics and serum. Then, the cells were treated with 10 μM 4-HNE for 6 h.

Statistical analyses

Fold induction of ARE- luciferase and relative densitometry of nuclear NRF2 protein were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, where 4-HNE concentration or the exposure time of 4-HNE was treated as the main effect, followed by Tukey’s studentized range test.

ARE:

Antioxidant response elements

AKR1C1:

Aldoketone reductase 1C1

EGFP:

The enhanced green fluorescent protein

GSH:

Glutathione

GSTA4:

Glutathione S-transferase A4

HO-1:

Heme oxygenase-1

4-HNE:

4-hydroxynonenal

KEAP1:

Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1

NRF2:

NF-E2-related factor 2.

The authors thank members in Dr. Kong’s group for discussions and technical support. This work was supported in part by NIH R01-CA118947, R01-CA152826, R01AT007065 from NCCAM and ODS, and P30ES005022.

Author notes

1. • Wenge Li

   Present address: Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA

Affiliations

1. Department of Pharmaceutics, Center for Cancer Prevention Research, Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, 160 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA

   • Ying Huang
   • , Wenge Li
   •  & Ah-Ng Tony Kong

2. Department of Genetics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, 1301 Morris Park Avenue, Bronx, NY, 10461, USA

   • Wenge Li

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ah-Ng Tony Kong.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

YH and WL designed, conducted the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; ANK designed, supervised the experiments and edited the manuscript; ANK has the primary responsibility for the final content; all the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Reprints and Permissions