| BW (g) | HR (bpm) | Ves (LII) | Ved (LII) | Pes (mmHg) | Ped (mmHg) | SV (Lll) | EF (%) | dP/dt (mmHg/s) | −dP/dt (−mm Hg/s) |
---|
Con | 23.1 ± 3.0 | 339 ± 32 | 14.8 ± 2.3 | 22.2 ± 1.2 | 79.2 ± 5.6 | 7.0 ± 2.7 | 10.2 ± 1.7 | 48.3 ± 8.4 | 4452 ± 924 | 3998 ± 858 |
KO | 21.3 ± 1.8 | 271 ± 11 | 12.5 ± 2.0 | 17.8 ± 2.4 | 75.3 ± 1.8 | 6.5 ± 1.4 | 7.9 ± 1.1 | 44.4 ± 5.9 | 3732 ± 385 | 3092 ± 444 |
- Hemodynamic function of p85-KO and the Cre controls (12 week-old, male) were measured by cardiac catheter as described in “Method”. There is no statistical significance between the Con and KO mice
-
BW body weight; HR heart rate; Ves end systolic volume; Ved end diastolic volume; Pes end systolic pressure; Ped end diastolic pressure; SV stroke volume; EF ejection fraction; +dP/dt the rate of pressure development; −dP/dt the rate of relaxation. Con n=4; KO n=7