Skip to main content

Table 1 The basic properties and features of enzymatic tags developed for enzyme-catalyzed proximity labeling approaches based on APEX and BioID

From: In vivo interactome profiling by enzyme‐catalyzed proximity labeling

Enzyme

Enzyme activity

Year

Size (kDa)

Source

Mutations

Features

APEX

Ascorbate peroxidase

2012

28

Pea

K14D, W41F, E112K

applicability for high-resolution EM tagging of mammalian organelles and specific proteins [36]

APEX2

Ascorbate peroxidase

2015

28

Soybean

K14D, W41F, E112K, A134P

more sensitive and active in cells than APEX for both protein imaging by EM and proteomic mapping[35]; APEX-seq for subcellular RNA detection [19]

BioID

Biotin ligase

2012

35

E. coli

BirA-R118G

introduced as a useful screening tool for interacting and neighboring proteins in native cellular environment [9]

BioID2

Biotin ligase

2016

27

A. aeolicus

R40G

functionally comparable to BioID, but with more-selective targeting, less biotin supplementation requirement, and enhanced labeling efficiency [45]

BASU

Biotin ligase

2018

28

B. Subtilis

Amino acids 1–65 deleted, R124G, E323S, G325R

faster kinetics, increased signal-to-noise ratio compared to BioID, enables direct detection of RNA-protein interactions [17]

TurboID

Biotin ligase

2018

35

E. coli

Q65P, I87V, R118S, E140K, Q141R, A146Δ, S150G, L151P, V160A, T192A, K194I, M209V, M241T, S263P, I305V

generates detectable biotinylated materials for analysis within minutes; a superior methods for in vivo studies [32]

miniTurbo

Biotin ligase

2018

28

E. coli

Amino acids 1–63 deleted, Q65P, I87V, R118S, E140K, Q141R, A146Δ, S150G, L151P, V160A, T192A, K194I, M209V, I305V

suggested to be less stable than TurboID, but with reduced interference with trafficking and function of fusion protein; preferable when a precisely defined labeling time is the priority [32]