Buccal injection of synthetic HPV long peptide vaccine induces local and systemic antigen-specific CD8+ T-cell immune responses and antitumor effects without adjuvant
© Yang et al. 2016
Received: 9 October 2015
Accepted: 15 February 2016
Published: 3 March 2016
Human Papillomavirus is responsible for over 99 % of cervical cancers and is associated with cancers of the head and neck. The currently available prophylactic vaccines against HPV do not generate therapeutic effects against established HPV infections and associated lesions and disease. Thus, the need for a therapeutic vaccine capable of treating HPV-induced malignancies persists. Synthetic long peptides vaccination is a popular antigen delivery method because of its safety, stability, production feasibility, and its need to be processed by professional antigen presenting cells before it can be presented to cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes. Cancers in the buccal mucosa have been shown to elicit cancer-related inflammations that are capable of recruiting inflammatory and immune cells to generate antitumor effects. In the current study, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of synthetic HPV long peptide vaccination in the absence of adjuvant in the TC-1 buccal tumor model.
We show that intratumoral vaccination with E7 long peptide alone effectively controls buccal TC-1 tumors in mice. Furthermore, we observed an increase in systemic as well as local E7-specific CD8+ T cells in buccal tumor-bearing mice following the vaccination. Finally, we show that induction of immune responses against buccal tumors by intratumoral E7 long peptide vaccination is independent of CD4+ T cells, and that the phenomenon may be related to the unique environment associated with mucosal tissues.
Our results suggest the possibility for clinical translation of the administration of adjuvant free therapeutic long peptide vaccine as a potentially effective and safe strategy for mucosal HPV-associated tumor treatment.
KeywordsImmunotherapy E7 long peptide Adjuvant free Buccal tumor
It is now clear that human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is responsible for over 99 % of all cervical cancers, and is also associated with many other anogenital malignancies including vaginal and anal cancers . In addition, the prevalence of HPV infection in head and neck cancers increased significantly within the past decade, with approximately 75 % of diagnosed oropharyngeal cancers corresponding with HPV infection . Among all HPV subtypes, the high-risk oncogenic HPV subtypes, predominantly HPV type 16, are responsible for the majority of HPV associated cancer [3, 4]. The known etiology of HPV-associated diseases provides an excellent opportunity to develop vaccines against the high-risk HPV types. Encouragingly, there have been several successes in the development of prophylactic vaccines against disease-causing HPV subtypes . However, these prophylactic vaccines can only prevent infections and do not generate therapeutic effects against established HPV infections and HPV-associated lesions . Thus, the urgent need for the development of a therapeutic vaccine capable of treating HPV-induced malignancies persists.
To date, several clinical trials have been conducted using HPV-16 encoded oncoproteins E6 and E7 as targets of immunotherapy to treat HPV-induced cancers [7–10]. Among different therapeutic vaccine designs, peptide-based vaccines containing minimal epitopes of oncoproteins E6 and E7 have been popular and promising due to their safety, stability, and production feasibility [9, 11–13]. However, some limitations to peptide vaccines dampen their application efficacy. Importantly, short peptides may be directly loaded onto any MHC I molecules on the surface of cells, including those that are not professional antigen presenting cells (APCs). This may result in interaction between T-cell receptor and MHC I—antigen peptide complex in the absence of co-stimulation, causing T-cell anergy and immune tolerance . To overcome this issue and increase the efficacy of the peptide vaccine, the length of the peptide antigen has been increased [14, 15]. The synthetic long peptides are too large for the direct loading onto MHC I molecules on the surface of cells, thus requiring the peptide to be taken up and processed before the epitope can be presented on MHC I molecules, which is a process unique to the professional APCs. The professional APCs, such as the dendritic cells (DCs), can also provide the co-stimulatory signals during antigen presentation, ensuring quality T cell activation [16, 17].
