Skip to main content

Table 1 Association between RRM2 expression and clinicopathologic characteristics (logistic regression)

From: RRM2 silencing suppresses malignant phenotype and enhances radiosensitivity via activating cGAS/STING signaling pathway in lung adenocarcinoma

Clinical characteristics

Total (N)

Odds ratio (OR) in RRM2 expression

p-value

Age

494

  

 ≤ 65 vs. > 65

 

0.7464644 (0.5234463–1.06287)

0.1053727

Gender

513

  

 Male vs. Female

 

1.357798 (0.9591132–1.925223)

0.08510176

Stage

505

  

 II vs. I

 

1.55754 (1.014021–2.399717)

0.04346904*

 III vs. I

 

2.180556 (1.327597–3.627003)

0.002300152**

 IV vs. I

 

3.019231 (1.30853–7.578007)

0.01244337*

T

510

  

 T2 vs. T1

 

1.959701 (1.329787–2.902402)

0.0007191007***

 T3 vs. T1

 

1.326567 (0.6885868–2.545255)

0.3947867

 T4 vs. T1

 

1.674959 (0.6424348–4.427256)

0.2882927

N

501

  

 N2 vs. N1

 

1.75431 (1.108522–2.796568)

0.0170222*

 N3 vs. N1

 

2.50069 (1.487095–4.295968)

0.0006760279***

 N4 vs. N1

 

1.275862 (0.05016816–32.44753)

0.8636424

M

369

  

 M1 vs. M0

 

2.252246 (0.9743585–5.647803)

0.06628612