Skip to main content

Incidence, distribution, disease spectrum, and genetic deficits of congenital heart defects in China: implementation of prenatal ultrasound screening identified 18,171 affected fetuses from 2,452,249 pregnancies

Abstract

Background

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are the most common birth defects. Assessment of the incidence, distribution, disease spectrum, and genetic deficits of fetal CHDs in China is urgently needed.

Methods

A national echocardiography screening program for fetal CHDs was implemented in 92 prenatal screening–diagnostic centers in China.

Findings

A total of 18,171 fetal CHD cases were identified from 2,452,249 pregnancies, resulting in 7·4/1,000 as the national incidence rate of fetal CHD. The incidences of fetal CHD in the six geographical regions, the southern, central, eastern, southwestern, northern, and northwestern, were 7·647 (CI: 7·383–7·915), 7·839 (CI: 7·680–8·000), 7·647 (CI: 7·383–7·915), 7·562 (CI: 7·225–7·907), 5·618 (CI: 5·337–5·906), and 4·716 (CI: 4·341–5·108), respectively, per 1,000 pregnancies. Overall, ventricular septal defect was the most common fetal CHD, accounting for 17.04% of screened pregnancies nationwide, and tetralogy of Fallot, the most common anomaly in the major defect of fetal CHD, was the second most common, accounting for 9.72%. A total of 76.24% cases of fetal CHD were found to be an isolated intracardiac single defect. The remaining 23.76% of cases of fetal CHD had multiple heart defects. Among all extracardiac malformations, the central nervous system (CNS) was the most common tissue with extracardiac anomalies associated with CHD, accounting for 22.89% of fetal CHD cases. Chromosomal karyotyping identified trisomy 18 as the most common chromosomal abnormality in fetal CHD. We also documented that CHD-containing syndromes could be identified with a comprehensive approach integrating prenatal ultrasound, MRI, pathological autopsy, and cytogenetics and molecular genetics.

Conclusion

Implementation of prenatal echocardiography as a practically feasible platform to screen fetal CHD will reduce the financial and emotional burden of CHD, which may facilitate intrauterine and neonatal intervention of CHD.

Background

Congenital heart defects (CHDs), which result from incomplete or abnormal development of the fetal heart during the early stage of pregnancy, are the most common type of birth defect (https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/index.html), affecting 8 to 12 per 1,000 liveborn infants and accounting for nearly one-third of all major congenital anomalies worldwide [1, 2]. In the United States, about 40,000 (1%) births per year are affected with CHD (https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/heartdefects/data.html). Several studies of the regional incidence of CHD in China have shown that the incidence of CHDs was similar to that in the global report, [2,3,4,5] except that the incidence could be as high as 38.1 per 1,000 live births in the ethnic minority of “Uygur” at Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region (AR), which is geographically adjacent to Russia [6]. CHDs may result from genetic deficits; however, unexplained CHDs could occur secondarily to noncoding genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors, among others [7,8,9]. Such environmental factors include abnormal development and dysfunction of the placenta in pathological pregnancies of intrauterine growth retardation, preterm birth, stillbirth, and preeclampsia [10,11,12,13,14]. Application of transabdominal echocardiography ultrasonographic screening to evaluate for CHDs in clinical practice has increased the detection rate of CHDs [15, 16]. Because of its ability to detect CHDs non-invasively in the early stage of pregnancy, prenatal ultrasound screening has been implemented, along with prenatal hemodynamic screening, as a routine clinical procedure in prenatal healthcare management worldwide [17].

Prenatal screening for CHDs, along with birth defects, has been implemented in China, along with the implementation of a surveillance system for public healthcare and prenatal healthcare [18]. Thousands of prenatal ultrasound specialists have been trained in the nationally credentialed training centers and have been certified for qualification to conduct prenatal ultrasound screening, which ensures that a standardized procedure is applied in the multicenter practices. However, detailed information about the true incidence and disease spectrum of CHDs throughout China is lacking. Therefore, most reports of the incidence/ prevalence and disease spectrum of CHDs in China identified from newborns before 2015 ignored fetuses with CHD that were aborted. In this first Chinese national study of the incidence and disease spectrum of CHDs, 18,171 fetal CHDs were identified and documented via fetal echocardiography through prenatal ultrasound screening for CHDs from among 2,452,249 pregnancies.