Despite the improved antigen presentation process of the synthetic long peptide vaccine, the issue of poor immunogenicity remains. Typically, additional adjuvant or immunostimulant is required to induce the desired immune responses for vaccines incorporating synthetic peptides of a target antigen . It is well known that malignant tumors, including squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck, are strongly associated with local inflammation [18, 19]. These cancer-related inflammations trigger the release of cytokines and the recruitment of inflammatory and immune cells, which could lead to the induction of either immune suppression or anti-tumor immunity [20, 21]. Thus, the inflammatory nature of cancer may potentially serves as self-adjuvant capable of inducing the antigen-specific immune responses following synthetic long peptide vaccination.
In the current study, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of a synthetic HPV long peptide vaccine in the absence of adjuvant in the TC-1 buccal tumor model. We showed that intratumoral (I.T.) vaccination with HPV-16 E7aa 43-62 synthetic long peptide lead to enhanced antitumor effect in buccal tumor-bearing mice in the absence of adjuvant administration. Furthermore, we observed an increase in the number of E7-specific CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood, spleen, and the buccal mucosa tissue. We also observed that the antitumor effect of the synthetic long peptide vaccination is CD8+ T cells dependent and CD4+ T cells independent. We also showed that in comparison to subcutaneous tumor model, intratumoral synthetic long peptide vaccination in the absence of adjuvant lead to the generation of superior E7-specific CD8+ T cell response as well as more potent therapeutic antitumor effects against tumors located in the buccal mucosal region. Finally, we demonstrated that the observed therapeutic effects generated by intratumoral E7 long peptide vaccination in the buccal area are abolished upon deletion of toll-like receptor 4. Our results indicate that adjuvant free therapeutic long peptide vaccination is an effective and safe therapeutic strategy for treating tumors located in the mucosa.
Intratumoral administration of synthetic HPV long peptide vaccine in the buccal area generates potent antitumor responses
Intratumoral administration of synthetic HPV long peptide vaccine in the buccal area leads to generation of systemic and local E7-specific CD8+ T cell responses
The synthetic HPV long peptide vaccine generates potent antitumor effects against HPV-16 E7 expressing tumors in CD4-depleted mice but not in CD8-depleted mice
Intratumoral administration of synthetic HPV long peptide vaccine leads to better generation of E7-specific CD8+ T cells and more potent antitumor effects against buccal mucosal tumor compared to subcutaneous tumor
Knocking out toll-like receptor 4 abolishes the therapeutic effect of intratumoral synthetic HPV long peptide vaccination
In the current study, we examined the effects of adjuvant free, I.T. synthetic E7 long peptide vaccination on the generation of antigen-specific immune responses and antitumor effects. We observed that following I.T. synthetic E7 long peptide vaccination, the buccal tumor-bearing mice exhibited significant increase in systemic and local E7-specific CD8+ T cells, effectively controlling the tumor growth. In addition, we found that the antitumor effects generated by E7 long peptide vaccine is predominantly mediated by the CD8+ T cells and not by CD4+ T cells. Finally, we show that I.T. synthetic E7 long peptide vaccination without adjuvant elicited a better E7-specific CD8+ T cell response and more potent antitumor effects against tumors located in the buccal mucosa than to tumors located in the subcutaneous abdomen.
