Skip to main content

Table 5 List of promising modern isolation and separation techniques for MSC-EVs [114]

From: Heterogeneity of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles is highly impacted by the tissue/cell source and culture conditions

Technique

Separation system

Advantages

Purity

Sample volume

Size-exclusion chromatography (SEC)

IZON® qEV column

Removal of co-contaminants including HDLs, albumin

Yield better functionality of EVs compared to UC

Less compositional and structural alterations comparted to precipitation techniques

 +  +  + 

100 µl—10 ml

Sepharose® CL-4B

 +  +  + 

1 – 10 ml

Filtration-based

Centrifugal filter unit

Defined MWCO ranging from 10 – 100 kDa

Simple and easy handling

Cost- and time-effective

 + 

Up to 10 ml

Tangential Flow Filtration (TFF)

Higher concentration of EVs

 + 

 > 10 ml

Hydrostatic filtration dialysis (HFD)

No centrifugation step

Low EV loss

 + 

 > 10 ml

Flow field-flow fractionation

asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation (AsFlFFF or AF4)

Cross-flow can be modified

Optimization between runs possible to enhance separation efficiency

More flexible compared to sec

Gentle fractionation

 +  + 

 > 10 ml

Deterministic lateral displacement (DLD) pillar array

Enables separation of exosomes in the size range of 20 to 110 nm

 +  + 

 > 10 ml

Charge-based

Anion-exchange chromatography (AIEC)

Shorter isolation time (< 3 h for 1 L of cell culture supernatant)

Yield intact evs

 +  + 

Up to 1L

Electrophoresis and dielectrophoresis (DEP)

Subpopulations separated based on electrophoretic mobilities acquire information on properties of charged and non-charged EVs

 +  + 

 > 10 ml

Affinity-based

Magnetic beads

Highly selective and specific

Isolate evs originating from different cell types

 +  +  + 

100 µl–1 ml