Skip to main content
Fig. 5 | Cell & Bioscience

Fig. 5

From: Unraveling the 2,3-diketo-l-gulonicĀ acid-dependent and -independent impacts of l-ascorbic acid on somatic cell reprogramming

Fig. 5

Metabolome analysis suggests the abilities of DKG to regulate TCA cycle. A MEFs were treated with 160Ā Ī¼M AscPNa, DHAA, or DKG for three days, and their metabolome profiles were analyzed using 6546 LC/Q-TOF. PCA was performed with the obtained results to visualize the differences in metabolite regulation among the treatments. Bā€“C Volcano plot showing the compounds regulated by DKG compared to the control B. Changes in these compounds by DHAA and AscPNa treatments were summarized C. D The abilities of AscPNa, DHAA, and DKG to regulate canonical TCA cycle were analyzed. E Inhibition of canonical TCA cycle resulted in an increase in succinate, fumarate, and malate, while Ī±-KG levels decreased. Fā€“G The effects of 160Ā Ī¼M AscPNa, DHAA, and DKG on ECAR and OCR were determined using the Seahorse instrument. Hā€“K During reprogramming, MEFs were treated with 160Ā Ī¼M AscPNa, DHAA, or DKG. The concentrations of succinate H and Ī±-KG I, glycolysis J, and ATP production through oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS)Ā K were determined on day 3. Metabolome analysis was performed at least eight times (nā€‰ā‰„ā€‰8), while other experiments were repeated at least five times (nā€‰ā‰„ā€‰5). Additional statistical information is listed in Additional file 4: Table S3. For related information, see also Additional file 1: Figure S3

Back to article page