Methods

Research design and ethics issue

This project was a multi-institutional clinical research investigation by the Chinese Consortium for Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Congenital Heart Defects, with fetal echocardiography to determine the national incidence, distribution, spectrum, and genetic defects of fetal CHD. The procedures and protocols implemented were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committees of Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province. The research studies were coordinated by the Department of Diagnostic Ultrasonography at the Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province. Informed consent was obtained from each pregnant participant. Ultrasound data between the period of January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2013 were collected as part of clinical procedures for prenatal healthcare management.

Implementation of prenatal screening of CHD with standardized procedures

As part of the ongoing national mandatory program to conduct nationwide surveillance for prevention of structural CHDs, the Ministry of Health (MOH)–credentialed National Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Training Center (NPUDTC) initiated a training program in 2006 (Figure S1). A standardized operating procedure (SOP) for fetal echocardiography, following the guidelines of the International Society for Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) (http://www.ISUOG.org) and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) Clinical Standards Committee, [19, 20] was provided to train prenatal ultrasound specialists. These trained specialists were capable of performing fetal ultrasound scan at the mid-trimester—optimally at between 18 and 22 weeks’ gestational age—with ultrasound skills for the four chambers, outflow tract including left ventricular outflow tract and right ventricular outflow tract, and three-vessel trachea views to capture and to recognize all types of CHD. Prenatal ultrasound specialists nationwide who graduated from and were certified by the NPUDTC for prenatal ultrasound screening of fetal CHD participated in this clinical research project among 93 prenatal screening-diagnostic centers (Table S1).

Prenatal screening for CHD

Instruments used for prenatal ultrasound screening in this study included Siemens Acuson Sequoia 512 and S2000 (Siemens Medical Solutions Inc., Mountain View, CA, United States), Voluson 730 Expert and Voluson E8 (GE Healthcare, Kretz Ultrasound, Zipf, Austria), Philips IU 22 (Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA, United States), and Samsung UGEO WS80 (Samsung Medison Co., Ltd., Korea). In each ultrasound screening center, at least one advanced ultrasound system was employed. The final imaging was reviewed and confirmed by two ultrasound experts. The raw data were then transferred from the ultrasound unit directly into an electronic database to avoid generation of any errors via manual data entry. Random audits were performed to verify data reliability and accuracy during data transfer.

Follow-up and confirmation

To verify the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound screening, positive cases determined by echocardiography were verified by postnatal follow-up with (1) clinical visits, (2) ultrasound and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), (3) surgical observation, (4) pathological autopsy of aborted fetus, and (5) genetic studies.

Data collection

Demographic information about pregnancies was collected from hospital administrative records. Software with multiple drop-down menus for the purpose of data collection from multi-centers was developed at the NPUDTC. Interpretations of fetal heart malformations followed the ISUOG and AIUM Clinical Standards Committee guidelines and were coded on the basis of the 10th revision of the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD10) [17, 19,20,21]. CHD cases were grouped as CHDs with intra-cardiac malformation and CHDs with extra-cardiac malformation. The intra-cardiac malformations were further subgrouped into single abnormalities and multi-abnormalities. For multi-abnormalities, if more than one cardiac malformation was observed, the major anomaly was counted into the subgroup.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0 software (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) and Arcgis10.2. An unpaired t-test was used to compare incidence parameters among northern, central, eastern, western, and southern China. Categorical data were compared by using Pearson chi-square analysis. The relationship between incidence parameter and gross domestic product was assessed by simple linear regression analysis. p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