Of note, we demonstrated a difference in the ability of E7 long peptide vaccine in generating potent antigen-specific immune responses and antitumor effects when vaccinated I.T. against buccal tumors compared to when vaccinated I.T. against subcutaneous tumors (Figs. 4 and 5). This observation is supported by previous data. We have previously explored the employment of a sulfated polysaccharide compound from red algae, carrageenan, as adjuvant to generate antigen-specific immune responses and antitumor effects following subcutaneous E7 peptide vaccination . The experiment demonstrated that subcutaneous E7 peptide vaccination alone without carrageenan administration did not lead to generation and activation of E7-specific CD8+ T cell immune response, which correspond to limited protective and therapeutic antitumor effects. In a separate study, we explored the adjuvant effect of chemotherapy in eliciting antigen-specific antitumor response and showed that I.T. vaccination of E7 peptide without cisplatin administration did not lead to effective control of subcutaneous tumors or the generation of potent E7-specific immune responses . We explored the potential reasons for the phenomena observed in these previous studies, and showed that there was significantly less CD11c+ DCs accumulation in tumor as well as DCs migration to the lymph nodes when vaccinated I.T. with E7 peptide only without administration of adjuvant [22, 23]. Furthermore, DCs isolated from mice treated with E7 peptide vaccine alone express significantly less costimulatory molecules compared to those isolated from mice treated with both peptide vaccination and adjuvant administration, which translates into a lower ability to activate E7-specific CD8+ T cells. In contrast, a previous study has shown that buccal immunization with measles virus nucleoprotein (NP) alone is capable of eliciting a NP-specific CD8+ CTL response . Furthermore, the study observed a rapid recruitment of DCs into the buccal mucosa after NP vaccination. In this study, we showed that the innate immune system regulated by TLR4 plays a significant role in eliciting the anti-tumor responses against buccal TC-1 tumor (Fig. 6). The differences in the tissue environment and the ability to recruit APCs to the local area may account for the difference in the generation of immune responses and antitumor effects between I.T. vaccination against buccal tumor versus I.T. vaccination against subcutaneous tumor. The trafficking of immune cells to the tumor location before and after I.T. E7 peptide vaccination in the buccal mucosa or subcutaneous abdomen should be further explored in future studies.
One key finding of the current study is that the experiments involving synthetic E7 long peptide vaccination were conducted without administration of supplementing adjuvants. Many studies have been performed to explore different approaches to elicit potent immune responses and antitumor effects through adjuvant-free vaccination [25–27]. Even though administration of adjuvants can elicit stronger immune responses, many substances with adjuvant effects have also been shown to have negative impact on tumor treatment [28, 29], to cause T cells dysfunction and retention [30, 31], to have neurotoxicity , or to induce autoimmunity . Thus, identifying appropriate adjuvants that are both safe and effective when incorporated into vaccination strategies is a significant concern. Our study suggests the potential utilization of the natural immunogenic characteristics of mucosal tissue to elicit potent antigen-specific immune responses as well as therapeutic antitumor effects without administration of adjuvants, thus reducing the safety concerns for vaccination.
In summary, we found that intratumoral therapeutic synthetic E7 long peptide vaccination resulted in both systemic and local increase of antigen-specific CD8+ T cells in mice bearing buccal tumors without the need to administer additional adjuvants to enhance the immunogenicity of the vaccine. This study suggests the possibility of clinical translation of administration of an adjuvant-free therapeutic HPV vaccine to generate potent cell-mediated immune responses and antitumor effects against HPV-associated lesions while preventing potential complications caused by adjuvants.
Six- to eight-week-old female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from the Charles Rivers Laboratories (Frederick, MD, USA). Female C57BL/10ScNJ mice carrying a spontaneous deletion of Tlr4 gene were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, Maine, USA). All animal procedures were performed according to approved protocols at the Johns Hopkins Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with recommendations for the proper use and care of laboratory animals.
Synthetic long peptide vaccine
The synthetic long-peptide vaccine used in this study, E7aa 43-62, consists of synthetic peptide resembling 43-62 amino acid peptide chain of HPV-16 E7 antigen. This synthetic peptide construct contains an H-2Db-restricted E7 epitope (aa 49-57), and its immunogenicity has been demonstrated in our previous study . The synthetic peptide was prepared at 95 % purity. No additional adjuvant was included in the vaccine.
For non-specific peptide vaccination experiment, CTL peptide OVA 241-270 (SMLVLLPDEVSGLEQLESIINFEKLTEWTS(OVA30)) were used. This peptide has been previously described .
In vivo tumor treatment experiments
For the establishment and treatment of orophoryngeal tumor, 3 × 104 TC-1-Luc cells were submucosally injected into the right buccal area of C57BL/6 or C57BL/10ScNJ mice. Tumor growth was confirmed by IVIS2000 bioluminescence imaging system. Three days after tumor injection, mice were vaccinated intratumorally with 50 μg of synthetic HPV-16 E7aa 43-62 peptide or 50 μg of CTL peptide OVA 241-270. Mice received same booster vaccination at 4-day intervals for a total of three boosters. The luminescence intensity of tumor was measured routinely with IVIS imaging machine.