Results/ findings

Incidence of fetal CHD

A total of 18,171 fetuses affected with CHDs were identified from 2,452,249 pregnancies (Table S2) among 92 (67 tertiary, 22 secondary, and three primary) hospitals across 31 provinces/municipalities/ ARs (Table 1a). Collection of reliable data was not successful in the Tibet AR (labeled as Xizang in Fig. 1), due to incomplete prenatal screening. The overall nationwide incidence of fetal CHD, with the lack of the Tibetanese population, was 74·099/10,000 (18,171/ 2,452,249) pregnancies in China. The regional incidences of fetal CHD in the six geographical regions—the southern, central, eastern, southwestern, northern, and northwestern—were 76·47 (CI: 73·83–79·15), 78·39 (CI: 76·80–80·00), 76·47 (CI: 73·83–79·15), 75·62 (CI: 72·25–79·07), 56·18 (CI: 53·37–59·06), and 47·16 (CI: 43·41–51·08) per 10,000 pregnancies. The incidences of fetal CHD in the ocean coast provinces, including the regions in the south and east, and the province of Shandong but not the province of Fujian or Zhejiang, were relatively higher than those in inland areas (Fig. 1). In the non–ocean coast region, the incidence of CHD was below 9·0 per 1,000 pregnancies in all provinces except Shanxi, which has the highest rate of neuronal tube defects (NTDs) in China and in the world. [22].

Table 1a National incidence of variant subtypes of congenital heart defects in China during 2011–2013 (CI 95%)
Fig. 1
figure 1

Incidence of fetal CHD identified by prenatal echocardiography, and distribution across China. Six regions, the north, central, east, south, northwest, and southwest, presented with dark blue, violet, yellow, red, light green, and dark green, respectively. Data from prenatal ultrasound screening for fetal CHD cases that were collected from Tibet were not available during quality control. No prenatal ultrasound screening data were collected from Taiwan

Distribution of CHD

Subtypes of CHD in the major and minor anomalies and their presence in tertiary hospitals vs. in primary and secondary hospitals were documented (Table 1a). Overall, ventricular septal defect (VSD) was the most common fetal CHD, accounting for 17·04% of pregnancies screened nationwide. Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF), the most common anomaly in the major defect of fetal CHD, was the second most common after VSD, accounting for 9·72% of pregnancies. Following VSD and TOF, the incidences of CHD were atrioventricular septal defect (AVSD) (7·29%), double-outlet right ventricle (DORV) (5·09%), persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC) (4·23%), transposition of the great artery (TGA) (3·82%), single ventricle (SV) (3·19%), hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS) (2·83%), coarctation of the aortic arch/interrupted aortic arch (COA/IAA) (2·72%), and persistent truncus arteriosus (PTA) (2·71%). These CHDs comprised the top-10 most common fetal CHDs (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Subtypes of fetal CHD and their proportionsf in six regions and nation-wide. VSD was determined to be the most common subtype of fetal CHD, followed by TOF as the second most common subtype. AS, aortic stenosis. AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect. COA/IAA, coarctation of the aortic arch/interrupted aortic arch. CVR, congenital vascular ring. DORV, double-outlet rightventricle. EA, Ebstein's anomaly. HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome. HRHS, hypoplastic right heart syndrome. HS, heterotaxy syndrome. PA, pulmonary atresia. PLSVC, persistent left superior vena cava. PS, pulmonary stenosis. PTA, persistent truncus arteriosus. RAA, right aortic arch. SV, single ventricle. TGA, transposition of the great arteries. TOF, tetralogy of Fallot. VSD, ventricular septal defect

Spectrum of all anomalies of CHD

The spectrum of CHD cases in China was determined to comprise 15 major and 21 minor anomalies (Table 1b). Among the 18,171 fetal CHD cases, 14,096 (76·24%) were isolated single defects within the heart, the top 5 most common of which were VSD (29·09%), TOF (14·43%), AVSD (10·24), PLSVC (7·36%), and TGA (4·51%). The remaining 4,075 (23·76%) cases had multiple heart defects, the top 5 most common of which were DORV (18·58%), SV (12·29%), COA/IAA (10·77%), TOF (8·59%), and AVSD (8·44%).

Table 1b Spectrum and proportion of congenital heart defect subtypes

Rare anomaly of fetal CHD

In this study, we defined rare anomalies (RAs) as CHDs whose frequency is less than 1%, as presented in Table 1b. Among all fetal CHDs, 17 subtypes, including five subtypes of fetal CHD—total anomalous pulmonary venous drainage (0·44%), double-outlet left ventricle (DOLV) (0·18%), aortic atresia (AA) (0·14%), aortopulmonary window (0·13%), and ectopia cordis (0·13%)—among major anomalies, and 11 minor anomalies—Ebstein’s anomaly (0·69%), tricuspid atresia (TA) (0·22%), mitral valve stenosis (0·18%), coronary artery fistula (CAF) (0·13%), conjoined twins with one heart (CTOH) (0·09%), mitral atresia (MA) (0·08%), cor triatriatum (CT) (0·07%), ventricular aneurysm (VA) (0·06%), endocardial fibroelastosis (EFE) (0·06%), premature closure of the ductus arteriosus (PCDA) (0·04%), and cardiac diverticulum (CD) (0·02%)—were RAs. These RAs account for 3·44% (1·78% major anomalies and 1·66% minor anomalies) of CHD cases. Furthermore, seven subtypes (CTOH, MA, CT, VA, EFE, PCDA, and CD) whose frequencies were less than 0·1% may be classified as very rare anomalies (vRAs).

Fetal CHD accompanied with extracardiac defects

A total of 5,338 cases of fetal CHD were found to be accompanied by extracardiac malformation(s) and were labeled as extracardiac congenital heart defects (xCHDs). Sixteen subtypes of fetal CHD were identified and correlated with extracardiac malformations (Table 2). VSD was the most common xCHD, accounting for 30% (1,578/5,338) of total xCHDs. AVSD, TOF, and DORV were the next three most common xCHDs, accounting for 13·23% (706/5,338), 12·20% (651/5,338), and 12·14% (648/5,338), respectively. VSD accompanied with central nervous system (CNS) malformation was the most common complex birth defect involved in xCHD, as shown in Fig. 3, accounting for 8% of fetal CHD cases with xCHD (427/5,338). Among all extracardiac malformations, the CNS was the most common organ/tissue to accompany xCHD, accounting for 22·89% (1,222/5,338) of xCHD cases.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Extracardiac abnormalities associated with fetal intracardiac anomaly. The CNS was determined to be the most common extracardiac tissue that accompanies fetal CHD. AS, aortic stenosis. AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect. COA/IAA, coarctation of the aortic arch/interrupted aortic arch. DORV, double-outlet right ventricle. HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome. HRHS, hypoplastic right heart syndrome. HS, heterotaxy syndrome. LSVC, left superior vena cava. PA, pulmonary atresia. PTA, persistent truncus arteriosus. PS, pulmonary stenosis. SV, single ventricle. TGA, transposition of the great arteries. TOF, tetralogy of Fallot. VR, vascular ring. VSD, ventricular septal defect

Table 2 Extracardiac defects associated with congenital heart defects

Genetic study of chromosomal abnormalities with karyotyping and microarray

Genetic study for chromosomal abnormality was performed among 566 cases of fetal CHD, 487 of which were analyzed by karyotyping, and 79 by microarray to determine chromosomal copy number variations (CNVs) including DNA fragment deletion and/or repetition/ duplication or uniparental disomy (UPD). As presented in Fig. 4; Table 3, the most common chromosomal abnormality in CHD is trisomy 18 (159/487, 32·65%), followed by trisomy 21 (138/487, 28·34%). When microarray was applied to identify chromosomal segment abnormalities (Table 4), 78·48% (62/79) of cases were found to carry pathogenic microdeletion, microrepetition/microduplication, UPD, or large-segment deletion or repetition. Twenty-two cases were the result of microdeletion, and three of microduplication of chromosome 22q. Twenty-five (of 62) CNVs, including seven in VSD, two in DORV, three in TOF, one each in AS, COA/IAA, hypoplastic right heart syndrome (HRHS), PLSVC, and PTA as well as six in complex CHDs involved in the chromosomal region 22q11 and two (HRHS, TOF) in 22q13, accounted for 40·32% of pathogenic CNVs. The remaining 17 CNVs were considered suspected pathogenic alleles, in which chromosomal deletion 16p11-12 was the predominant abnormality, accounting for 29·41% (5/17) of CNVs.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Karyotyping of fetal CHD. Trisomy 18 was identified as the most common chromosomal abnormality in fetal CHD, followed by trisomy 21. AA, aortic atresia. ADV, . AS, aortic stenosis. ASD, atrial septal defect. CVR, congenital vascular ring. DORV, double-outlet right ventricle. ECD, endsystolic dimension. HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome. HRHS, hypoplastic right heart syndrome. HS, heterotaxy syndrome. IAA, interrupted aortic arch. MA, mitral atresia. PA, pulmonary atresia. PLSVC, persistent left superior vena cava. PS, pulmonary stenosis. PTA, persistent truncus arteriosus. SV, single ventricle. TGA, transposition of the great arteries. TOF, tetralogy of Fallot. TVD, tricuspid valve disease. VSD, ventricular septal defect