For the establishment and treatment of abdominal tumor, 1 × 105 TC-1-Luc cells were subcutaneously injected into the abdomen of C57BL/6 mice. Mice then received intratumoral vaccination using the same treatment schedule as described for the orophoryngeal tumor model. Tumor growth was monitored routinely by palpation and inspection.
Hundred microgram of purified rat monoclonal antibody GK1.5 (anti-CD4) or mAB 2.43 (anti-CD8) were injected intraperitoneally 2 days before tumor injection. The injections were repeated once per day for 2 days until the day of tumor challenge. Mice were then inoculated with TC-1-Luc cells and vaccinated with synthetic HPV-16 E7aa 43-62 peptide following the same treatment schedule as described earlier for the oropharyngeal tumor model. Mice continued to receive anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 antibody injections once every week after tumor injection.
Peripheral blood cell, splenocyte, and tumor infiltrating lymphocyte preparation
Twenty-one days after tumor injection, peripheral blood was obtained from the mice treated with various treatment regimen and the spleen and TC-1 tumors of the mice were harvested. For the preparation of splenocytes, the spleen was meshed through a 70 μm nylon filter mesh. The splenocytes and peripheral blood cells were treated with ACK lysis buffer to lyse the red blood cells, the cells were then washed and viable cells were identified using trypan blue dye exclusion. TC-1 tumors were surgically excised using sterile technique, placed in RPMI-1640 medium containing 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and washed with PBS. The solid tumors were then minced into 1- to 2-mm pieces and immersed in serum-free RPMI-1640 medium containing 0.05 mg/ml collagenase I, 0.05 mg/ml collagenase IV, 0.025 mg/ml hyaluronidase IV, 0.25 mg/ml DNase I, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin and incubated at 37 °C with periodic agitation. The tumor digest was then filtered through a 70 μm nylon filter mesh to remove undigested tissue fragments. The resultant single tumor cell suspensions and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were washed twice in Hank’s buffered salt solution (HBSS) (400 g for 10 min), and viable cells were determined using trypan blue dye exclusion.
Tetramer analysis of E7-specific CD8+ T cells in tumor bearing mice
Cells harvested from the peripheral blood and TC-1 tumors were stained with phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated HPV16 H-2D-RAHYNIVTF tetramer combined with surface staining using APC-Alexa Fluor-conjugated anti-CD8 (BD Pharmingen). Cells were analyzed on a BD FACSCalibur collecting 500,000 events.
Intracellular cytokine staining and flow cytometry analysis
The cells harvested from the spleen of mice treated with various treatment regiments were incubated 0.1 μg/ml of HPV-16 E7 peptide containing an MHC class I epitope (aa49-57, RAHYNIVTF) in the presence of GolgiPlug (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, California, USA). The stimulated cells were then washed once with FACScan buffer and stained with phycoerythrin-conjugated monoclonal rat anti-mouse CD8a (clone 53.6.7). Cells were subjected to intracellular cytokine staining using the Cytofix/Cytoperm kit according to the manufacture’s instruction (BD Pharmingen). Intracellular IFN-γ was stained with FITC-conjugated rat anti-mouse IFN-γ. All antibodies were purchased from BD Pharmingen. Flow cytometry analysis was done using FACSCalibur with CellQuest software (BD Bioscience). FITC Rat IgG1, κ Isotype Control (Clone R3-34) was purchased from BD Pharmingen (Cat.# 554684).