Table 3 Genetic study of Congenital heart defects: Karyotyping of chromosomal anomalies among congenital heart defect subtypes
Table 4 Genetic study of congenital heart defects: Copy number variations of CHD

Termination of pregnancy as a consequence of prenatal screening of CHD

Among 12,441 CHD cases for which data were available, 60·69% (7,551/12,441) pregnancies were confirmed to have been selectively terminated. Of these aborted fetuses, 6,857 underwent postnatal pathological autopsy, which characterized 2,277 (33·21%) with intracardiac simple CHDs, 2,084 (30·39%) with intracardiac complex CHDs, and 2,308 (33·66%) with CHDs with extracardiac malformation(s), and 188 cases (2·74%) were independently identified as carrying chromosomal abnormalities. TOF was the most common CHD among the aborted fetuses, followed in descending order by AVSD, DORV, VSD, TGA, SV, PTA, HLHS, COA/IAA, and HRHS, as shown in Fig. 5.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparisons of intracardiac anomalies and extracardiac anomalies. It is shown that the most common fetal CHD in each subcategory was: TOF in intracardiac single anomaly (light blue), DORV in intracardiac complex anomaly (yellow), and VSD in extracardiac malformation (green). AVSD, atrioventricular septal defect. COA/IAA, coarctation of the aorticarch/interrupted aortic arch. DORV, double-outlet right ventricle. HLHS, hypoplastic left heart syndrome. HRHS, hypoplastic right heart syndrome. PA, pulmonary atresia. PS, pulmonary stenosis. PTA, persistent truncus arteriosus. SV, single ventricle. TGA, transposition of the great arteries. TOF, tetralogy of Fallot. VSD, ventricular septal defect

Postnatal follow-up to verify the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound screening results

Prenatal ultrasound is a screening, rather than a diagnostic, procedure. In this study, postnatal follow-up was carried out for 20% (3,619) of 18,171 fetal CHD cases, including 1,965 cases by the postnatal diagnostic procedure(s) of clinical visits, imaging (chest X-ray, ultrasound, and/or MRI), and neonatal surgery; and 1,654 cases by pathological autopsy of aborted fetuses (Table 5). Our follow-up results showed 4·70% of cases with 100% agreement between prenatal screening results and postnatal verification, for the CHD subtypes of AA, CAF, dextrocardia, DOLV, ductus arteriosus stenosis, HLHS, HRHS, heterotaxy syndrome, MA, myocardiopathy, pulmonary atresia/VSD, PCDA, patent ductus arteriosus, pulmonary valvular stenosis, TA, tricuspid valve cleft, and tricuspid valve dysplasia. Other than three subtypes—two (aortic valve stenosis and noncompaction of the ventricular myocardium) that were completely misreported and 44 cases of COA/IAA that showed 45.45% agreement—the majority of the prenatal ultrasound results showed more than 60% agreement between prenatal screening results and postnatal follow-up confirmation. Overall, prenatal ultrasound resulted in 88% accuracy.

Table 5 Postnatal follow-up to verify the accuracy of prenatal ultrasound screening

Discussion

Incidence and distribution

Applying prenatal ultrasound screening, we determined that the incidence of CHDs in China during 2011–2013 was 7·4099 per 1,000 (7·4099%) pregnancies. To our knowledge, this is the largest single cohort in the world, with 2,452,249 pregnancies reported so far. The incidence of Chinese fetal CHD cases in the current report is similar to that reported in Western countries (Table S3) [23,24,25,26]. The incidence is higher in advanced, developed regions, such as in the southeastern provinces of Shandong, Jiangsu, and Guangdong, where CHD incidence is ≥ 9% (Fig. 1), and in provinces with a high rate of birth defects, such as 9·8% in Shanxi province [22]. CHD incidence is much lower—below 6%—in the western provinces of Yunnan, Qinghai, Gansu, and Xinjian (Fig. 1). However, the higher incidence in coastal areas vs. the low rate in western developing regions appears not to be correlated with economic development (Figure S2).

Spectrum of CHDs: single vs. complex and intracardiac vs. extracardiac

A total of 36 subtypes of fetal CHD, including 15 major and 21 minor abnormalities, have been reported in this study. To our knowledge, this is the most complete collection of fetal CHD cases among Chinese populations. We determined that the most common single intracardiac anomaly was VSD, followed by TOF, AVSD, PLSVC, and TGA. Among the intracardiac multi-anomalies, DORV was the most common, followed by SV, COA/IAA, TOF, and AVSD. We also documented that the CNS was found to be the most commonly involved extracardiac tissue, accounting for 20·89% of extracardiac defects, followed by the urogenital (15·21%), craniofacial (13·52%), digestive (8·60%), and skeletal (7·99%) systems. Fetal appendage malformations (21·04%), fetal hydrops (8·29%), and fetal abdominal-wall defects (4·45%) were also found to occur commonly with intracardiac anomaly.

Genetics and genomics: Cytogenetics vs. molecular genetics

It has long been known that CHDs may result from chromosomal abnormalities. CHD in Down syndrome (DS, trisomy 21) and in DiGeorge syndrome, characterized by microdeletion of the DiGeorge critical region at 22q11.21, represents two traditional conditions [7, 8]. DS is by far the most common and the best-known disorder resulting from chromosomal aneuploidy and the most common cause of intellectual disability. CHD is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity during the first two years of life in the DS population [27]. DiGeorge syndrome is caused by the deletion of a small segment of chromosome 22 [28]. Advanced genetic studies have identified about 400 genes implicated in CHDs, encompassing transcription factors, cell signaling molecules, and structural proteins that are important for heart development [29]. In our study, we initiated chromosomal karyotyping to determine the aneuploidy, followed by microarray assay for CNVs (Tables 3 and 4), to identify chromosomal abnormalities among the fetal CHD cases identified through prenatal echocardiography. In this study, four cases of TOF showed micro-deletion at 22q11.21, which is characteristic of DiGeorge syndrome. Micro-deletion at this DiGeorge’s locus was also the most common abnormality in 53·84% of VSD cases. Genome-wide association study (GWS) was also performed, as presented in Fig. 6. One case was CHARGE syndrome, which was originally screened as AVSD with prenatal fetal echocardiography, diagnosed with MRI, confirmed by autopsy, and studied with GWS, which identified a c.6482del at gene CHD7 that produced a mutant peptide. The second example was a point mutation, c.309 C > A, at gene LZTR1, identified from a case of fetal TOF and determined to be Noonan syndrome.

Fig. 6
figure 6

Comprehensive study of CHD. Prenatally identified CHD by fetal echocardiography (a1, b1, c1) was confirmed with MRI (b2, c2), pathological autopsy (a3, b3, c3), and genetic studies of microarray that showed microdeletion (a2) or genome wide sequencing (not shown). Three cases are presented to demonstrate the prenatally fetal-echocardiography-screening were verified and confirmed with MRI, autopsy, and genetic/genomic approach. Case 1 (a): DiGeorge syndrome was observed with DORV by prenatal ultrasound (a1) and verified in pathological autopsy (a3). Genetic study with a microarray (a2) determined a microdeletion of 2,825,77Kb at chromosome 22q11.21 between 22.18920346-21746118, which fell into the DiGeorge critical region (DGCR) that embeds 69 genes. Case 2 (b); CHARGE syndrome was observed with AVSD by prenatal ultrasound (b1) and verified in pathological autopsy (a3). Genetic study with a microarray (a2), confirmed by a 7T MRI (as pointed by arrow in b2), verified by a single nucleotide deletion c.6482del at gene CHD7 (NM_017780.3), which resulted in a frameshift mutation p.His2161Leufs54 and produced a mutant C-terminal peptide of CHD7 protein. Case 3 (c): Noonan syndrome (type X) was identified with a TOF presented by VSD, PA, and ARCH in the echocardiography (c1), which was confirmed by a 7T MRI (c2) and pathological autopsy (c3). GWS determined a single nucleotide mutation c.309C>A at gene LZTR1 (NM_006767.3), resulting in a nonsense mutation of p.Cyc103* that truncated C-terminus of LZTR1 protein

Clinical application and data reliability

The overall 88% agreement in this study between prenatal ultrasound results and the follow-up confirmation (Table 5) demonstrates the feasibility and capability of performing a nation-wide study with a standardized procedure. Our experience is that system-wide training in general prenatal ultrasound skills and knowledge with on-site initiation of prenatal ultrasound screening to recognize fetal cardiac anomalies is critical for success. Whether the affected fetus is born or is terminated, postnatal follow-up may determine the accuracy of screening outcome, especially at early stages. This follow-up may help in implementation of prenatal screening for CHD in under-developed regions. In developed areas, we encourage clinicians to consider the comprehensive approach to confirmation of results from prenatal screening for CHD, integrating prenatal ultrasound, MRI, pathological autopsy, postnatal cardiac ultrasound or imaging, and genetic studies (Fig. 6), to better understand the molecular pathogenesis of CHD. With this approach, we will be able to explore and implement early intervention to prevent fetal CHD and to reduce the global burden of treatment for CHDs.

Abbreviations

AA:

aortic atresia

APW:

aortopulmonary window

AVSD:

atrioventricular septal defect

CAF:

coronary artery fistula

CD:

cardiac diverticulum

COA/IAA:

coarctation of the aortic arch/interrupted aortic arch

CT:

cor triatriatum

DOLV:

double-outlet left ventricle

DORV:

double-outlet right ventricle

EA:

Ebstein’s anomaly

EC:

ectopia cordis

EFE:

endocardial fibroelastosis

HLHS:

hypoplastic left heart syndrome

HRHS:

hypoplastic right heart syndrome

MA:

mitral atresia

PCDA:

premature closure of the ductus arteriosus

PLSVC:

persistent left superior vena cava

PTA:

persistent truncus arteriosus

SV:

single ventricle

TA:

tricuspid atresia

TBS:

Taussig Bing syndrome

TGA:

transposition of the great artery

TOF:

tetralogy of Fallot

VA:

ventricular aneurysm

VSD:

ventricular septal defect

References

  1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S. The incidence of congenital Heart Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1890–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu W, He J, Shao X. Incidence and mortality trend of congenital Heart Disease at the global, regional, and national level, 1990–2017. Med (Baltim). 2020;99:e20593. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang XY, Li XF, Lü XD, Liu YL. Incidence of congenital Heart Disease in Beijing, China. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009;122:1128–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhao QM, Ma XJ, Jia B, Huang GY. Prevalence of congenital Heart Disease at live birth: an accurate assessment by echocardiographic screening. Acta Paediatr. 2013;102:397–402. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.12170.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhao QM, Liu F, Wu L, Ma XJ, Niu C, Huang GY. Prevalence of congenital Heart Disease at live birth in China. J Pediatr. 2019;204:53–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.08.040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liu F, Yang YN, Xie X, et al. Prevalence of congenital Heart Disease in Xinjiang multi-ethnic region of China. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133961.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zaidi S, Brueckner M. Genetics and genomics of congenital Heart Disease. Circ Res. 2017;120:923–40. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.309140.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Thomford NE, Dzobo K, Yao NA, et al. Genomics and epigenomics of congenital heart defects: Expert review and lessons learned in Africa. OMICS. 2018;22:301–21. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2018.0033.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosa-Garrido M, Chapski DJ, Vondriska TM. Epigenomes in Cardiovascular Disease. Circ Res. 2018;122:1586–607. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.311597.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Courtney JA, Cnota JF, Jones HN. The role of abnormal placentation in congenital Heart Disease; cause, correlate, or consequence? Front Physiol. 2018;9:1045. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01045.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Puri K, Warshak CR, Habli MA, et al. Fetal somatic growth trajectory differs by type of congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Res. 2017;83:669–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/pr.2017.275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Laas E, Lelong N, Thieulin AC, et al. Preterm birth and congenital heart defects: a population-based study. Pediatrics. 2012;130:e829–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jorgensen M, McPherson E, Zaleski C, Shivaram P, Cold C. Stillbirth: the heart of the matter. Am J Med Genet A. 2014;164A:691–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.36366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Auger N, Fraser WD, Healy-Profitos J, Arbour L. Association between preeclampsia and congenital heart defects. JAMA. 2015;314:1588–98. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.12505.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Russo MG, Paladini D, Pacileo G, et al. Changing spectrum and outcome of 705 fetal congenital Heart Disease cases: 12 years, experience in a third-level center. J Cardiovasc Med. 2008;9:910–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaasen A, Tuveng J, Heiberg A, Scott H, Haugen G. Correlation between prenatal ultrasound and autopsy findings: a study of second-trimester abortions. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006;28:925–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3871.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Carvalho JS, Allan LD, et al. ISUOG Practice guidelines (updated): Sonographic screening examination of the fetal heart. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41:348–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.12403.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Y, Riehle-Colarusso T, Correa A, et al. Observed prevalence of congenital heart defects from a surveillance study in China. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:989–95. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.7.989.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lees CC, Stampalija T, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice guidelines: diagnosis and management of small-for-gestational-age fetus and fetal growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56:298–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22134.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Fetal Echocardiography Task Force; American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine Clinical Standards Committee; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. AIUM practice guideline for the performance of fetal echocardiography. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:127–36. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hedegaard H, Johnson RL. An Updated International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) Surveillance Case Definition for Injury hospitalizations. Natl Health Stat Report. 2019;125:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li Z, Ren A, Zhang L, et al. Extremely high prevalence of neural tube defects in a 4-county area in Shanxi Province, China. Birth Defects Res a Clin Mol Teratol. 2006;76:237–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20248.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, Mahle WT, Correa A. Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998–2005. J Pediatr. 2008;153:807–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.05.059.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fesslova V, Nava S, Villa L. Evolution and long-term outcome in cases with fetal diagnosis of congenital Heart Disease: Italian multicentre study. Fetal Cardiol Study Group Italian Soc Pediatr Cardiol. 1999;82:594–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Allan LD, Sharland GK, Milburn A, et al. Prospective diagnosis of 1,006 consecutive cases of congenital Heart Disease in the fetus. J Am College Cardiol. 1994;23:1452–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Tennstedt C, et al. Spectrum of congenital heart defects and extracardiac malformations associated with chromosomal abnormalities: results of a seven year necropsy study. Heart. 1999;82:34–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Levenson D. Talking about Down syndrome. Am J Med Genet A. 2009;149A:vii–viii. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32867.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. DiGeorge AM. Discussions on a new concept of the cellular basis of immunity. J Pediatr. 1965;67:907.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Williams K, Carson J, Lo C. Genetics of congenital Heart Disease. Biomolecules. 2019;9:879. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9120879.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by the Key Project of Science and Technology Planning Project of Hubei Province (2010CDA038), the Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation (2012FFB01203), the Key Project of Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation (2011CDA012 and 2014CFA062), and the Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene (914–3280, 914–3257).

Funding

This study was supported in part by the Key Project of Science and Technology Planning Project of Hubei Province (2010CDA038), the Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation (2012FFB01203), the Key Project of Hubei Province Natural Science Foundation (2011CDA012 and 2014CFA062), and the New York State Research Foundation for Mental Hygiene (914–3280, 914–3257).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

XC and NZ conceived and designed the research studies. XC, YlG, SZ, PC, YdG, QF, XZ, HH, XhL, XY, FY, CC, XsL, and the participants from the Chinese Consortium for Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Congenital Heart Defects (CCPUSCHD) listed in Table S1 performed prenatal ultrasound screening, data collection, and postnatal confirmation. JL coordinated the CCPUSCHD. JL and NZ independently performed data analyses. XC, XD, WJ, and NZ. initiated manuscript drafting, and NZ finalized the manuscript and submitted it on behalf of the CCPUSCHD.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Longxian Cheng or Nanbert Zhong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have declared that there are no financial conflicts or conflicts of interest with other individuals or organizations.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Members of the Chinese Consortium for Prenatal Ultrasound Screening of Congenital Heart Defects are listed in Table S1.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Zhao, S., Dong, X. et al. Incidence, distribution, disease spectrum, and genetic deficits of congenital heart defects in China: implementation of prenatal ultrasound screening identified 18,171 affected fetuses from 2,452,249 pregnancies. Cell Biosci 13, 229 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-023-01172-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-023-01172-7

Keywords