All data presented in this study are expressed as mean ± SD. At least three samples per group were included in each of these experiments. Flow cytometry data and results of tumor treatment experiments were evaluated by analysis of variance (1-way ANOVA) and the Tukey–Kramer test. Individual data points were compared by student’s t-test. For all analysis, p values <0.05 were considered significant.
synthetic long peptides
antigen presenting cells
cytotoxic T lymphocyte
major histocompatibility complex
MCY, TCW, and CFH conceived and designed experiments and interpreted data. MCY, AY, JQ, BY, LH and YCT performed and experiments. MCY, AY, BY, JJ, TCW, and CFH wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported by the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH) Cervical Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) (P50 CA098252), R01 grant (CA114425-01), R21 grant (CA194896-01), and AI109259-01 grant.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
- Bosch FX, Lorincz A, Munoz N, Meijer CJ, Shah KV. The causal relation between human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. J Clin Pathol. 2002;55:244–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Mehanna H, Beech T, Nicholson T, El-Hariry I, McConkey C, Paleri V, Roberts S. Prevalence of human papillomavirus in oropharyngeal and nonoropharyngeal head and neck cancer–systematic review and meta-analysis of trends by time and region. Head Neck. 2013;35:747–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:518–27.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Garbuglia AR. Human papillomavirus in head and neck cancer. Cancers (Basel). 2014;6:1705–26.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Wheeler CM. Advances in primary and secondary interventions for cervical cancer: human papillomavirus prophylactic vaccines and testing. Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2007;4:224–35.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hildesheim A, Herrero R, Wacholder S, Rodriguez AC, Solomon D, Bratti MC, Schiller JT, Gonzalez P, Dubin G, Porras C, et al. Effect of human papillomavirus 16/18 L1 viruslike particle vaccine among young women with preexisting infection: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007;298:743–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tran NP, Hung CF, Roden R, Wu TC. Control of HPV infection and related cancer through vaccination. Recent Results Cancer Res. 2014;193:149–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ma B, Maraj B, Tran NP, Knoff J, Chen A, Alvarez RD, Hung CF, Wu TC. Emerging human papillomavirus vaccines. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs. 2012;17:469–92.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Liu TY, Hussein WM, Toth I, Skwarczynski M. Advances in peptide-based human papillomavirus therapeutic vaccines. Curr Top Med Chem. 2012;12:1581–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bolhassani A, Mohit E, Rafati S. Different spectra of therapeutic vaccine development against HPV infections. Hum Vaccin. 2009;5:671–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- van der Burg SH, Bijker MS, Welters MJ, Offringa R, Melief CJ. Improved peptide vaccine strategies, creating synthetic artificial infections to maximize immune efficacy. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2006;58:916–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bijker MS, Melief CJ, Offringa R, van der Burg SH. Design and development of synthetic peptide vaccines: past, present and future. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2007;6:591–603.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Toes RE, Offringa R, Blom RJ, Melief CJ, Kast WM. Peptide vaccination can lead to enhanced tumor growth through specific T-cell tolerance induction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:7855–60.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bijker MS, van den Eeden SJ, Franken KL, Melief CJ, Offringa R, van der Burg SH. CD8 + CTL priming by exact peptide epitopes in incomplete Freund’s adjuvant induces a vanishing CTL response, whereas long peptides induce sustained CTL reactivity. J Immunol. 2007;179:5033–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zwaveling S, Ferreira Mota SC, Nouta J, Johnson M, Lipford GB, Offringa R, van der Burg SH, Melief CJ. Established human papillomavirus type 16-expressing tumors are effectively eradicated following vaccination with long peptides. J Immunol. 2002;169:350–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bijker MS, van den Eeden SJ, Franken KL, Melief CJ, van der Burg SH, Offringa R. Superior induction of anti-tumor CTL immunity by extended peptide vaccines involves prolonged, DC-focused antigen presentation. Eur J Immunol. 2008;38:1033–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Melief CJ, van der Burg SH. Immunotherapy of established (pre)malignant disease by synthetic long peptide vaccines. Nat Rev Cancer. 2008;8:351–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gonda TA, Tu S, Wang TC. Chronic inflammation, the tumor microenvironment and carcinogenesis. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:2005–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Liu X, Ma X, Lei Z, Feng H, Wang S, Cen X, Gao S, Jiang Y, Jiang J, Chen Q, et al. Chronic inflammation-related HPV: a driving force speeds oropharyngeal carcinogenesis. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133681.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell. 2010;140:883–99.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Smyth MJ, Dunn GP, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting: the roles of immunity in suppressing tumor development and shaping tumor immunogenicity. Adv Immunol. 2006;90:1–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang YQ, Tsai YC, Monie A, Hung CF, Wu TC. Carrageenan as an adjuvant to enhance peptide-based vaccine potency. Vaccine. 2010;28:5212–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kang TH, Mao CP, Lee SY, Chen A, Lee JH, Kim TW, Alvarez RD, Roden RB, Pardoll D, Hung CF, Wu TC. Chemotherapy acts as an adjuvant to convert the tumor microenvironment into a highly permissive state for vaccination-induced antitumor immunity. Cancer Res. 2013;73:2493–504.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Etchart N, Desmoulins PO, Chemin K, Maliszewski C, Dubois B, Wild F, Kaiserlian D. Dendritic cells recruitment and in vivo priming of CD8+ CTL induced by a single topical or transepithelial immunization via the buccal mucosa with measles virus nucleoprotein. J Immunol. 2001;167:384–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hakerud M, Selbo PK, Waeckerle-Men Y, Contassot E, Dziunycz P, Kundig TM, Hogset A, Johansen P. Photosensitisation facilitates cross-priming of adjuvant-free protein vaccines and stimulation of tumour-suppressing CD8 T cells. J Control Release. 2015;198:10–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chesson CB, Huelsmann EJ, Lacek AT, Kohlhapp FJ, Webb MF, Nabatiyan A, Zloza A, Rudra JS. Antigenic peptide nanofibers elicit adjuvant-free CD8(+) T cell responses. Vaccine. 2014;32:1174–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pepponi I, Stylianou E, van Dolleweerd C, Diogo GR, Paul MJ, Drake PM, Ma JK, Reljic R. Immune-complex mimics as a molecular platform for adjuvant-free vaccine delivery. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60855.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Faries MB, Hsueh EC, Ye X, Hoban M, Morton DL. Effect of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor on vaccination with an allogeneic whole-cell melanoma vaccine. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7029–35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Slingluff CL Jr, Petroni GR, Olson WC, Smolkin ME, Ross MI, Haas NB, Grosh WW, Boisvert ME, Kirkwood JM, Chianese-Bullock KA. Effect of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor on circulating CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses to a multipeptide melanoma vaccine: outcome of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7036–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Salerno EP, Shea SM, Olson WC, Petroni GR, Smolkin ME, McSkimming C, Chianese-Bullock KA, Slingluff CL Jr. Activation, dysfunction and retention of T cells in vaccine sites after injection of incomplete Freund’s adjuvant, with or without peptide. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2013;62:1149–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hailemichael Y, Dai Z, Jaffarzad N, Ye Y, Medina MA, Huang XF, Dorta-Estremera SM, Greeley NR, Nitti G, Peng W, et al. Persistent antigen at vaccination sites induces tumor-specific CD8(+) T cell sequestration, dysfunction and deletion. Nat Med. 2013;19:465–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Shaw CA, Petrik MS. Aluminum hydroxide injections lead to motor deficits and motor neuron degeneration. J Inorg Biochem. 2009;103:1555–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Perricone C, Colafrancesco S, Mazor RD, Soriano A, Agmon-Levin N, Shoenfeld Y. Autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA) 2013: unveiling the pathogenic, clinical and diagnostic aspects. J Autoimmun. 2013;47:1–16.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Peng S, Song L, Knoff J, Wang JW, Chang YN, Hannaman D, Wu TC, Alvarez RD, Roden RB, Hung CF. Control of HPV-associated tumors by innovative therapeutic HPV DNA vaccine in the absence of CD4+ T cells. Cell Biosci. 2014;4:11.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lin KY, Guarnieri FG, Staveley-O’Carroll KF, Levitsky HI, August JT, Pardoll DM, Wu TC. Treatment of established tumors with a novel vaccine that enhances major histocompatibility class II presentation of tumor antigen. Cancer Res. 1996;56:21–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wu CY, Yang LH, Yang HY, Knoff J, Peng S, Lin YH, Wang C, Alvarez RD, Pai SI, Roden RB, et al. Enhanced cancer radiotherapy through immunosuppressive stromal cell destruction in tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:644–57.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar